What Would Jessica Chobot Do?


Long Live The New Flesh!

By: Jessica Chobot
Date: Monday, March 26, 2007

**Potential spoilers** 

I’ve been really into “techie” movies of late. As stated in my previous article (WWJCD: Nanobots, Cybernetics and Androids, Oh MY!), movies such as Tron and books like Neuromancer have been my past time du jour. 

As with all great and illustrious hobbies, one comes across the good and the bad. In my case, the bad (or the phenomenally good dependant upon your point of view) has been represented by a cult classic B-movie known as: Videodrome. 

So, what is Videodrome?  

Videodrome is a 1983 film, directed by David Cronenberg and featuring James Woods as Max Renn, the president of cable station CIVIC-TV and Debbie Harry from the band Blondie as a relationship radio therapist by the name Niki Brand.  

Things in Max’s life are normal or as normal as can be for a struggling cable station that peddles Skinamax-grade soft core porn. When his hacker/smut provider buddy stumbles upon the scrambled signal of the snuff film, Videodrome, Max finds himself sinking deeper and deeper into the seedy underbelly of burgeoning technology, mind control, government experimental weaponry, S&M, torture and murder. 


Videodrome is so awful, its genius. Terrible special effects, ridiculous one-liners, decidedly un-sexy sex scenes and James Wood’s ass are more than enough to qualify this movie as “cultish”. However what really sticks out is its underlying theme. On the first layer, you have the basic plot, which anyone who watches the film can come to understand. You get the story of Max, how he becomes intertwined within the underworld of illicit video and human exploitation. All of it is pretty straight-forward stuff. 

However, the second layer is infinitely more intriguing. If one looks at Videodrome as a sociological commentary piece rather than a simple cult flick, questions regarding how the early 80’s viewed technology and its potential dangers crop up. With the right perspective, one could easily look at Videodrome as a political horror film. 

The hacking, scrambling mind control aspects that Cronenberg depicts within his film seems to be a primary motif within most early tech movies created in the 1980s. Both Videodrome and Tron take the main character and “alter” them in some way. For Tron it was by taking Flynn and transforming him into a program for insertion within the Master Control’s mainframe. In Videodrome, Max’s body is disfigured and his thoughts and actions under a government weapon supplier’s control. Much like Flynn, Max also transfigures into a hi-tech warrior of sorts, but more as a revolutionary/terrorist than a savior. This rebel theme makes sense due to the fact that the Cold War was still going strong and Americans were fearful about their place within the World’s future. 

What doesn’t make much sense to me is the obvious distrust within the film regarding the female species. The movie has a heavy “twisted female” theme running throughout. While most of the main females within the movie are strong, they are also highly suspicious and are given an air of abnormality.  Debbie’s character, Niki, is a respected radio personality who offers up well-intentioned but hard hitting relationship advice. Portrayed as a dominant female within a man’s world, her “perversion” is addressed later when she quickly sleeps with Max without wanting or hinting at a romantic relationship outside of base sex. Niki then ups the ante for both Max and the viewer when her sadomasochistic nature is revealed and her foolish remarks of wanting to audition for Videodrome are voiced. 

The other strong female within the movie is Bianca O’Blivion who is the daughter of the late Professor Brian O’Blivion (the guru behind the advancements of video interaction). Portrayed as a tight-assed, Nazi-esque, emotionally deficient female, Bianca succeeds in her goals and plans for both her father and Max, however, her achievements are undermined due to her emphasized lack of femininity.  Somehow, one is left feeling bad for Bianca because of her cold heart and disposition rather than the loss of her father and her constant battles against Spectacular Optical. 

Last but not least is the VHS/vagina opening that Max “hallucinates” has formed on his torso and is the way that Barry Convex and his minions manage to control Max’s mind. This vaginal/cassette opening is the source of nothing but corruption. It is the way that Convex forces Max to become a murderer but also is what allows Bianca O’Blivion to “reprogram” Max and make him aware of “The new flesh.” Yet, being aware of the new flesh does little to save Max and his flesh in real life. Rather than Bianca showing Max salvation, she just ends up giving him a new choice, allowing him to select for himself which pathway to Hell he prefers to tread. 

Outside of these three major examples, there are other, more obvious tones of animosity towards the female. The knowledge that Niki has been captured, tortured and killed by those from Spectacular Optical, the exploitation pornography that Max airs on his cable station, the hallucinations that Max endures which feature a sexually charged Niki trapped within the television and Videodrome and Bianca O’Blivion having to live with the loss of her father while trying to carry on his legacy at the cost of her personal existence. 

