kgatchel's Recent Comments
Too Cool to be Forgotten #1 - Apr 16, 2008 - 10:58am
My avatar is an angry, zombie-looking, fat kid? Ok.
My avatar is an angry, zombie-looking, fat kid? Ok.
Too Cool to be Forgotten #1 - Apr 16, 2008 - 10:57am
Damn it. He stole my idea, and made it better than I would have. Time to either get up and put some effort into my goals or kill Alex Robinson. I'm going to kill Alex Robinson!
Damn it. He stole my idea, and made it better than I would have. Time to either get up and put some effort into my goals or kill Alex Robinson. I'm going to kill Alex Robinson!
SCUD Exclusive at NY Comic Con - Mar 28, 2008 - 01:47pm
You just have to read the comic to understand. Well, you just have to read it in general. I can't explain Scud in a message board comment. The inner 12 year old that's never left my body is ecstatically jumping up and down right now. My childhood is now complete.
You just have to read the comic to understand. Well, you just have to read it in general. I can't explain Scud in a message board comment. The inner 12 year old that's never left my body is ecstatically jumping up and down right now. My childhood is now complete.
Ian McKellen Responds to HOBBIT Prequels - Mar 26, 2008 - 10:51am
Who the hell asked these questions? I'm not a reporter, but if his question were any longer, that would have to get broken up into it's own trilogy. zing?
Who the hell asked these questions? I'm not a reporter, but if his question were any longer, that would have to get broken up into it's own trilogy. zing?
High Scale Theaters Coming Soon - Mar 26, 2008 - 10:31am
For $20 or $35 bucks you could go see actual theatre.
For $20 or $35 bucks you could go see actual theatre.
TOOTH & NAIL - Mar 20, 2008 - 10:10am
Whenever I'd see the credits "written and directed by..." that always seemed like a bad sign. I'd think, "Gee, this guy didn't have a script good enough to find a director" or "Gee, this director is such an arrogant jerk that he thinks he can write a script around several images in his head." Then I started making my own stuff, and I ended up being the "writer/director". Also, I'd have to act. So, my opinion still stands, but now I give people a little more leeway.
Whenever I'd see the credits "written and directed by..." that always seemed like a bad sign. I'd think, "Gee, this guy didn't have a script good enough to find a director" or "Gee, this director is such an arrogant jerk that he thinks he can write a script around several images in his head." Then I started making my own stuff, and I ended up being the "writer/director". Also, I'd have to act. So, my opinion still stands, but now I give people a little more leeway.
Berg Confirmed for DUNE - Mar 18, 2008 - 10:10am
I never thought I'd say this, but I think I'd rather see Dune made into a really good video game than a movie. The big appeal, to me, of the books was learning more about the world and all the little nuances (the Fremen don't have a word for "drowned", the Atriedes have their own body language to communicate when bugged). You really can't fit the world of Dune into a movie, sorry to say. And the more anyone tries, the more it tends to damage the books reputation. They should just throw how
I never thought I'd say this, but I think I'd rather see Dune made into a really good video game than a movie. The big appeal, to me, of the books was learning more about the world and all the little nuances (the Fremen don't have a word for "drowned", the Atriedes have their own body language to communicate when bugged). You really can't fit the world of Dune into a movie, sorry to say. And the more anyone tries, the more it tends to damage the books reputation. They should just throw how
Watching the Watchmen - Mar 12, 2008 - 10:40am
Does anyone else have to scroll from side to side to read articles on this website? It seems this website never wants to fit my screen
Does anyone else have to scroll from side to side to read articles on this website? It seems this website never wants to fit my screen
NECA's Stuntman Mike - Mar 06, 2008 - 07:48am
I disagree. True, it was full of alot of talk (a lot), but it's nice to watch a movie take it's time and mess with what we expect the story to be. Plus, it's supposed to be a bad movie. Not that that's a huge excuse, but it just throws all critical thinking out the window. I described "Death Proof" to my friends in that it's like how every band has that one album that you have to be fan of the band to like. "Death Proof" is Quentin Tarentino's album. Meanwhile, "Planet Terror" was Robert Rodriguez's version of Garth Brooks assuming the character of Chris Gaines, as if the movie had been directed by some guy who thought the cheesy dialogue and plot were really good. That's what made it so much fun. And, yeah, "Planet Terror" was better than "Death Proof" for those reasons. But both were great.
I disagree. True, it was full of alot of talk (a lot), but it's nice to watch a movie take it's time and mess with what we expect the story to be. Plus, it's supposed to be a bad movie. Not that that's a huge excuse, but it just throws all critical thinking out the window. I described "Death Proof" to my friends in that it's like how every band has that one album that you have to be fan of the band to like. "Death Proof" is Quentin Tarentino's album. Meanwhile, "Planet Terror" was Robert Rodriguez's version of Garth Brooks assuming the character of Chris Gaines, as if the movie had been directed by some guy who thought the cheesy dialogue and plot were really good. That's what made it so much fun. And, yeah, "Planet Terror" was better than "Death Proof" for those reasons. But both were great.
BLADE: The Series - Mar 04, 2008 - 10:34am
"These episodes are extended and unrated so even if you saw them during their initial TV run, there will be new stuff to see. More gore, profanity, as well as a bit of nudity." I always love when DVDs say they're "extended and unrated", as if there's these epic scenes of sex and gore that the censors made the creators cut out under penalty of torture. These guys knew they were making a TV, and certainly not one for HBO. Let's not pretend that just because it's "extended and unrated" that it's worth buying if you weren't going to already.
"These episodes are extended and unrated so even if you saw them during their initial TV run, there will be new stuff to see. More gore, profanity, as well as a bit of nudity." I always love when DVDs say they're "extended and unrated", as if there's these epic scenes of sex and gore that the censors made the creators cut out under penalty of torture. These guys knew they were making a TV, and certainly not one for HBO. Let's not pretend that just because it's "extended and unrated" that it's worth buying if you weren't going to already.
KICK ASS #1 - Feb 26, 2008 - 02:03pm
After reading what you put, I did go check out some of his stuff on Google with what you guys said in mind, and I see more of where you're coming from. But I don't exactly see him doing anything amazing, outside of what's pretty much par for the course. Again, it's like all his characters were traced from a picture someone else drew. And, again, artists should look for their own style. But Romita's just distracting. Although, I think he would be great teaching comic book drawing. Maybe the Kubert school has an opening.
After reading what you put, I did go check out some of his stuff on Google with what you guys said in mind, and I see more of where you're coming from. But I don't exactly see him doing anything amazing, outside of what's pretty much par for the course. Again, it's like all his characters were traced from a picture someone else drew. And, again, artists should look for their own style. But Romita's just distracting. Although, I think he would be great teaching comic book drawing. Maybe the Kubert school has an opening.
KICK ASS #1 - Feb 26, 2008 - 10:21am
What exactly is the appeal of John Romita Jr's artwork? Everything he draws just looks like a bunch of incomplete sketches drawn with a boxing glove. Ok, he does buildings well, and giant posters because those don't usually need a lot of detail. But, otherwise, his art just looks bad. Personally, I think a good comic book artist makes the pages read naturally. You should look at the characters and think, "Yes, that is how they're supposed to look." Jim Lee, Mark Bagely, and John Cassidy are masters at that, as are others. But you can tell it's a John Romita Jr. book looking at it from space. Again, a distinctive style is great for any artist, just don't let it get in the way.
What exactly is the appeal of John Romita Jr's artwork? Everything he draws just looks like a bunch of incomplete sketches drawn with a boxing glove. Ok, he does buildings well, and giant posters because those don't usually need a lot of detail. But, otherwise, his art just looks bad. Personally, I think a good comic book artist makes the pages read naturally. You should look at the characters and think, "Yes, that is how they're supposed to look." Jim Lee, Mark Bagely, and John Cassidy are masters at that, as are others. But you can tell it's a John Romita Jr. book looking at it from space. Again, a distinctive style is great for any artist, just don't let it get in the way.
SAW IV - Feb 18, 2008 - 12:15pm
"But I have to wonder if they are just hastily building a story around the traps instead of the other way around." Well, pushing aside any sarcassm, yes, I think it's safe to say they are.
"But I have to wonder if they are just hastily building a story around the traps instead of the other way around." Well, pushing aside any sarcassm, yes, I think it's safe to say they are.
SCUD THE DISPOSABLE ASSASSIN #21 - Feb 15, 2008 - 12:57pm
Let me be the first to say that I did wait ten years for this issue to come out, and I wasn't disappointed. I remember being introduced to Scud at GenCon back in 1994 when I was almost 12 years old, and I haven't been the same since. Pick up a copy for your kids.
