Television Review
5 Comments | Add a Comment

0


LOST - Everybody Hates Hugo

By: Jason Davis
Date: Monday, October 17, 2005

It seems that the quality of a LOST episode is oftentimes tied to the uniqueness of the character whose backstory appears in that installment. While TV audiences have had any number of Jack Shepards over the years, John Locke and Hugo Reyes are the sorts of characters not often offered up in a medium obsessed with cops, lawyers, and doctors. As a result, insights into the workings of these two everymen make for compelling tales of the human condition. With a strong emphasis on theme, and a marvelous performance by the always dependable Jorge Garcia, "Everyone Hates Hugo" is LOST at its best.

Speaking of Locke and Hurley, it's interesting to note that the latter's manager, Randy, is played by the same actor who played Locke's co-worker Randy in "Walkabout." Clearly, the creators are having fun layering these strange coincidences into their world and, if the audience is lucky, these bits and pieces will eventually evolve into something more substantial. In other casting, Sam Anderson makes a welcome appearance as one of the tail-section survivors, though his omission from the regular cast makes it likely that he won't be prominently featured on a weekly basis. Writer/producers Adam Horowitz and Edward Kitsis provide a welcome return to the airwaves for Marguerite Moreau, an alum of their previous ABC series life as we know it. Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje and Cynthia Watros join the regulars alongside Michelle Rodriguez in a move that will add yet another wrinkle to the cast chemistry should the tail section meet up with the other survivors. On that note, Charlie's comment that he wasn't part of "the A-Team" that went to the Black Rock echoes the final sentiments of Dr. Artz, who accused Shepard and company of being the island's elite. The stratification of survivors, originally between regular cast members and extras is now developing a third level with acolytes of the Dharma Initiative creating a new social group of secret keepers above and beyond their former cohorts.

The notion of jobs becoming important again to those maintaining the Dharma facility is nicely counterpointed by Hurley's flashbacks that have him abandoning work in the aftermath of his success. His friend, well assayed by DJ Qualls, does a stunning job of bringing home the sense of betrayal evoked by the revelation that he's quit his job without a net, but that Hurley is a millionaire. Charlie, similarly, hammers home the sentiment that Hurley's status as keeper of the comestibles has alienated him like his wealth did in his previous life. Both stories, built from the same material coalesce into a fine climax that sees Hurley evolve in a fashion that both completes this story while serving the overall arc of the series.

Interestingly enough, the editors of the TWIN PEAKS magazine Wrapped in Plastic included an article in the recently published issue 74 comparing LOST to that show much as I did a week or so ago. Their conclusions are well worth a perusal and make a number of excellent points about areas in which LOST is better set up for success that TWIN PEAKS ever was--a conclusion that's being born out as this season increases in quality week to week.



Related Products
Comments/Responses
1
• Oct 17, 2005, 03:03am •
LOST is so far one of well written stories in TV today. I hope it doesnt turn to become the next x-files. Strong start soft ending. If you put the story on hold people might lose interest in the long run. I am sure the lostaways dont want to be in Hawaii that long. They got a Life you know.

• Oct 17, 2005, 06:16am •
"While TV audiences have had any number of Jack Shepards over the years..."

Really? Tormented surgeons whose lack of interpersonal skills and misplaced ideals screwed up their personal lives, and who, given a second chance, become reluctant community leaders who make unpopular decisions? No, we may have seen DOCTORS before, but we certainly have not had "...any number of Jack Shepards over the years". That's like saying that every cop who has ever appeared on TV is exactly the same, whereas characters like Dan Muldoon, Joe Friday, Vic Mackey, Andy Sipowicz, and Gil Grissom are nothing alike. Reducing all characters to general types is pretty weak, especially when the reduction doesn't stand up to casual observation. Oh, and it's spelled "Arzt," not "Artz".

• Oct 17, 2005, 09:29am •
"While TV audiences have had any number of Jack Shepards over the years..."

A better analogy would have been...

"While TV audiences have had any number of hunky doctors over the years..."

Hurley is fat and Locke is bald and middle-aged, and they lead bland, everyman lives. We rarely see Hollywood put actors in lead drama story lines who won't make loins quiver with their good looks, talent, wealth, power, etc.

mckracken • Oct 17, 2005, 01:13pm •
Twin Peaks was ahead of its time, and nobody "got it" in contrast, this means LOST has found its time and place! people finally get it, get into the characters too.
4 8 15 16 23 42

• Nov 02, 2005, 06:03pm •
Without Twin Peaks, there would never have been a LOST. But the 'problem' with TP was the David-Lynch style, which probably alienated (and still does) a lot of people. With LOST, the characters and stories are easier to rely to, which makes them of wider appeal. Personally, though, I loved the atmosphere of TP much more than LOST.

1
Login to post a comment!