It’s surprising how these themes were so blatantly obvious to me while watching this film. In fact, I remember turning to my friend and making the comment, “I can’t believe how frightened people in the ‘80s were about technology and vaginas!” 

This gives me cause to stop and pause and wonder how much, if any, things have changed since the ‘80s till now with how quickly technology has advanced and will continue to do so. Has society become more comfortable with the advancements one comes across almost everyday? Will there be a level at which we simply cannot go any further? If so, once we hit that level, where do we go from there? 

All I have to say about that is….. 

Death to Videodrome! Long Live the New Flesh!


More Content By Jessica Chobot
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
michaelxaviermaelstrom • Mar 26, 2007, 04:17am •
I think you've put your finger on the Vagina ..issue ..Jessica.

*pause*

Excuse me a moment please.

v-Lower-Blind.

*fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap*

VaginaAAaaaAaaaaAAaAAaAAaAaAAaaAAaaAaaa.

Frank Burns.

Rue Mclanahan.

Rosie O'Donnell.

Shatner.

^-Raise-Blind.

Sorry, relapse, all less-erect now.

(there was no way that he was going to be able to take "Jessica Chobot" and "Vagina" in the same sentence without something like that happening - Ed)

And I'm not responsible either Ed, she's even hotter than her usual level of scorching hotosity in that new Mania photo where she's so pertly wielding a gun.

*pause*

v-Lower-Blind.

(oh no, you're going to have to do that later, we're on a clock here Maelstrom - Ed)

^Raise-Blind.

*Shake fist* Damn you Ed.

Yes, good point, Cronenberg does indeed appear to have a fixation on genitals in films.

He explores Vaginas again in another of my fave films: DEAD RINGERS.

(with twin gynecologists no less - Ed)

the sexual relationship both brothers have with the central woman in their life seems...Vaginally symbolic.

plus Cronenberg's not only fixated on the Vagina but the the cock-Roach and the cock-Penis too.

Come to think of it there is faaaaar too much penis-roach imagery in NAKED LUNCH.

and then there's that fascination with banging the nearly dead and any sort of open fissure or approximation of a scarred vagina in CRASH ..

and then we're back to Vaginas again in THE FLY

(what vagina imagery was there in The Fly? - Ed)

oh c'mon Geena Davis is a massive Vagina Ed.

She's impossibly Tall and Beautiful and Intelligent, she represents the male fear of the extremely large vagina that can rip your masculinity and ID off with a contraction.

Yes, come to think of it Jessica, Cronenberg is a pretty disturbed fellow genitally speaking.

Must be why I enjoy his films.

He knows how to get under our skin.

or in our skin

or under our foreskin.

Whatever.

Point being, I think he well represents the love/hate fear/desire fondle/grope and massage-clitorus fascination with the Vagina (and what it represents, which is judgement - Ed) that all men psychologically grapple over, to a certain degree.

Why does Cronenberg present the Vagina metaphorically as something to be feared?

If I had to guess, it's because men fear the vagina.

On deep probing ..analysis, It represents everything to us.

It is motherhood, it is love, it is lust, it is life, it is control, it is judgment of our value.

In some respects deep within the primordial essence of man, the Vagina is the physical manifestation of God itself.

Until you figure out how to get God off.

There's something about God writhing around screaming in tongues how much she loves you as she gesticulates wildly and offers you her soul as you bring her over the edge of the waterfall and hold her there., that makes God slightly less intimidating.

v-Lower-Blind.

(no, bad, later - Ed)

AHHHHH Bitch.

(well, it makes God slightly less intimidating until she gives you that look, you know the one - Ed)

What was the question again?

Oh right, Has society become more comfortable with technology or will we forever fear it as some men do the Vagina?

Yes.

I think the older people get, the more they fear death, the more they fear loss of control, the more they fear loss of familiarity, the more they fear change.

ergo it's likely fear of new technology will remain a part of society for as long as we continue to have old people in the world.

But since everyone eventually gets over their fear of Vaginas and dives in

v-Lower-Blind.

(no, bad - Ed)

..there ought be plenty of new younger people to see to it that the world keeps inventing new technologies for those of us that are immortal to play with.

(I think he means immoral - Ed)

To blazes with fear!

Upward and Onward (and especially Inward!) I say!

As usual, a bloody good thought-provoking column Mrs. Chobot.


Jakester • Mar 26, 2007, 08:42am •
I'm not sure I even know how to follow-up on Laughing Boy's masturbations.

Yeah...Cronenberg's all weird about the coot (Dead Ringers, too, what with the twince being gynecologists).