Let me be the first to say that I did wait ten years for this issue to come out, and I wasn't disappointed. I remember being introduced to Scud at GenCon back in 1994 when I was almost 12 years old, and I haven't been the same since. Pick up a copy for your kids.
BSG Returns to Sci-Fi April 4 - Feb 13, 2008 - 01:54pm
Oh, I was planning on watching something else. But there's really no point in putting it on in the first place. And, as great as it is that Battlestar Galactica is coming back, it's not like it's a miracle from Heaven. No one was worried it was gone. I'll save my "superdelegates" comments for the more political websites. This is one is about pop culture and I would hate to get things off topic. But you put whatever you want.
Oh, I was planning on watching something else. But there's really no point in putting it on in the first place. And, as great as it is that Battlestar Galactica is coming back, it's not like it's a miracle from Heaven. No one was worried it was gone. I'll save my "superdelegates" comments for the more political websites. This is one is about pop culture and I would hate to get things off topic. But you put whatever you want.
BSG Returns to Sci-Fi April 4 - Feb 13, 2008 - 10:25am
So, a week before they premiere Battlestar Galactica, Sci-Fi Channel is going to air a special with a bunch of people telling us how great Battlestar Galactica is? Won't all the people watching it already know how great it is? Couldn't they just, I don't know, air the actual premiere then. They could even start it off with that half-hour recap. Hell, throw in the last two episodes so we can get into the groove before the first new episode in what feels like forever. They could make a night of it. Give Flash Gordon a break. Battlestar Galactica: The Phenomenon is just going to be an informercial, an informercial with commercials. Or, they could save it for the DVD, where it belongs.
So, a week before they premiere Battlestar Galactica, Sci-Fi Channel is going to air a special with a bunch of people telling us how great Battlestar Galactica is? Won't all the people watching it already know how great it is? Couldn't they just, I don't know, air the actual premiere then. They could even start it off with that half-hour recap. Hell, throw in the last two episodes so we can get into the groove before the first new episode in what feels like forever. They could make a night of it. Give Flash Gordon a break. Battlestar Galactica: The Phenomenon is just going to be an informercial, an informercial with commercials. Or, they could save it for the DVD, where it belongs.
Englund Not Returning for NIGHTMARE Restart - Feb 04, 2008 - 05:14pm
Is this going to end up being PG-13, so they can get the teenagers in? Then they can release it on DVD with an "unrated director's cut", which really doesn't add anything new because it was going to be PG-13 anyway. I'm all for the "picture in your mind" horror, but these guys aren't going to do that. So, let's not water down Freddy.
Is this going to end up being PG-13, so they can get the teenagers in? Then they can release it on DVD with an "unrated director's cut", which really doesn't add anything new because it was going to be PG-13 anyway. I'm all for the "picture in your mind" horror, but these guys aren't going to do that. So, let's not water down Freddy.
Quadrilogy - Jan 29, 2008 - 10:04am
I blame every "completist" out there for feeling that they "have to" see every "installment" of a movie, despite smelling the stink of the turd from the first trailer you saw. I don't care how much your drag your feet going into the theater, or bitch about it when you come out. You gave the studios your money, and that's all they want. They made their money back on the opening weekend, and they'll make their profit releasing it on DVD, then the special edition, then the "quadrology." Congradulations, they got you pegged. Oh, and now they're remaking it.
I blame every "completist" out there for feeling that they "have to" see every "installment" of a movie, despite smelling the stink of the turd from the first trailer you saw. I don't care how much your drag your feet going into the theater, or bitch about it when you come out. You gave the studios your money, and that's all they want. They made their money back on the opening weekend, and they'll make their profit releasing it on DVD, then the special edition, then the "quadrology." Congradulations, they got you pegged. Oh, and now they're remaking it.
RANT: Have You Ever Had a Friend... - Jan 21, 2008 - 10:15am
Flash Gordon travels to an ice planet called "Frigia"? I think it would take an overzealous fan to explain to me why that show is still on.
Flash Gordon travels to an ice planet called "Frigia"? I think it would take an overzealous fan to explain to me why that show is still on.
TORN - Jan 15, 2008 - 11:04am
I'm going to sound like a snob for it, but every one of those reasons to see a movie in the cinema is the exact same reason to go see live theatre. In fact, even moreso. True, you still get the pricks who can't shut up. But, believe me, when people know that who they're yelling at can hear them, they stay a lot quieter. This is one of the reasons I don't go see movies on the big screen as much as I used to. Most movies that I want to see I can watch fine at home or with friends (that's the best way). If it's a movie that has to be see on a giant screen, be it because of the action scenes (or some nearly unidetifiable robots that transform into disappointment) then I'm probably not interested (outside of the usual geek-induced trips). Again, I'm not trying to be a theatre snob, because there's plenty of bad stuff in theatre too. But if I'm going out to see something, I don't want it to be something I can just see at home.
I'm going to sound like a snob for it, but every one of those reasons to see a movie in the cinema is the exact same reason to go see live theatre. In fact, even moreso. True, you still get the pricks who can't shut up. But, believe me, when people know that who they're yelling at can hear them, they stay a lot quieter. This is one of the reasons I don't go see movies on the big screen as much as I used to. Most movies that I want to see I can watch fine at home or with friends (that's the best way). If it's a movie that has to be see on a giant screen, be it because of the action scenes (or some nearly unidetifiable robots that transform into disappointment) then I'm probably not interested (outside of the usual geek-induced trips). Again, I'm not trying to be a theatre snob, because there's plenty of bad stuff in theatre too. But if I'm going out to see something, I don't want it to be something I can just see at home.
There are a Few Things to Watch - Jan 07, 2008 - 10:28am
I didn't know Flash Gordon had writers. I just figured it was bunch of actors with a truckload of stories rejected from Heavy Metal magazine who then translate them from English to Japanese and then back to English again. At least, that's what it sounds like when I flip to Sci-Fi Channel, see that Flash Gordon is on, and then flip to another channel. So, maybe I'm just illinformed. Is Fox playing "The Sarah Conner Chronicles" in full on it's website after it premieres. I got rid of my TV channels in part to save money and in solidarity to the writer's strike (plus, I'd been thinking about doing it anyway, so there's no better time). But, are they showing it via the internet. Get rid of your channels. Take this strike as a chance to cut down on TV.
I didn't know Flash Gordon had writers. I just figured it was bunch of actors with a truckload of stories rejected from Heavy Metal magazine who then translate them from English to Japanese and then back to English again. At least, that's what it sounds like when I flip to Sci-Fi Channel, see that Flash Gordon is on, and then flip to another channel. So, maybe I'm just illinformed. Is Fox playing "The Sarah Conner Chronicles" in full on it's website after it premieres. I got rid of my TV channels in part to save money and in solidarity to the writer's strike (plus, I'd been thinking about doing it anyway, so there's no better time). But, are they showing it via the internet. Get rid of your channels. Take this strike as a chance to cut down on TV.
Look of the New INCREDIBLE HULK - Dec 26, 2007 - 04:19pm
"And on June 13, 2008, one scientist must make an agonizing final choice..." Are we cut and pasting right out of the press release now? It's not like you have to sell us on it, for the most part. As one comic book fan said to me after he saw the Ang Lee version: "I hated it. It sucks that I have to buy it when it comes out on DVD."
"And on June 13, 2008, one scientist must make an agonizing final choice..." Are we cut and pasting right out of the press release now? It's not like you have to sell us on it, for the most part. As one comic book fan said to me after he saw the Ang Lee version: "I hated it. It sucks that I have to buy it when it comes out on DVD."
Plot Details Emerge for TERMINATOR SALVATION Trilogy - Dec 20, 2007 - 10:31am
Wasn't such a great part of the first three movies (yes, even the third one) about how there was this war that was coming, but we never really saw it (strictly speaking)? I've always liked the fact that the first three were the result of this war in the background (or the cause of it in the future, again, so to speak). The whole "robot war" thing's been done to death, and that's basically because of the first three movies. It seems to me that everyone hated "Matrix: Revolution" (except me) because it was too much like them in the first place. And can we not have every movie in the world be a trilogy? If I'm going to pay $8 bucks for a movie, I don't want to just watch you set up for some other one 6 years away. And if it bombs, you're screwed, because nothing kills a story like having to explain it. Even "The Matrix" and "Star Wars", be they intended trilogies or not, at least did everything they could to make their first movies solid works that stood on their own, as opposed to this "foreshadowing for the next movie" bullshit.
