Mania Review: Maleficent - Mania.com



Mania Review

Mania Grade: C

10 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

  • Starring: Angelina Jolie, Elle Fanning, Sharlto Copley, Sam Riley, Imelda Staunton, Lesley Manville and Juno Temple
  • Written by: Linda Woolverton
  • Directed by: Robert Stromberg
  • Studio: Walt Disney Pictures
  • Rating: PG
  • Run Time: 97 minutes
  • Series:

Mania Review: Maleficent

We became the best at being bad...

By Rob Vaux     May 30, 2014
Source: Mania.com


Maleficent
© Walt Disney Pictures/Robert Trate

 With movies so eager to recycle previous content these days, it’s not much of a surprise that Disney picked one of its most popular animated characters for a live-action reboot. Of course, “live action” is a matter of opinion, since this new version of Sleeping Beauty consists largely of CGI landscapes and computer-based special effects. That carries its share of charms, to be sure, and the prospect of revisiting the story from the villain’s point of view is intriguing (especially considering the villain). At the same time, such an effort needs more on the table that just a lot of fodder for the art book. And in that all-important aspect, Maleficent can’t measure up.

At least you can’t fault Angelina Jolie, who rocks the doors off this thing (quite literally in some cases). Her reimagined Maleficent starts out as the protector of a beautiful faerie kingdom, only to lose her wings to a treacherous human lover (Sharlto Copley) and see said lover rise to the throne of the human kingdom next door. That’s certainly apt to piss a girl off, which is why she turns to the dark side and curses the king’s newborn daughter Aurora (Elle Fanning) to fall into a sleep-like death on her sixteenth birthday. (As you may suspect, a spinning wheel is involved.)

That much is pro forma. The more interesting aspects of the story involve her gradually getting to know Aurora, finding she likes the girl more than she suspected and… well, to say more would be telling.  Jolie hits every note perfectly, from the rage at her incalculable loss to the sinister glee she takes in revenge. As one-woman shows go, you could do a lot worse, and after years of middling performances, it’s great to see this reminder of why we dug her so much in the first place.

The script, unfortunately, can’t keep up with her. Her shifts in character come suddenly and capriciously, without any attendant reflection in the world around her. The fairy kingdom, for example, doesn’t need a queen… until she suddenly becomes evil and claims the throne… except that the faeries stay largely good, and don’t seem to have a problem with her… except the three fairies (Imelda Staunton, Juno Temple and Lesley Manville) who try to raise her away from Maleficent’s eye… except that…

You get the picture. Important developments take place without an underlying motivation, and we’re asked to accept seismic upheavals in the story without more of an effort to connect the dots. It feels worst at the finale – one of the most arbitrary we’ve seen in years – but dogs the rest of the film from the earliest scenes. The lumpy structure leads to awkward plot holes that pull us away from the central story, and leave only empty visual effects in their wake. Jolie can’t do it all on her own. Nor can her supporting cast, who prove ready to rock and roll at a moment’s notice (particularly Sam Riley, playing Maleficent’s shape-shifting crow Diaval). When they can do their thing, Maleficent becomes all that we hoped for. That doesn’t happen nearly often enough though, and considering the film’s truncated running time, you get the sense that far too much was left on the cutting room floor.

Furthermore, its relationship with its predecessor remains seriously problematic. I have issues with the original Disney Sleeping Beauty: its gorgeous design and the beautiful wickedness of Maleficent herself struggle against an awkward structure and a central couple placed on the sidelines. Maleficent moves heaven and earth to correct those errors, only to exhibit the same strengths and fall into the same traps. It looks terrific and its central concept could have been marvelous with a tighter structure and a few more script revisions. Young children won’t complain, and if you’re looking for a way to introduce, say, an eight-year-old to the delicious joys of rooting for the bad guy, this may be the vehicle to do it. But Disney leans too much on the Screensaver model of filmmaking to entice its audience, and the plot is far too shaky to avoid all those pesky questions grown-ups ask that have no satisfying answer.  It’s a lot of effort for very little payoff, something its sinister protagonist is far too awesome to allow.

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 10
1 
fatpantz 5/30/2014 1:33:43 AM

I can only laugh at last week's comment about Vaux reviewing movies in favor of getting to interview the cast.  Haha! This is your proof son.

Muenster 5/30/2014 6:50:53 AM

to his credit, this review seems to have more issues with direction and script, than it does with the performers, but then again this has been the problem with more live action films from Disney since the beginning.

monkeyfoot 5/30/2014 10:22:11 AM

I'm undecided about whether I want to see this at a theater or not.

 

 

 

I'm not undecided about how I hate the way Mania goes in and out all the time.

I CAN'T STAND IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm going to finish typing this comment and I estimate I have less than a 30% chance  it will actually get up and posted. I will probably get a big no access warning and then the webpages will fall into scattered pieces.

Here goes....

invisioner 5/30/2014 4:01:52 PM

 actually, this review is pretty much mirroring much of the reviews I have seen elsewhere. 

 

Jolie: rocks the bejeezus out of it.

the story: bad form and execution.

 

Ill still see it.

ElBaz13 5/30/2014 8:11:24 PM

Just came back to see it with the kids. 100% agree with the review. Jolie is awesome. Visuals are awesome but it was just meh.

Very short at 1 hour 37 minutes and there was something missing for sure. it lacked umph,

wilfredo15 5/31/2014 8:00:28 AM

 Kiero q me regalen entradas para ir a ver la peli de malefica se ve q esat piola kiero irrrrrrrrrr grrrrrrrrrrrr :(

 

 

hanso 5/31/2014 8:32:37 AM

Agree with ya Baz.  I thought it was ok, was hoping it would've been better tho.  Also, I wanted  more evil Maleficent, she wasn't really that bad.  For half the movie she's basically a prankster.  Still, the movie is worth it to see Jolie as Maleficent.  There were some cool shots of her that I liked, like when they show her shadow only before she pops out decked out in her evil clothes.

ElBaz13 6/1/2014 8:30:39 AM

The problem is, we got to see wicked Maleficent in the trailers and softie Malifecent in the movies. I  wanted more wicked.

My spanish is a bit rusty but I think Wilfredo15 is offering you tickets Hanso.

hanso 6/1/2014 10:02:38 AM

I think he's talking about Arnold.

ElBaz13 6/1/2014 6:28:33 PM

Lol!

1 

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

POPULAR TOPICS