Mania Review: Battle Royale 3D - Mania.com



Mania Grade: A

8 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

  • Starring: Beat Takeshi, Ntatsuya Fujiwara, Aki Maeda and TarĂ´ Yamamoto
  • Written by: Kinji Fukasaku
  • Directed by: Kinji Fukasaku
  • Studio: Anchor Bay Entertainment
  • Rating: NR
  • Run Time: 114 minutes
  • Series:

Mania Review: Battle Royale 3D

Damn hippie kids...

By Rob Vaux     May 25, 2012

The immense success of The Hunger Gamers has prompted the seemingly inevitable rerelease of Battle Royale, a 2000 Japanese film with a similar theme and an immense cult following. That’s cause for celebration; the decision to release it in 3D isn’t. Battle Royale needed no such tricks to sell us the first time around, and jacking up the theater price for a movie that’s readily available on DVD won’t win it any new fans. But the movie industry is nothing without its wild unfounded hopes, and with the 3D conversion finished for Japan in 2010 (right after Avatar sent the whole concept into orbit), they basically lose nothing but a little extra gravy.

If you haven’t seen the film, I’d urge a DVD or Blu-ray screening rather than trudging out to the theaters. It scale remains surprisingly intimate and a decent HD TV should give you a wonderful experience without submitting to obscene ticket prices. And it absolutely demands a look if you haven’t yet seen it. While The Hunger Games gained a certain measure of inspiration from it, the two films spin the same basic concept into wildly different directions. Specifically, The Hunger Games took it all extremely seriously, while Battle Royale views it as a huge opportunity for social satire. The gender gap is on the rise in Japan, as young people strain against the expectations of traditional cultural mores and their elders wonder what civilization is coming to. Battle Royale pokes merciless fun at both sides.

In the movie’s dark future, society selects a single classroom at random for the titular conflict. The students are gassed and fitted with exploding collars, then set loose on an island with an array of weapons and three days to finish each other off. One survivor will be allowed to return home. If more than one person still lives at the end of the three days, then everyone’s collars explode. The collars also explode if caught in any randomly shifting grids on the island, forcing the combatants to move around rather than hole up and wait.

The class’s put-upon teacher (Beat Takeshi) explains it all to them with the help of a phalanx of armed guards, then serves as master of ceremonies while his former pupils hunt each other down. The film constantly shifts between combatants: focusing on four or five key individuals but breaking away to detail the grisly fate of all 40 participants. Our sympathies naturally fall on two good-hearted kids (Ntatsuya Fujiwara and Aki Maeda) who want no part in any killing and merely seek a way to survive. Those attitudes don’t translate well with their classmates. The more ruthless ones do much better, from an apparent queen bee (Kill Bill’s Chiaki Kuriyama) with a taste for double crosses to a psychotic “transfer student” (Sôsuke Takaoka) who actually volunteered to participate. A few hopefuls plot to strike back against the people who put them here, while the rest simply last as long as they can.

Director Kinji Fukasaku takes a Ten Little Indians approach in detailing every one of the kills. All the inferred slights and cruelties of teenage life come raging to the fore as, divested of their social niceties, former classmates devolve into vicious beasts. A few twists and turns keep the formula from becoming repetitive, and Fukasaku brings enough compassion to the deserving to keep the grizzly deaths from numbing our moral sensitivities. A sharp sense of humor assists him: aimed towards insight and ridicule rather than the nihilistic glee to which it might have succumbed. It chills us even as we snicker, and the resulting mayhem ultimately reads as a condemnation of our own violent tendencies rather than a tacit celebration.

The underlying messages combine with sharp filmmaking for a gloriously entertaining ride, provided you have a taste for dark material and don’t mind the occasional poke in the ribs. Battle Royale completely engages us without losing track of its anti-violence message, a tricky balance that has sent many lesser productions spinning into hypocrisy. Here, the two elements work in congruence: allowing us to enjoy the spectacle without skipping the cost of looking.