Wasn't such a great part of the first three movies (yes, even the third one) about how there was this war that was coming, but we never really saw it (strictly speaking)? I've always liked the fact that the first three were the result of this war in the background (or the cause of it in the future, again, so to speak). The whole "robot war" thing's been done to death, and that's basically because of the first three movies. It seems to me that everyone hated "Matrix: Revolution" (except me) because it was too much like them in the first place. And can we not have every movie in the world be a trilogy? If I'm going to pay $8 bucks for a movie, I don't want to just watch you set up for some other one 6 years away. And if it bombs, you're screwed, because nothing kills a story like having to explain it. Even "The Matrix" and "Star Wars", be they intended trilogies or not, at least did everything they could to make their first movies solid works that stood on their own, as opposed to this "foreshadowing for the next movie" bullshit.
SANTA CLAUSE 3: THE ESCAPE CLAUSE - Dec 17, 2007 - 12:41pm
I'd been waiting for a review on this website to see if I should get this. It's been a long, tense, refresh-button clicking kind of year. Isn't Tim Allen just fufilling one long contractual obligation? I can't imagine that anyone in this movie's target demographic remember the hey-days of Home Improvement, and those of us that watched pretty much every episode aren't exactly clamouring to see what he does next. Does Tim Allen have some rabid, loyal, fanbase out there? Couldn't this have been done with any other actor and it wouldn't have mattered? Well, at least they got to complete the epic trilogy they'd originally intended. Now maybe when they make a forth one, you can finally treat that like the lazy, pandering product the studio knows will break even. I mean, really, "love him or hate him"? I can't sum up enough of either to register.
I'd been waiting for a review on this website to see if I should get this. It's been a long, tense, refresh-button clicking kind of year. Isn't Tim Allen just fufilling one long contractual obligation? I can't imagine that anyone in this movie's target demographic remember the hey-days of Home Improvement, and those of us that watched pretty much every episode aren't exactly clamouring to see what he does next. Does Tim Allen have some rabid, loyal, fanbase out there? Couldn't this have been done with any other actor and it wouldn't have mattered? Well, at least they got to complete the epic trilogy they'd originally intended. Now maybe when they make a forth one, you can finally treat that like the lazy, pandering product the studio knows will break even. I mean, really, "love him or hate him"? I can't sum up enough of either to register.
PARANORMAL STATE: Premiere - Dec 12, 2007 - 03:17pm
It wasn't that bad. Actually, I never saw it. I just want the attention. But now I feel like watching it out of morbid curiousity, and I usually make it a point not to watch shows that are "so bad they're good." (it encourages them) So, I'll probably just watch it until I don't want to watch it anymore. Or maybe I'll love it. The future is full of possibilities.
It wasn't that bad. Actually, I never saw it. I just want the attention. But now I feel like watching it out of morbid curiousity, and I usually make it a point not to watch shows that are "so bad they're good." (it encourages them) So, I'll probably just watch it until I don't want to watch it anymore. Or maybe I'll love it. The future is full of possibilities.
Horror Writers Get Creative for WGA STRIKE - Nov 28, 2007 - 12:22pm
To Dazzler and Wiseguy (if those are your real names), if someone took the writers off your favorite show you'd pitch a fit. I can't imagine anyone visiting (and commenting) on this site without a favorite genre show of some kind. And I don't think the horror strikers were using fear to get fan support (that sounds ironic). They were stating a fact. And the studios aren't asking for help from the fans because they look at us like we're money. I don't think the studios can make a good case against the writers when their arguement is, "I want another Porsch."
To Dazzler and Wiseguy (if those are your real names), if someone took the writers off your favorite show you'd pitch a fit. I can't imagine anyone visiting (and commenting) on this site without a favorite genre show of some kind. And I don't think the horror strikers were using fear to get fan support (that sounds ironic). They were stating a fact. And the studios aren't asking for help from the fans because they look at us like we're money. I don't think the studios can make a good case against the writers when their arguement is, "I want another Porsch."
Cyber Monday and the New Amazon Kindle - Nov 26, 2007 - 12:16pm
I take it this means that in the near future we're going to hear the phrase, "You haven't read Philip K. Dick until you've read it on paper." It's going to be CD vs. vinyl all over again. You know how, when you write a research paper, you can proofread it all you want, but, the minute it gets printed out you see those typos that your eyes just didn't catch on the screen? That's how I feel about e-books. I look at a screen enough as it is. But, then, I have skepticism toward anything that needs batteries. And, plus, what will people do when they lose all their books in their one..."kindle"? People already freak out enough when they lose their Ipod (yes, that's how I'm going to spell it).
I take it this means that in the near future we're going to hear the phrase, "You haven't read Philip K. Dick until you've read it on paper." It's going to be CD vs. vinyl all over again. You know how, when you write a research paper, you can proofread it all you want, but, the minute it gets printed out you see those typos that your eyes just didn't catch on the screen? That's how I feel about e-books. I look at a screen enough as it is. But, then, I have skepticism toward anything that needs batteries. And, plus, what will people do when they lose all their books in their one..."kindle"? People already freak out enough when they lose their Ipod (yes, that's how I'm going to spell it).
Completist? - Nov 20, 2007 - 12:38pm
I don't think "Live Free or Die Hard" was meant to complete the epic tale of John McClane that the creators intended to tell all along. I doubt any of them paced around their Santa Monica houses, just burning to realize their vision on the big screen and show the world what they have to say about what happens when a guy with guns shoots at a bunch of other guys with guns. And I'll call all you completests suckers, because that's what the movie studios think of you. And how much money do you people have that you can just buy things you don't like?
I don't think "Live Free or Die Hard" was meant to complete the epic tale of John McClane that the creators intended to tell all along. I doubt any of them paced around their Santa Monica houses, just burning to realize their vision on the big screen and show the world what they have to say about what happens when a guy with guns shoots at a bunch of other guys with guns. And I'll call all you completests suckers, because that's what the movie studios think of you. And how much money do you people have that you can just buy things you don't like?
Scott Bros. Handle Poe's TELL-TALE - Oct 31, 2007 - 11:53am
I hope they pad the short-story in 90 minutes by making Poe shoot off two guns while riding his motorcycle over a car and making it explode in the background. When he lands, it needs to be in bullet time.
I hope they pad the short-story in 90 minutes by making Poe shoot off two guns while riding his motorcycle over a car and making it explode in the background. When he lands, it needs to be in bullet time.
STAR WARS: DEATH STAR - Oct 22, 2007 - 03:46pm
Sounds good, but a prison planet called "Despayre"? (*despair*) Really? Isn't that a little on-the-nose, like a high schooler named it or something? Couldn't they just call it "Suxtubeeyu"?
Sounds good, but a prison planet called "Despayre"? (*despair*) Really? Isn't that a little on-the-nose, like a high schooler named it or something? Couldn't they just call it "Suxtubeeyu"?
FLIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD - Oct 16, 2007 - 12:30pm
As clever as "Shaun of The Dead"? Ok...but now you've raised my expectations. And, yeah, the infected people in "28 Days Later" are zombies. Let's not hurt ourselves with the distinction, especially when it's more work to correct people. It's not like saying 2000 was the start of the new millenium. In this case, we have some wiggle room. Plus, you can also make the case of "How dead do you have to be to be a zombie?" There's a "Terry Schivo" arguement in there if you think about it. And to any "zombie purists" out there (should there be any...I mean, really, should there?) I say bring on the running zombies, even in a plane. Even when I was a kid, I didn't think zombies were that scary because you can just run faster than them and catch your breath. Frankly, even though "28 Days Later" is a better movie, the "Dawn of The Dead" remake has a good compromise: let them lurch around, like they do traditionally, untill they find someone to eat. Now I want to watch one of those films. I wonder if my boss will let me while I sit at my desk. Fortunatley, "Planet Terror" should be waiting in my mailbox when I get home.
As clever as "Shaun of The Dead"? Ok...but now you've raised my expectations. And, yeah, the infected people in "28 Days Later" are zombies. Let's not hurt ourselves with the distinction, especially when it's more work to correct people. It's not like saying 2000 was the start of the new millenium. In this case, we have some wiggle room. Plus, you can also make the case of "How dead do you have to be to be a zombie?" There's a "Terry Schivo" arguement in there if you think about it. And to any "zombie purists" out there (should there be any...I mean, really, should there?) I say bring on the running zombies, even in a plane. Even when I was a kid, I didn't think zombies were that scary because you can just run faster than them and catch your breath. Frankly, even though "28 Days Later" is a better movie, the "Dawn of The Dead" remake has a good compromise: let them lurch around, like they do traditionally, untill they find someone to eat. Now I want to watch one of those films. I wonder if my boss will let me while I sit at my desk. Fortunatley, "Planet Terror" should be waiting in my mailbox when I get home.
MAD About Star Wars: Thirty Years of Classic Parodies - Oct 08, 2007 - 12:09pm
I once said I'd stop buying MAD once they started showing actual advertisements. It was a joke I never thought would come true. Such is the decline of the print media. But it's good to see even parodies of Star Wars getting in on the anniversary. I'll have to read this at the store and then put it back.
