Yw PJ!! Much much deserved

I wouldnt agree that frame rate would help make cgi look more real, without motion blur you would be less likely to accept that the goblin king was there and more inclined to believe its fake. The only way cgi is ever going to look like real is by enchancements made to computer animation, not frame rates.

Nothing is innovative about high frame rates, its been around for a very long time. Heck, most news is broadcast in higher frame rates. 

Maybe it eventually works but I dont want the hobbit looking like a documentary, you lose the epicness of the film.

 Hmmm .....No, I'm gonna have to disagree. The fast fps made it look pretty damn real to me. It was pretty awesome.

Piece of sh%t movie! These movies blow! Can't they make a movie less nerdy? This is something geeks, nerds, and dorks enjoy; guys who dress up and reenact the lord of the rings. Defenitely not watching this crap...

 dragonrojo-I agree. Fu*cK THESE MOVIES!! Fu*CK THEM ALLL!!!!! Fu*CK THE NERDS AND GEEKS!!!  LOL

Fu*ck these movies and fans! Stupid waste of time!

 YES!! YES!! Fu*cK them!! FU*CK THEM ALLLLL!!! Bwahahhaaha!!!

You mad bro?

 Hey wise, I was wondering if I sound "badass" like rojo? I wanna be a badass too...

Geeks are gonna rule the world.  You'd better make movies for us to enjoy!

I saw it yesterday in regular old 2D with the 24 frame rate and enjoyed it very much.  But there were a few scenes that looked a little fake to me.   

And a few scenes that just bent my suspension of disbelief a little too much.  Some of the scenes of people falling from great heights and surviving without a scratch, especially in the fight in the goblin king's cave, were a little... farfetched.  And is it wrong that I can totally accept that a sleigh is pulled by magic rabbits but be bothered by the fact that the runners worked so well on dirt and rocks, not snow like you'd expect?