CGI Maggie Gyllenhaal over Katie Holmes? That's like trading my pile of horse manure for your pile of buffalo chips.
I think Nolan has a thing for dogs.
WOOF, WOOF!

Horror depends more on craftsmanship than perhaps any other genre in existence. Put it together elegantly enough and it always works: the scares hit at the right points, the atmosphere seeps into the audience’s bones, and the chills remain long enough to prompt a few uneasy glances at the bedroom closet before turning out the lights. Even the hoariest genre cliché can still function if presented with some style, and humble little shockers have a way of becoming minor classics if they do things right.
I’m not prepared to call Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark a classic, at least not yet. But it surely knows how to do its job with creativity and panache: courtesy of fledgling director Troy Nixey and a fellow named del Toro lurking in the wings. The basics rank among the oldest and most shopworn of horror tropes: a spooky old house, a child in danger and a threat that remains more shadow than substance. But in the filmmakers’ hands, it becomes a delightfully spooky funhouse, more than up to the challenge of ushering the summer of 2011 to a close.
The story stems from an older made-for-TV movie about magical creatures that live in a cave beneath an old Gothic mansion. They come from the old school of fairies: the kind that feed on human teeth and periodically drag hapless humans down into their hellish domain. The house’s original owner was a renowned naturalist whose drawings took a turn for the Lovecraftian just before his untimely disappearance. His house sat abandoned for many years, but now renowned architect Alex Hurst (Guy Pearce) and his new girlfriend Kim (Katie Holmes) have come to refurbish it. Soon, the architect’s young daughter Sally (Bailee Madison) arrives… and those things in the basement think they’ve found a new target.
The film’s success begins with the family dynamic, and the way it merges seamlessly with the more overt horror elements. Hurst loves his daughter, but is too preoccupied with the house to pay her much mind. Sally, in turn, feels abandoned by both parents… making her very vulnerable to the sinister whispers coming up from the ducts. It’s Kim who has to act as a surrogate mother – awkwardly at first, but with increasing urgency as the movie goes on. All three actors give solid performances (Madison’s is particularly vital for the film to work), and the relationship between them holds the film strongly during the various quiet spots.
Not that there’s many of those. The boggies in the basement make their move fairly quickly, and with Papa convinced that it’s all in her head, Sally needs to make a stand on her own. This is familiar territory for Guillermo del Toro, who often focuses on children in peril. But it works well here, thanks to Nixey’s creepy atmosphere and the sound decision to keep the creatures hidden until later in the proceedings. Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark carries its share of gore, though it’s as artfully deployed as the remainder of the film: a sharp burst in the beginning, with the remainder focusing more on cringe-inducing body parts like tendons and eyeballs rather than buckets of blood. It lends the growing suspense a real kick, as well as accentuating the monsters’ nastiness and Sally’s desperate efforts to keep them at bay.
The film comes close to tripping at the end, when it appears to run out of gas right at the big showdown. But Nixey rebounds with a nicely unsettling epilogue that wraps the previous spooky thrills up in a neat little package. He never deviates from the target and never raises his sights beyond what is required to send a goose across our graves. He focuses his energy on making this the most effective engine it can be. In the process, he reminds us why all those old clichés worked so well and that there’s still life in them if people who love and respect the genre devote a little time to sprucing them up properly. Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark shows us what a little care and attention in the right places can do: a notable achievement in a month normally bereft of them.
CGI Maggie Gyllenhaal over Katie Holmes? That's like trading my pile of horse manure for your pile of buffalo chips.
I think Nolan has a thing for dogs.
WOOF, WOOF!
I don't think either woman is a dog. However, I do think that Nolan has the inability to cast strong actresses in his films. Even if the films themselves are successful.
I loved Del Torro's outings in horror and the supernatural. I'm definitely excited to see something that he has shown some passion. Plus, it isn't Final Destination 6, Saw 12, or a vampire/zombie movie. It is a good ol fashioned old scarey house flick. And, it sounds like a fun flick to see.
As wise pointed out in the other thread, with the storm hitting the entire east coast this weekend I don't expect much success for this movie.
And I wasn't talking looks though I'm not attracted to Mrs. Tom Cruise...I'm just talking acting ability. Maggie is a damn good actress, which you were not able to see a lot of in the small part for TDK, but the time she did have in TDK she was 100 times better than Katie in the first one.
I think Katie is really cute, or at least she used to be. Maggie never was much to look at, even when she flashed her ta-ta's in a movie I can't even remember the name of! LOL! I thought both women sucked in their respective parts from BB and TDK. Neither impressed me much at all, and Maggie was very much a non-factor in TDK.
Blake Lively isn't much of a actress either, but she is far far superior looking than either Katie or Maggie for sure! But to me, Rosamund Pike from Doom and Surrogates is a complete babe, with the best eyes and great body, AND she can act! DOOM was an ok film....I watched it again last weekend, but Ms. Pike was definitely the best of that group, and in Surrogates, she was really good along side Bruce.
Hobbs my old friend...while I don't really have many issues about Katie Holmes, but I do think her grating voice seems to be problematic and it hampers her acting chops. Its almost like puberty missed her and still sounds like she's 13 years old. Blake Lively...well I don't care how cute she is, she just doesn't cut it for me as an actress. Maybe in time she'll get better or maybe not.
Wait so if it scares Rob it won't scare the rest of us? Eh? A scary movie is a scary movie...a GROSS movie aka hostel isn't scary its just gross. His description of this movie is what I would expect a description of a good horror movie to be like...
zalder, what scares people is all a matter of opinion. I've seen plenty of movies that were supposed to be scary but the only thing they were good at was putting me to sleep..ala paranormal just as an example. My point about my statement is that Rob is wrong most of the time and doesn't review movies, for the most part, without a bias opinion. Thus anything that scares him I'm sure I'll be yawning through.
What's happening RaithManan? Good to see you still pop up on mania every once in a while.
Eagle, Maggie suffered in TDK from taking over a role and that didn't have much meat to it. I would recommend the secratery, stranger than fiction, off the top of my head to see how good she is...but as always it's a matter of opinion. I'm not saying I want to wed her, just think she is talented.
Hobbs, I agree with you on a lot of topics, but I can't be a Rob hatter. I agree with his reviews a majority of the time. He is 100 times more reliable than anyone over on AICN and his reviews usually fall pretty much in line with the critics over at Rotten Tomatoes. I don't really see a bias in his reviews. Reviews are all just opinions after all.
Does anyone besides me think Katie Holmes is one of the worst actresses next to Blake Livley? Granted Blake is much nicer to look at.
I keep hoping Nolan goes to George Lucas and ask him to CGI Maggie Gyllenhaal over Katie Holmes in Batman Begins.
As for this movie, if Rob was scared then I know the rest of us won't be. I'll take a pass.