I once said I'd stop buying MAD once they started showing actual advertisements. It was a joke I never thought would come true. Such is the decline of the print media. But it's good to see even parodies of Star Wars getting in on the anniversary. I'll have to read this at the store and then put it back.
Forest Whitaker Dealing 'Arms' with FX Network - Oct 08, 2007 - 12:01pm
FX has such a solid formula of taking an established actor (who probably just wants to do a TV series for the stability), putting them in a profession, giving them a major character flaw, and surrounding them with some screwed up characters. Next, we're going to see Rob Lowe as a race car drive with a cocaine addiction. We're going to call it "Speed".
FX has such a solid formula of taking an established actor (who probably just wants to do a TV series for the stability), putting them in a profession, giving them a major character flaw, and surrounding them with some screwed up characters. Next, we're going to see Rob Lowe as a race car drive with a cocaine addiction. We're going to call it "Speed".
Blustering Over Barcodes - Oct 03, 2007 - 01:39pm
There's no excuse for "it's just business" when it hampers, weakens, and destroys smaller businesses in its wake. These companies are too large, yet we have this idea that if small businesses "just try" they're going to compete with the large chains that flatten any competition. Just the idea of only using bar codes because larger chains require them (Borders, Amazon, Barnes and Noble, etc.) purposefully placates to them. It's all the rich white men talking to each other and making deals to consolidate power. When will people realize that businesses aren't here to help people. They're made to send money and power up to one person, first and foremost. It's not like these large chains got to where they are just because they happened to smile at the customers a lot more and keep their floors extra clean. They did it by screwing over a little guy somewhere, usually through recent deregulation practices that get passed under the radar. Soon enough, even the employees will need bar codes, and by then, there won't be other competition to go to.
There's no excuse for "it's just business" when it hampers, weakens, and destroys smaller businesses in its wake. These companies are too large, yet we have this idea that if small businesses "just try" they're going to compete with the large chains that flatten any competition. Just the idea of only using bar codes because larger chains require them (Borders, Amazon, Barnes and Noble, etc.) purposefully placates to them. It's all the rich white men talking to each other and making deals to consolidate power. When will people realize that businesses aren't here to help people. They're made to send money and power up to one person, first and foremost. It's not like these large chains got to where they are just because they happened to smile at the customers a lot more and keep their floors extra clean. They did it by screwing over a little guy somewhere, usually through recent deregulation practices that get passed under the radar. Soon enough, even the employees will need bar codes, and by then, there won't be other competition to go to.
What Will You Watch? - Oct 01, 2007 - 12:31pm
For those of you who think that "Dark Ride" is better because it was part of the "8 Films To Die For", I can assure you that even watching it for free doesn't make it any good. I can't imagine that watching it under any kind of influence would make it good. Skip it. Skip it with everything you've got.
For those of you who think that "Dark Ride" is better because it was part of the "8 Films To Die For", I can assure you that even watching it for free doesn't make it any good. I can't imagine that watching it under any kind of influence would make it good. Skip it. Skip it with everything you've got.
STAR TREK TNG: Resistance - Sep 13, 2007 - 12:18pm
Only because Nemesis is mentioned do I feel the need to defend it as one of the best Star Trek movies. I've had this discussion on message boards before, but yes, it is better than "Wrath of Kahn". The New Frontier books would be good if they were adapted for movies or television. I think I stopped at Book 4 or 5, but I loved them.
Only because Nemesis is mentioned do I feel the need to defend it as one of the best Star Trek movies. I've had this discussion on message boards before, but yes, it is better than "Wrath of Kahn". The New Frontier books would be good if they were adapted for movies or television. I think I stopped at Book 4 or 5, but I loved them.
TALES FROM THE CRYPT Vol. 2 - Sep 11, 2007 - 12:15pm
Just to make it clear, Max Gaines wasn't just killed in a boating accident. He was decapitated while saving a boy's life from the boat that killed him.
Just to make it clear, Max Gaines wasn't just killed in a boating accident. He was decapitated while saving a boy's life from the boat that killed him.
TV on DVD - Sep 10, 2007 - 12:47pm
"I couldn’t ever get into Doctor Who because I’m kind of over the whole time travel thing, plus when I’m watching sci-fi, I tend to prefer to see it in the future and the good Doctor made way too many trips into the past for me." So...he goes to too many places for you? Would you rather he pick a small town full of geniuses and just stay there? If you've seen a few episodes and don't really dig the themes or the characters, then ok. But if it's that there's just not enough lasers for you, then too bad. You're missing the strongest show Sci-Fi Channel doesn't publicize enough. Maybe you should review an episode or two.
"I couldn’t ever get into Doctor Who because I’m kind of over the whole time travel thing, plus when I’m watching sci-fi, I tend to prefer to see it in the future and the good Doctor made way too many trips into the past for me." So...he goes to too many places for you? Would you rather he pick a small town full of geniuses and just stay there? If you've seen a few episodes and don't really dig the themes or the characters, then ok. But if it's that there's just not enough lasers for you, then too bad. You're missing the strongest show Sci-Fi Channel doesn't publicize enough. Maybe you should review an episode or two.
EUREKA: Family Reunion - Aug 30, 2007 - 11:52am
As I understand it, BBC America is it's own network, and not an off-shoot of the BBC, meaning it has to bin on TV shows just like everyone else, with no special treatment. Plus, I haven't heard the world's greatest things about Torchwood (some good things), and so they probably passed on it to keep things diversified. Is anyone reading this a week later? *ECHOOO*. *ECHOOO*
As I understand it, BBC America is it's own network, and not an off-shoot of the BBC, meaning it has to bin on TV shows just like everyone else, with no special treatment. Plus, I haven't heard the world's greatest things about Torchwood (some good things), and so they probably passed on it to keep things diversified. Is anyone reading this a week later? *ECHOOO*. *ECHOOO*
A Critic’s Eye for the Comic Guy - Aug 29, 2007 - 11:49am
Time makes everything better. Frankly, it's the preparation they put in before they start a new series, or jump onto an established one, that makes or breaks them. Jeph Loeb and Jim Lee made their run on Batman brilliant because they knew the end before the beginning. The same goes for Kevin Smith on Green Arrow. Otherwise, they're basically turning in their first drafts, and it's a pretty ignorant writer who thinks their first drafts are always the best.
Time makes everything better. Frankly, it's the preparation they put in before they start a new series, or jump onto an established one, that makes or breaks them. Jeph Loeb and Jim Lee made their run on Batman brilliant because they knew the end before the beginning. The same goes for Kevin Smith on Green Arrow. Otherwise, they're basically turning in their first drafts, and it's a pretty ignorant writer who thinks their first drafts are always the best.
EUREKA: Family Reunion - Aug 23, 2007 - 12:15pm
I'm going to do my impression of every commercial Sci-Fi Channel airs for any episode of this show: some Genius: "It's a chonological reversifizing displacement manipulation-a-tron." Carter: "Couldn't you just say time machine?" some Genius: "He's the dumb one." ....aaaaand scene. I'll admit, I've only seen a few episodes. But it really doesn't make me want to watch more. And Sci-Fi Channel needs to up the awareness of Doctor Who. I never see that show's title in faint graphics on the bottom right of the screen.
I'm going to do my impression of every commercial Sci-Fi Channel airs for any episode of this show: some Genius: "It's a chonological reversifizing displacement manipulation-a-tron." Carter: "Couldn't you just say time machine?" some Genius: "He's the dumb one." ....aaaaand scene. I'll admit, I've only seen a few episodes. But it really doesn't make me want to watch more. And Sci-Fi Channel needs to up the awareness of Doctor Who. I never see that show's title in faint graphics on the bottom right of the screen.
EUREKA: Duck, Duck, Goose - Aug 09, 2007 - 01:18pm
Does everyone else have to scroll back and forth to read the ends of the lines, as if the page is too big for the screen? Or is it just my computer?
Does everyone else have to scroll back and forth to read the ends of the lines, as if the page is too big for the screen? Or is it just my computer?
EUREKA: Duck, Duck, Goose - Aug 09, 2007 - 01:17pm
Does everyone else have to scroll back and forth to read the ends of the lines, as if the page is too big for the screen? Or is it just my computer?
Does everyone else have to scroll back and forth to read the ends of the lines, as if the page is too big for the screen? Or is it just my computer?
Gibson, Allen Join DEATH RACE Remake - Jul 31, 2007 - 11:59am
Something tells me Paul W.S. Anderson is going to leave out the social satire. Let's just call it a hunch.
Something tells me Paul W.S. Anderson is going to leave out the social satire. Let's just call it a hunch.