Good take on Videodrome, Jess. I haven't seen it in a very long time (like when it first hit video or cable in the 80s).

Merin • Mar 26, 2007, 09:40am •
It's been awhile since I saw Videodrome - I think it was when I was working at a video rental in college. I remember thinking it was very strange.

I don't remember feeling any misogynistic overtones when I saw it, but I also probably didn't think "vagina" when they were shoving stuff in his stomach.

While the women were not "pure" or even normal, I don't think the men were nice guys either. Your protagonist runs a sleazy tv station using soft-core porn to make a living, not exactly a shining beacon of society. I think everyone in that film is basically damaged goods.

Since your on the 'techie" kick, JC, I'd recommend Neal Stephenson's books if you haven't read them. Snow Crash, in particular, I think you'd enjoy. Especially if you liked Neuromancer.

Another good column!

Jakester • Mar 26, 2007, 04:49pm •
No, not Stephenson! I can't even finish Cyrptonomicon it's so dry, and uh...oh yeah...DULL! Every once in a while, I try and go back and finish it, and quickly remember that the story's so boring that I don't care.

blinkbomber • Mar 26, 2007, 06:24pm •
yes! im so glad someone gave this movie some credit in the "looking back on..." department. i love this movie. the scene where james is making love to the tv freaked me out as a kid. Cronenburg rocks. props to ya.

michaelxaviermaelstrom • Mar 26, 2007, 06:57pm •
I'd sugg "The Jessica Chobot Paraphilia"

(coming soon by michael maelstrom no doubt - Ed)

or if you insist on reading something that has actually been writ and published by someone saner..

"THE COSMO KAMA SUTRA" (77 positions sugged by the editors of Cosmopolitan - Ed)

..that one of my kidnap victims/temporary-GF's (curiously - Ed) stuck inside a dilapidated copy of FHM-UK magazine and left surreptitiously open on the back of the john.

(or how about "LOOSE WOMEN, LECHEROUS MEN: A Feminist Philosophy of Sex (including "Challenging the Normal and the Perverse: Feminist Speculations on Sexual Preference" did your last victim slash GF leave you that one too? - Ed)

uh nein, I picked that one up on my own.

Started reading it sort of like THE VAGINA MONOLOGUES, just wanted to see what sorts of looks I'd get if I held the book up and read it aloud in Chapters book store.

but then after being escorted off the premises and I went back and slaughtered the security guard, and continued reading, I thought they were pretty good.

yeah CRYPTONOMICON is a tomb.

I like it but I like lengthy intricate shit sometimes, just ask my proctologist, it's what happens when you start out reading Asimov & Clarke in your crib, you develop this resistance to lengthy literary math stuff most people in their right mind wouldn't take.

Stephenson's SNOW CRASH is a good read though, a sort of a cross between Douglas Adams and William Gibson, but Nothing tops GIBSON'S SPRAWL TRILOGY in my books.

(NEUROMANCER, COUNT ZERO, MONALISA OVERDRIVE - Ed)

and I'd toss in Gibson's BURNING CHROME in there too.

and some RUDY RUCKER.

and THE MIRROR SHADES ANTHOLOGY when Burning Chrome has de-rezed from multiple reading wear.


michaelxaviermaelstrom • Mar 26, 2007, 07:10pm •

P.S: Anyone else find it curious that in the same message in which Jessica mentions Vaginas she tops the article with a new photo of her wielding a gun and smiling at the holes she's put inside the metaphoric man with her dead-on aim?

My kind of homicidal insane femme.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


BryanWay • Mar 26, 2007, 07:29pm •
This is my favorite movie. The effects aren't bad, they were, in fact, revolutionary. The dialogue is corny at times, but only because it has to be. The sex scenes are unsexy for a reason as well, but I agree with just about everything else you wrote. Way to do Videodrome justice.

Merin • Mar 26, 2007, 08:09pm •
I haven't tried Cryptonomicon yet myself, nor, to be honest, any other Stephenson other than Snow Crash. But Snow Crash was REALLY intriguing and fun. I have The Diamond Age to read of his next, but it's in a pile of TOO MANY books right now. Long Dark Tea Time of the Soul, The God Delusion, Anansi Boys and The Laughing Corpse are the various books I am reading right now, and I think Aspirin's latest Myth gets added next.

Snow Crash wasn't any harder to read than Neuromancer is, IMO.

Jakester • Mar 26, 2007, 08:54pm •
Hmm...lest I lose my rep...Jess, any chance of your vagina making an appearance in a videogame or...better yet...a movie?

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!