In light of that, the 3D release becomes an unnecessary distraction. Granted, the filmmakers have shown no compunction about milking the film for all its worth in the past, with a director’s cut that actually weakens the original and a sequel that won’t grace the annals of brilliant Part 2s anytime soon. 3D thus can’t do much harm, and the reconfiguring can’t remove the film’s marvelous manic energy. It’s simply an afterthought – another reason to rake in some extra cash – and the presumption involved rankles what should be an otherwise sublime experience. Battle Royale represents must-see viewing for any fan of cinema. Just try to ignore the producers reaching quietly for your wallet in the process.

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 8 of 8
1 
jedibanner 5/25/2012 5:28:30 AM

Interesting Rob...

I felt BR was way, wayyyyyyyyyy more serious then Hunger Game because of the reality of the class social ''tagging'' and ''clicks'' Vs the usual futuristic drama of a girl trying to sahe her sister...YAWN!

Maybe it's jsut me but I've always felt BR was more grounded to today's youth and how ''they would act''.

And obviously....in 3D? why in all that is holly would someone think to put this in 3D.

Stupid 3D....

Wyldstaar 5/25/2012 6:15:14 AM

 As with any limited release which I have even the slightest interest in, none of the theaters here are playing it.

ultrazilla2000 5/25/2012 8:42:23 AM

A "girl trying to save her sister"???  Why do I get the feeling you've never even seen The Hunger Games, Jedibanner?  The main character swapped places with her sister in the drawing early on in the story...but there's really no other sisterly saving going on.  Why don't you at least try something before you constantly hate on it.

MrJawbreakingEquilibrium 5/25/2012 10:21:21 AM

Even though this movie isn't really like Hunger Games or vice versa rather and they aren't really related Hunger Games bringing this movie out back into the limelight is a prime example of what remakes can do for a film so all of you people bitching about remakes can shut it. And that's one hell of a runon sentence. Shut it.

gauleyboy420 5/25/2012 10:52:06 AM

I LOVED teh hunger games trilogy, but was let down by the movie. It was good, but not great. That said I didn't see the "plaigarism" of BR. They share 1 element. The rest is very very different. AND I didn't think BR was all that great. It was a big bowl of OK.  Maybe the book is better, but the movie seemed like every other "The most Dangerous Game" movie (yes, even Hunger Games)

I don't think kids were supposed to be grounded to Hunger Games. And I certainly don't see how they would be more able to realte to BR either.

jedibanner 5/25/2012 12:03:11 PM

ultrazilla2000, I unfortunatly paid for the dunky pile of crap called the Hunger Game and my statement was more to describe the ''originality'' of the film. But yes, I wasn't precise enough to say that it is at the beginning, not the whole movie...fine...you got me there.

BR was way more original in my view then HG. BUt I can say that both have their own disctinction and seperate world (I see Br concentraning more on the actual people overall with 2 or 3 specific stories Vs HG concentrate on 2 or 3 characters and everyone else is just there for the killing).

Both realities are the same gauleboy420...it's kids killing kids....THAT is the main thing of both stories but my perspective on things is that BR did it more real...dwelved into the different people in the class way more then HG did.

That's why I get the sense BR was more ''grounded'' since the clicks and judgmental minds of kids from highschool was easier to portrait yet still done with a sense of ''this-used-to-be-me'' vibe...easier to relate and get attached to the deaths of certain characters.

I know many loved the books and movie GH...all the best...I didn't...and I keep blaming Mania for introducing me to BR...it's their fault when you really think about it....just sayin...

westend 5/25/2012 12:34:46 PM

 I found BR to be very over rated. Yes it's more graphic and violent, but it was too campy and dialogue was terrible.

hanso 5/26/2012 6:24:38 PM

 Me.Jaw, what u said makes no sense.  

1 

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

POPULAR TOPICS