Whedon Talks Future Horror Movie - Jul 31, 2007 - 11:46am
If anyone could write a movie where "abunch of coeds go to drink and have fun till theres a crazy mutant, evil spell from the book of the dead, or jsut plain crazy rednecks stalking them to eat them type movie ", it would be Joss Whedon. And I forgot who said it, but a "Buffy", "Angel", or another "Serenity" movie wouldn't bring in more fans, so much as just disappoint current ones. I'm sure he wants to move on to other things, too. Also, everyone, take some time to proofread your comments. I mean, really, show some class.
If anyone could write a movie where "abunch of coeds go to drink and have fun till theres a crazy mutant, evil spell from the book of the dead, or jsut plain crazy rednecks stalking them to eat them type movie ", it would be Joss Whedon. And I forgot who said it, but a "Buffy", "Angel", or another "Serenity" movie wouldn't bring in more fans, so much as just disappoint current ones. I'm sure he wants to move on to other things, too. Also, everyone, take some time to proofread your comments. I mean, really, show some class.
Warner Bros Updates on RUM DIARY - Jul 30, 2007 - 12:24pm
"Rum Diaries" was the first book of his I tried to read. "Tried to", meaning I was hoping for the crazy pschydelia and rant-astic prose I'd heard so much about. But the beginning seemed so slow, compared to what I was expecting. Since then, I've read "Hell's Angels", "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas", and "Fear and Loathing on The Campaign Trail '72". I may go back to The Rum Diary, but something about it seems like I might as well read the stuff he wrote after he found his voice than when he was trying things out. Plus, I resent him getting a book published at 22. But perhaps that's more of my fault. "Hell's Angels" is my favorite, though.
"Rum Diaries" was the first book of his I tried to read. "Tried to", meaning I was hoping for the crazy pschydelia and rant-astic prose I'd heard so much about. But the beginning seemed so slow, compared to what I was expecting. Since then, I've read "Hell's Angels", "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas", and "Fear and Loathing on The Campaign Trail '72". I may go back to The Rum Diary, but something about it seems like I might as well read the stuff he wrote after he found his voice than when he was trying things out. Plus, I resent him getting a book published at 22. But perhaps that's more of my fault. "Hell's Angels" is my favorite, though.
More Nights at the MUSEUM - Jul 30, 2007 - 12:16pm
Hey, they might as well. It's not like movie's going to resemble the script after the director, actors, studios, and focus groups get through with it. Even writing it as a "family comedy", and a sequal, and with Ben Stiller and Robin Willams in mind, they're going to get maybe one line they wrote into the film. Garant and Lennon might as well just take the money and then go do stuff that's actually good. Hell, there isn't even really a reason to pick them specifically, when the studios just look at writers like secretaries and don't even try to nurture original voices.
Hey, they might as well. It's not like movie's going to resemble the script after the director, actors, studios, and focus groups get through with it. Even writing it as a "family comedy", and a sequal, and with Ben Stiller and Robin Willams in mind, they're going to get maybe one line they wrote into the film. Garant and Lennon might as well just take the money and then go do stuff that's actually good. Hell, there isn't even really a reason to pick them specifically, when the studios just look at writers like secretaries and don't even try to nurture original voices.
LEGION OF MONSTERS: Morbius #1 - Jul 28, 2007 - 03:20pm
Dang it. And I just got back from the comic book store where I saw this, too.
Dang it. And I just got back from the comic book store where I saw this, too.
Fox Interested in HACK/SLASH? - Jul 28, 2007 - 01:09am
The comic book is basically a post-modern take on horror movies already (yes, I said "post-modern"). To adapt it into a movie would be a movie copying a comic book that's copying movies. But then, it's stuff like that that's made the comic book so irresistable. It's like Buffy is with vampires, in a good sense. Plus, it was already a play. If anything can be put on stage, then it's vitually guarrenteed to be be brilliant in a movie. I say that with all the theatre snobbery it implies.
The comic book is basically a post-modern take on horror movies already (yes, I said "post-modern"). To adapt it into a movie would be a movie copying a comic book that's copying movies. But then, it's stuff like that that's made the comic book so irresistable. It's like Buffy is with vampires, in a good sense. Plus, it was already a play. If anything can be put on stage, then it's vitually guarrenteed to be be brilliant in a movie. I say that with all the theatre snobbery it implies.
THOR #1 - Jul 18, 2007 - 11:59am
I think Civil War adds a level of complexity to Marvel's characters that I haven't seen in a long time. I'm going to enjoy it untill 2008, when Bush finally leaves and Marvel goes back to normal.
I think Civil War adds a level of complexity to Marvel's characters that I haven't seen in a long time. I'm going to enjoy it untill 2008, when Bush finally leaves and Marvel goes back to normal.
Casting troubles For WATCHMEN? - Jul 03, 2007 - 12:21pm
For once, this piece of news makes me feel better about the movie. In trying to get all those real life people (or, obviously, actors to play them) it looks like Snyder might actually make a politically scathing, culturally relavant, movie with some brass balls. But, then, I've been disappointed before. I guess I've never really considered the option that this might turn out good. Still...
For once, this piece of news makes me feel better about the movie. In trying to get all those real life people (or, obviously, actors to play them) it looks like Snyder might actually make a politically scathing, culturally relavant, movie with some brass balls. But, then, I've been disappointed before. I guess I've never really considered the option that this might turn out good. Still...
TEEN TITANS on the Move - May 31, 2007 - 12:07pm
Remember, when you get Akiva Goldsman ("Batman and Robin"), you get quality.
Remember, when you get Akiva Goldsman ("Batman and Robin"), you get quality.
Johnson Talks GORDON - May 24, 2007 - 12:41pm
But, actually, it sounds like it could be a good show. We'll just have to see...
But, actually, it sounds like it could be a good show. We'll just have to see...
Johnson Talks GORDON - May 24, 2007 - 12:21pm
Sorry,but Batman is the only super hero allowed to brag about not having super powers. He called it.
Sorry,but Batman is the only super hero allowed to brag about not having super powers. He called it.
Kooky & Creepy ADDAMS Head to Broadway - May 22, 2007 - 12:15pm
Few ideas have every made as much sense as "Adams Family: The Musical". It just screams "Rocky Horror", "Sweeny Todd", "Reefer Madness", and "Batboy". I now can't wait. And Thing's definately going to be in it. He'd better have a solo. ...just make sure they don't try it with "The Munsters".
Few ideas have every made as much sense as "Adams Family: The Musical". It just screams "Rocky Horror", "Sweeny Todd", "Reefer Madness", and "Batboy". I now can't wait. And Thing's definately going to be in it. He'd better have a solo. ...just make sure they don't try it with "The Munsters".
Hartnett Will Play in the RAIN - May 03, 2007 - 12:10pm
Wait...I don't get it. What's so dirty about the title?
Wait...I don't get it. What's so dirty about the title?
"Neuromancer" - Apr 23, 2007 - 12:04pm
I started reading this awhile ago, but had to put it down because the prose seemed so passive. That, or maybe I've just not been in the right mindset for it. I'll have to give it another shot. So, we'll see... I do like reading about versions of the future that were written in the past. Everytime I read the word "arcade", all I could think of was how my niece and nephew will look at those like we look at the 5 cent nickelodeans. Also, the "video rental store" will seem quant.
I started reading this awhile ago, but had to put it down because the prose seemed so passive. That, or maybe I've just not been in the right mindset for it. I'll have to give it another shot. So, we'll see... I do like reading about versions of the future that were written in the past. Everytime I read the word "arcade", all I could think of was how my niece and nephew will look at those like we look at the 5 cent nickelodeans. Also, the "video rental store" will seem quant.
"Neuromancer" - Apr 23, 2007 - 11:58am
I started reading this awhile ago, but had to put it down because the prose seemed so passive. That, or maybe I've just not been in the right mindset for it. I'll have to give it another shot. So, we'll see... I do like reading about versions of the future that were written in the past. Everytime I read the word "arcade", all I could think of was how my niece and nephew will look at those like we look at the 5 cent nickelodeans. Also, the "video rental store" will seem quant.
I started reading this awhile ago, but had to put it down because the prose seemed so passive. That, or maybe I've just not been in the right mindset for it. I'll have to give it another shot. So, we'll see... I do like reading about versions of the future that were written in the past. Everytime I read the word "arcade", all I could think of was how my niece and nephew will look at those like we look at the 5 cent nickelodeans. Also, the "video rental store" will seem quant.
