It was good, but there is the distinct lack of urgency that LOTR had. That said I enjoyed it. I'm not sold on the 48fps 3D, though. It may have been sleepiness creeping in on me at 3am when the movie was over but the 48fps and 3D was making my eyes hurt on the way home. It worked well in spots, but a lot of the time it oddly sped up the motion in the film, which is odd since most of the time when raise the frame rate, it slows the action down. I'll have to see it possibly in 2D 48fps or at least in another theater to make sure it wasn't just something off in the projection at my theater. It just had the very sort of quicktime type buffering going on in spots.
I'll be checking it out in Imax on Saturday. I think it's regular 24fps 3D, though the projectionist at the theater told me months ago they'd had it in 48fps 3D Imax, but according to the Imax site, it's regular 24fps 3D.








I loved The Hobbit, give it five stars and the critics can kiss my azz. Slow and boring? Subtlety must be too much for a lot of people to handle. People like that need to watch more Micheal Bay movies. Nuff said.