Hollywood Writers and Mainstream Acceptance - Apr 11, 2007 - 02:32pm
As an aspiring writer who's tried comic scripts and screenplays, comic scripts are easier to write. But that's assuming you're comparing an issue of a comic to a 120 page screenplay. And, still, that's a huge generalization. As a former employee of a comic book shop, I can tell you that it's absolutely heartbreaking to tell someone their favorite comic book is delayed, especially if that's the only comic they buy or they traveled a long way to get it. As a comic book fan, it sucks as well. All this reminds me of how late Image comics were back in the 1990's, and I was told by those older than me that Camelot 3000 and Watchmen were months (if not, a full year) late as well. The problem with Image Comics was that they were so revolutionary at the time that people still bought them even if two issues came out a year. Only when sales are hurt dramatically, and they're hurting the devoted fans they still have, will things start to change. That, or there will be even more delays as the standard comic book just gets put straight into a tradepaperback. And as much as I follow writers more than characters (for the most part) if I'm not interested in buying it when it's on the shelf, then it doesn't matter when it came in.
As an aspiring writer who's tried comic scripts and screenplays, comic scripts are easier to write. But that's assuming you're comparing an issue of a comic to a 120 page screenplay. And, still, that's a huge generalization. As a former employee of a comic book shop, I can tell you that it's absolutely heartbreaking to tell someone their favorite comic book is delayed, especially if that's the only comic they buy or they traveled a long way to get it. As a comic book fan, it sucks as well. All this reminds me of how late Image comics were back in the 1990's, and I was told by those older than me that Camelot 3000 and Watchmen were months (if not, a full year) late as well. The problem with Image Comics was that they were so revolutionary at the time that people still bought them even if two issues came out a year. Only when sales are hurt dramatically, and they're hurting the devoted fans they still have, will things start to change. That, or there will be even more delays as the standard comic book just gets put straight into a tradepaperback. And as much as I follow writers more than characters (for the most part) if I'm not interested in buying it when it's on the shelf, then it doesn't matter when it came in.
Get ready for Horrorfest on March 27th! - Mar 21, 2007 - 11:36am
I only got to see one, Dark Ride, and it suuuuuuccccccked!!! It was the ultimate "Let's just make a horror film" movie. There's nothing original about it. Even if it was bad, there's be things to say about it. But they tell artists the one thing you can't do to the audience is bore them. This one did. So don't be fooled by the "too disturbing for general audiences". Perhaps the other ones are better, but there's other reasons Dark Ride didn't make it into mainstream theaters
I only got to see one, Dark Ride, and it suuuuuuccccccked!!! It was the ultimate "Let's just make a horror film" movie. There's nothing original about it. Even if it was bad, there's be things to say about it. But they tell artists the one thing you can't do to the audience is bore them. This one did. So don't be fooled by the "too disturbing for general audiences". Perhaps the other ones are better, but there's other reasons Dark Ride didn't make it into mainstream theaters
"Battlestar Galactica: Crossroads Part 1" - Mar 20, 2007 - 11:21am
I didn't think it would happen, but I'm now convinced that Baltar is innocent. The defense's opening statement did it. I'm now siding with Baltar. Of course, he still had a hand in the destruction of the colonies, but he's not on trial for that. And I don't think he's a Cylon. It's too obvious.
I didn't think it would happen, but I'm now convinced that Baltar is innocent. The defense's opening statement did it. I'm now siding with Baltar. Of course, he still had a hand in the destruction of the colonies, but he's not on trial for that. And I don't think he's a Cylon. It's too obvious.
Gerard Butler joins "Escape From New York" - Mar 13, 2007 - 12:30pm
Did I just read someone comparing Shakespeare drawing inspiration from folk tales to Hollywood remaking Escape From New York? Are you kidding me? Do you really think that's what the greenlighters upstair are thinking? Really? Most people wouldn't have a problem with remakes if they had something to say. In theatre, we ask "Why should we produce this play that may have been produced a thousand times before? How is it relevant to today?" Do you really think the greenlighters are asking that? Really? You would think that since they know they're going to make their money back, they could at least do something a little more to their remake (like The Mancurian Canidate). Don't ever compare the latest Hollywood biscuit treat to Shakespeare again.
Did I just read someone comparing Shakespeare drawing inspiration from folk tales to Hollywood remaking Escape From New York? Are you kidding me? Do you really think that's what the greenlighters upstair are thinking? Really? Most people wouldn't have a problem with remakes if they had something to say. In theatre, we ask "Why should we produce this play that may have been produced a thousand times before? How is it relevant to today?" Do you really think the greenlighters are asking that? Really? You would think that since they know they're going to make their money back, they could at least do something a little more to their remake (like The Mancurian Canidate). Don't ever compare the latest Hollywood biscuit treat to Shakespeare again.
"Battlestar Galactica: Maelstrom" - Mar 06, 2007 - 12:19pm
One of these days I'm going to figure out what you people are looking for in a TV show that keeps you from seeing how much these (you call) filler episodes rock. I know they don't have to do with the overall story (or they might, we'll see). But I'm loving the single story episodes. I think most of you are so eager for the ending you're expecting, you're not enjoying the little directions the show is taking. And how was that ending anticlimatic? I don't understand how that could be, especially when I can't really find where this review didn't like the episode enough to give it a "C+". Stop trying to predict how the show is going to end. Oh, and Starbuck's a Cylon....
One of these days I'm going to figure out what you people are looking for in a TV show that keeps you from seeing how much these (you call) filler episodes rock. I know they don't have to do with the overall story (or they might, we'll see). But I'm loving the single story episodes. I think most of you are so eager for the ending you're expecting, you're not enjoying the little directions the show is taking. And how was that ending anticlimatic? I don't understand how that could be, especially when I can't really find where this review didn't like the episode enough to give it a "C+". Stop trying to predict how the show is going to end. Oh, and Starbuck's a Cylon....
"Battlestar Galactica: Dirty Hands" - Feb 27, 2007 - 08:45am
I honestly thought you were going to just complain about this episode not having enough Cylons and how you hate "filler" episodes. I've loved all the episodes that most of you call "filler" because they're still great episodes. And I always seem to wonder (and it tends to happen with "genre" shows more than "mainstream" shows) why the better a series starts off, fans are so much quicker to point out its flaws once it shows some problem. "It was a great episode, but..." "Oh, it jumped the shark after the start of the third season." I figure the better the show, the more credit I give it when I see problems. Although, I guess its easier to tear down than build up. James Callis deserves an Emmy.
I honestly thought you were going to just complain about this episode not having enough Cylons and how you hate "filler" episodes. I've loved all the episodes that most of you call "filler" because they're still great episodes. And I always seem to wonder (and it tends to happen with "genre" shows more than "mainstream" shows) why the better a series starts off, fans are so much quicker to point out its flaws once it shows some problem. "It was a great episode, but..." "Oh, it jumped the shark after the start of the third season." I figure the better the show, the more credit I give it when I see problems. Although, I guess its easier to tear down than build up. James Callis deserves an Emmy.
"Battlestar Galactica: A Day on the Life" - Feb 21, 2007 - 12:14pm
Gosh, when did Mania get the balls to give bad reviews? I loved the episode. I think it was just as dramatic as it needed to be. It's a science fiction show, not "The Office". When you're creating a whole world with it's own set of rules, you need to have that high emotion to make those people real to the viewer (especially the much sought "mainstream viewer", as if there will be such a thing soon). All the aboved mentioned connections just got me even more hoped up about it. And, for the record, I love The Office for its subtley and comedy as much as I love Battlestar Galactica for it's drama and politics.
Gosh, when did Mania get the balls to give bad reviews? I loved the episode. I think it was just as dramatic as it needed to be. It's a science fiction show, not "The Office". When you're creating a whole world with it's own set of rules, you need to have that high emotion to make those people real to the viewer (especially the much sought "mainstream viewer", as if there will be such a thing soon). All the aboved mentioned connections just got me even more hoped up about it. And, for the record, I love The Office for its subtley and comedy as much as I love Battlestar Galactica for it's drama and politics.
Awards Shows, whatever … - Feb 19, 2007 - 08:51am
As much as I love a good story arc, I have to say I like the "filler" episodes too. I'm not so interested in if they find Earth, so much as the interaction of characters and the story. So far, most of the filler episodes have been better than the run of entire television shows.
As much as I love a good story arc, I have to say I like the "filler" episodes too. I'm not so interested in if they find Earth, so much as the interaction of characters and the story. So far, most of the filler episodes have been better than the run of entire television shows.
"Battlestar Galactica: The Woman King" - Feb 13, 2007 - 12:25pm
As much as I love big, giant, sweeping, serial story arcs that turn a TV show into an epic saga, I have to admit that a "filler" episode shows a true test of any series. Especially when they they have an episode so succinct you can show it to your friend without making them wade through either backstory, or several hours of episodes before something happens. I liked this episode. I was hoping for it to deal with Baltar. But if that's an overall story arc, I can't complain.
As much as I love big, giant, sweeping, serial story arcs that turn a TV show into an epic saga, I have to admit that a "filler" episode shows a true test of any series. Especially when they they have an episode so succinct you can show it to your friend without making them wade through either backstory, or several hours of episodes before something happens. I liked this episode. I was hoping for it to deal with Baltar. But if that's an overall story arc, I can't complain.
"The Sarah Silverman Program" - Feb 08, 2007 - 12:05pm
The whole time I watched this, I wondered if I was watching something really bad or borderline genius. If anything, it is what it wants to be. Most of my favorite TV shows were shows that I didn't like when I saw the first episode (Arrested Developement, Newsradio, 30 Rock, etc.), but once I got what they were doing, I loved them. I'm not saying that's going to be the case with this. But there is a part of me that hopes they keep it on just because so few networks take chances on TV shows anymore. Plus, Rob Scrab of "Scud: The Disposable Assassin" (the greatest comic book in the world) directed it. And Mania/Cinescape is always way too generous with rating anything. Any grade they give anything, I always take it down a letter.
The whole time I watched this, I wondered if I was watching something really bad or borderline genius. If anything, it is what it wants to be. Most of my favorite TV shows were shows that I didn't like when I saw the first episode (Arrested Developement, Newsradio, 30 Rock, etc.), but once I got what they were doing, I loved them. I'm not saying that's going to be the case with this. But there is a part of me that hopes they keep it on just because so few networks take chances on TV shows anymore. Plus, Rob Scrab of "Scud: The Disposable Assassin" (the greatest comic book in the world) directed it. And Mania/Cinescape is always way too generous with rating anything. Any grade they give anything, I always take it down a letter.
A Question of Taste - Jan 31, 2007 - 12:24pm
Hey, the guy's got to fill a weekly column. Sadly, too many times we look away from what offends/scares us, as opposed to facing it head on; or question why it offends/scares us. And isn't that what, ultimately, comic books try to teach us anyway? And, of course, movies and TV shows get more hype and controversy because they tend to be bigger, high profile, targets that get pumped into your TV. Comic books you have to go out and get. But, yeah, it's all just a context thing.
Hey, the guy's got to fill a weekly column. Sadly, too many times we look away from what offends/scares us, as opposed to facing it head on; or question why it offends/scares us. And isn't that what, ultimately, comic books try to teach us anyway? And, of course, movies and TV shows get more hype and controversy because they tend to be bigger, high profile, targets that get pumped into your TV. Comic books you have to go out and get. But, yeah, it's all just a context thing.
"Battlestar Galactica: Rapture" - Jan 25, 2007 - 04:10pm
I'm not a fan of the annoying pop ballads advirtising the Battlestar Galactica either. But, if it's one thing sci-fi shows need now (now that there are some good ones) is to appear accessible to the mainstream. Especially now that they've taken it off the eternal "geek night" (Friday) and thrown it up against every show on Sunday. And although I worry that the ratings will tank on Sundays, it seems like the sort of risk you need to take to grow, not that Sci-Fi Channel is going to dump Battlestar Galactica anytime soon. Now, if only they could promote Doctor Who as vigorously.
I'm not a fan of the annoying pop ballads advirtising the Battlestar Galactica either. But, if it's one thing sci-fi shows need now (now that there are some good ones) is to appear accessible to the mainstream. Especially now that they've taken it off the eternal "geek night" (Friday) and thrown it up against every show on Sunday. And although I worry that the ratings will tank on Sundays, it seems like the sort of risk you need to take to grow, not that Sci-Fi Channel is going to dump Battlestar Galactica anytime soon. Now, if only they could promote Doctor Who as vigorously.
"The Simpsons: The Wife Aquatic" - Jan 12, 2007 - 12:20pm
The Simpsons is dealing with what Saturday Night Live deals with now. It was a revolution when it came out, but after so long, it's become the norm. Most people that say "Family Guy" or "South Park" is better usually don't acknowledge that they are reactions off The Simpsons. I feel old, too. And I agree with the review too, even if I had to adjust my monacle to read it.
The Simpsons is dealing with what Saturday Night Live deals with now. It was a revolution when it came out, but after so long, it's become the norm. Most people that say "Family Guy" or "South Park" is better usually don't acknowledge that they are reactions off The Simpsons. I feel old, too. And I agree with the review too, even if I had to adjust my monacle to read it.
David Tennant to leave "Doctor Who" - Dec 29, 2006 - 01:13pm
David Tennant is the Tenth Doctor. A timelord has 13 lives total. He could always have a son....eh? eh? I feel bad for Paul McGann, the Eigth Doctor, who only appeared in the 1996 TV movie. Here you get this dream role, and the pilot doesn't even get picked up. However, his version of The Doctor lived on in the magazine for nine years, making him the longest serving Doctor (with, by far, the least amount of work).
David Tennant is the Tenth Doctor. A timelord has 13 lives total. He could always have a son....eh? eh? I feel bad for Paul McGann, the Eigth Doctor, who only appeared in the 1996 TV movie. Here you get this dream role, and the pilot doesn't even get picked up. However, his version of The Doctor lived on in the magazine for nine years, making him the longest serving Doctor (with, by far, the least amount of work).
David Tennant to leave "Doctor Who" - Dec 29, 2006 - 09:13am
Yeah, I was scared there, too, for a second. Especially since I finally saw the end of season 2 a few days ago. Then I saw that their sources are the British tabloids (who makes Fox News look fair and balanced). I hope Tennant stays on for a good, long while, even though, for story purposes, I'm glad Eccleston left. Bare in mind, Eccleston was a better Doctor, but I'm glad he left after completeing one fantastic season, instead of pushing his luck. And, no, it's not considered sacrilege by sci-fi fans to not like Doctor Who. It should be. But, it's not.
Yeah, I was scared there, too, for a second. Especially since I finally saw the end of season 2 a few days ago. Then I saw that their sources are the British tabloids (who makes Fox News look fair and balanced). I hope Tennant stays on for a good, long while, even though, for story purposes, I'm glad Eccleston left. Bare in mind, Eccleston was a better Doctor, but I'm glad he left after completeing one fantastic season, instead of pushing his luck. And, no, it's not considered sacrilege by sci-fi fans to not like Doctor Who. It should be. But, it's not.
Small Screen, Big Screen: Star Trek - Dec 19, 2006 - 02:04pm
That's probably the best defense I've ever heard of "Wrath of Khan". Most people just say, "They couldn't show as much blood as they can today." To which I cringe at the lack of faith older people have in our tastes and understanding of context. However, I'm still sticking with my original points. I'll admit, a part of me is now thinking I need to see it a fifth time. But it shouldn't take five viewing in ten years of a movie to like it. And, see, Shinzon also took out the Romunlan empire. And is just a much more formitable villian. I've never really gotten that sense of urgency and stakes when it comes to "Wrath of Khan". And I don't recall it being such a great space battle. Data also made quite a sacrifice to save his Enterprise (even getting Picard out of there), and it was a hell of alot more dramatic than Spock's death. Khan just needs more Wrath.
That's probably the best defense I've ever heard of "Wrath of Khan". Most people just say, "They couldn't show as much blood as they can today." To which I cringe at the lack of faith older people have in our tastes and understanding of context. However, I'm still sticking with my original points. I'll admit, a part of me is now thinking I need to see it a fifth time. But it shouldn't take five viewing in ten years of a movie to like it. And, see, Shinzon also took out the Romunlan empire. And is just a much more formitable villian. I've never really gotten that sense of urgency and stakes when it comes to "Wrath of Khan". And I don't recall it being such a great space battle. Data also made quite a sacrifice to save his Enterprise (even getting Picard out of there), and it was a hell of alot more dramatic than Spock's death. Khan just needs more Wrath.
Small Screen, Big Screen: Star Trek - Dec 19, 2006 - 01:31pm
HudsonTaco: I think with most movies its about the timing. Its how some movies are ahead of their time and some are long past it. Then, most people hate the new stuff because it's different from when they were a kid, and nostalgia tells them nothing will ever be that good. Plus, it makes them feel old. I already get that when I watch MTV and/or see any new Saturday morning cartoons (although I can make a case for why they're better). And as for a new Star Trek movie, why retread in the past? You're not going to get a new audience with a new actor playing Kirk, because that's Shatner's role. Kirk isn't Superman, or James Bond, or Doctor Who. And if they put Matt Damon in it, we're all just going to say, "Hey, look, there's Matt Damon in a Starfleet uniform". They need to take a hint from Battlestar Galactica (the new one, for those born before '82) and make it about people and their situation, then make the franchise relavant again. Follow that, and you can do whatever you want to Star Trek.
HudsonTaco: I think with most movies its about the timing. Its how some movies are ahead of their time and some are long past it. Then, most people hate the new stuff because it's different from when they were a kid, and nostalgia tells them nothing will ever be that good. Plus, it makes them feel old. I already get that when I watch MTV and/or see any new Saturday morning cartoons (although I can make a case for why they're better). And as for a new Star Trek movie, why retread in the past? You're not going to get a new audience with a new actor playing Kirk, because that's Shatner's role. Kirk isn't Superman, or James Bond, or Doctor Who. And if they put Matt Damon in it, we're all just going to say, "Hey, look, there's Matt Damon in a Starfleet uniform". They need to take a hint from Battlestar Galactica (the new one, for those born before '82) and make it about people and their situation, then make the franchise relavant again. Follow that, and you can do whatever you want to Star Trek.
Small Screen, Big Screen: Star Trek - Dec 19, 2006 - 12:57pm
HudsonTaco: First off, I didn't say Nemesis was as good as Khan, I said it was better. Second, although I don't need a Star Trek film to be scary, I'd like the villians to at least be formatible (athough, the Borg in "First Contact", definately scary). I do agree with your list, for the most part (outside of the above mentioned). And, yeah, Chang's better than Lloyd. And, in fact, I was born in 1982. But don't let that fool you. Perhaps "Khan" was good when it came out, but nobody like a story that ends with "you had to be there" ;-).
HudsonTaco: First off, I didn't say Nemesis was as good as Khan, I said it was better. Second, although I don't need a Star Trek film to be scary, I'd like the villians to at least be formatible (athough, the Borg in "First Contact", definately scary). I do agree with your list, for the most part (outside of the above mentioned). And, yeah, Chang's better than Lloyd. And, in fact, I was born in 1982. But don't let that fool you. Perhaps "Khan" was good when it came out, but nobody like a story that ends with "you had to be there" ;-).
Small Screen, Big Screen: Star Trek - Dec 19, 2006 - 12:24pm
I don't think I'll ever understand the hate that "Star Trek: Nemesis" gets. I loved it. I refer to it as "Wrath of Khan", but good. Perhaps I should make it clear that I've watched Wrath of Khan four times, and I just don't see the appeal of it. I know, that's heresy in the Star Trek fanbase. But, Khan isn't scary. He's just not. Christopher Lloyd as a Klingon is scarier than Khan... (spoiler warning) ...He kills Kirk's son, kills one of his own men, and blows up the Enterprise. What did Khan do? He put a worm in Chekov's ear. Oh, and Spock died by accident. Oh, and Khan controlled the Enterprise by remote control for almost four minutes. Come on! And although "Nemesis" is virtually the same plot as "Wrath of Khan", it juices it up. Data's death is even better than Spock's, and I like Spock.... (end of spoilers) ...Why does everyone else get off on "Khan"? And don't tell me it was the timing of its release or the unexpectedness of said scenes above, or that I have to watch the TV episode Khan is in first (where he was desent). I'd like to know what the appeal of "Wrath of Khan" is now.
I don't think I'll ever understand the hate that "Star Trek: Nemesis" gets. I loved it. I refer to it as "Wrath of Khan", but good. Perhaps I should make it clear that I've watched Wrath of Khan four times, and I just don't see the appeal of it. I know, that's heresy in the Star Trek fanbase. But, Khan isn't scary. He's just not. Christopher Lloyd as a Klingon is scarier than Khan... (spoiler warning) ...He kills Kirk's son, kills one of his own men, and blows up the Enterprise. What did Khan do? He put a worm in Chekov's ear. Oh, and Spock died by accident. Oh, and Khan controlled the Enterprise by remote control for almost four minutes. Come on! And although "Nemesis" is virtually the same plot as "Wrath of Khan", it juices it up. Data's death is even better than Spock's, and I like Spock.... (end of spoilers) ...Why does everyone else get off on "Khan"? And don't tell me it was the timing of its release or the unexpectedness of said scenes above, or that I have to watch the TV episode Khan is in first (where he was desent). I'd like to know what the appeal of "Wrath of Khan" is now.
Politics in Comics or The Follies of Didacticism - Nov 30, 2006 - 03:00pm
To keep this as short as I can: I think believing Jesus was the son of God is like believing Santa Claus is real (a historical figure being mythologized). In that regard, I can only say that I think Christianity is wrong in order to stay true to what I believe (perhaps I should say "incorrect"). To be quite frank about it, Christianity taught me that. Perhaps that doesn't use the best tact, but it gets a reaction and a rise out of people, and I don't think we do enough of that in the USA. And as much as I'd love to get into the debate (we've also lost the art of debate), it would lead to far too long of a rant for the message board, and would need opposition to keep on topic.
To keep this as short as I can: I think believing Jesus was the son of God is like believing Santa Claus is real (a historical figure being mythologized). In that regard, I can only say that I think Christianity is wrong in order to stay true to what I believe (perhaps I should say "incorrect"). To be quite frank about it, Christianity taught me that. Perhaps that doesn't use the best tact, but it gets a reaction and a rise out of people, and I don't think we do enough of that in the USA. And as much as I'd love to get into the debate (we've also lost the art of debate), it would lead to far too long of a rant for the message board, and would need opposition to keep on topic.
Politics in Comics or The Follies of Didacticism - Nov 29, 2006 - 12:14pm
Sure, this column should be kept to talking about comics. But, man, if you got something to say, say it. There's nothing wrong with telling people what they "ought to think" because people have the right to agree or disagree if they want. Everything's connected, and if Northstar decides to come out of the closet, a whole bunch of people much less qualifed people (moms) are going to scream loud about it anyway. You'd better weigh in on the national debate, because you have much more readers than a lot of people on the internet. If they disagree, there's always the comments section. And I'd rather everyone in the world speak their mind than stay silent. This attitude of just letting people believe what they want is good, don't get me wrong. But when a person believes something that is wrong (Bush should stay in power, Jesus was the son of God), they need to be challenged on it. And, I agree. Comics need to inspire, not preach, just so long as they still inspire. At least if they preach they have something to say, as opposed to the creators who say, "I just want to write a book that harkens back to the escapism and fantasy from when I was a kid." Escapism is a cop out.
Sure, this column should be kept to talking about comics. But, man, if you got something to say, say it. There's nothing wrong with telling people what they "ought to think" because people have the right to agree or disagree if they want. Everything's connected, and if Northstar decides to come out of the closet, a whole bunch of people much less qualifed people (moms) are going to scream loud about it anyway. You'd better weigh in on the national debate, because you have much more readers than a lot of people on the internet. If they disagree, there's always the comments section. And I'd rather everyone in the world speak their mind than stay silent. This attitude of just letting people believe what they want is good, don't get me wrong. But when a person believes something that is wrong (Bush should stay in power, Jesus was the son of God), they need to be challenged on it. And, I agree. Comics need to inspire, not preach, just so long as they still inspire. At least if they preach they have something to say, as opposed to the creators who say, "I just want to write a book that harkens back to the escapism and fantasy from when I was a kid." Escapism is a cop out.
Doctor Who - The Complete First Season - Nov 17, 2006 - 05:32pm
Finally, you guys review the first season of the new Doctor Who I have to disagree about Russel T. Davis's scripts and the ending of the season. To call it Deus ex machina cheapens it, outside from the fact that its totally inaccurate. I would call it one of the best sci-fi television moments in history, and an ending so many other shows should take note from. Unfortunatley, I can't defend it anymore without giving stuff away. But I will say it's by far one of the most solid endings to a season of TV ever. It makes the whole thing like more of an epic mini-series. And I've made two of my friends watch the entire thing that agree with me.
Finally, you guys review the first season of the new Doctor Who I have to disagree about Russel T. Davis's scripts and the ending of the season. To call it Deus ex machina cheapens it, outside from the fact that its totally inaccurate. I would call it one of the best sci-fi television moments in history, and an ending so many other shows should take note from. Unfortunatley, I can't defend it anymore without giving stuff away. But I will say it's by far one of the most solid endings to a season of TV ever. It makes the whole thing like more of an epic mini-series. And I've made two of my friends watch the entire thing that agree with me.
Mania is the premiere online destination for fans of science fiction, fantasy, horror, and anime entertainment. It is the largest community offering profiles, video, science fiction movies, sci fi TV, art, sci fi comics, photos, cheats, blogs, science fiction books, forums and feedback. Mania offers insider entertainment industry info and original content for science fiction, fantasy, and horror entertainment genres including: video games, comics, gadgets, movies, television, toys, music, books, DVDs and more. © Mania Entertainment, LLC. 2001 - 2008
I got to admit, I liked the old look better. And here I thought I was just resistant to change. But, I do like these avatars, though.