Mania Review: Neighbors - Mania.com



Mania Grade: B+

20 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

  • Starring: Seth Rogen, Rose Byrne, Zac Efron, Christopher Mintz-Plasse, Craig Roberts and Jerrod Carmichael
  • Written by: Andrew J. Cohen and Brendan O'Brien
  • Directed by: Nicholas Stoller
  • Studio: Universal Pictures
  • Rating: R
  • Run Time: 96 minutes
  • Series:

Mania Review: Neighbors

Something about good fences...

By Rob Vaux     May 09, 2014

 The frathouse comedy is, to say the least, a well-worn genre. Animal House set the standard and to date it still hasn't been topped. Most entries in the canon seem content with updating the antics of John Belushi & Co to varying degrees of success, then fading back into the woodwork once their assigned task is done. Neighbors is notable not only because it's very funny, but because it finds a real way to shake up the equation without essentially departing from it. 

Since you've doubtless been inundated with promotional material, you're likely aware of the high-concept premise. A happy couple with a new baby (Seth Rogen and Rose Byrne) are surprised to learn that a local fraternity has moved in next door. Led by Zac Efron's self-important weasel, the brothers intend to party their way to complete moral oblivion: a sea change from the area's previous quiet reputation.

That's pretty standard for these kinds of movies, with the older squares fuming impotently at the young screw-ups whose "totally outrageous" behavior destroys the status quo. But Neighbors isn't interested in following that playbook. In the first case, it treats the fraternity members as obsequious little twerps rather than anyone worthy of admiration. Their antics are funny to be sure, but they ultimately come across as arrogant and deluded more than rebellious or iconoclastic. 

And that's where he real bit of genius comes in, because Rogen and Byrne's characters apparently don't see it that way. They used to be those party animals, you see, and while ostensibly happy in their quiet little suburban life, part of them desperately longs to jump back into the mosh pit. They initially approach their new neighbors in the spirit of peace, joining the first night's party before quietly asking them to keep the music down. When that doesn't work, they plot various means of shutting the brothers down, but every time they do, their green-eyed envy keeps getting in the way.

The concept slides the film around some serious plausibility issues (like why Rogen doesn't just call the police from the get-go), but it also provides a potent inter-generational bite. Just as the grown-ups gaze covetously at the carefree rumpus across the fence, so do the cannier members of the fraternity look at their nemeses and wonder if they themselves will be any different in ten years. It gives the various R-rated jokes a fair bit of thoughtfulness of the kind rarely seen in these kinds of movies. 

Neighbors also scores points for putting Byrne in the center of the action. When it comes to comedy of this ilk, women usually either serve as tsk-tsking mother types or flat-out sex objects. Here, the Australian actress gets to be just as foolish and short-sighted as Rogen, and reels in some very big laughs as a result. Hopefully, it will further erode the notion that women aren't funny, and maybe give performers like Byrne more chances to flash their comedic chops.

A few problems do crop up as well, mostly in the suspicious absence of things we associate with the real world (like lawsuits and the existence of other nearby residents who might not be thrilled by the loud parties either). Of course, if they did, there wouldn't be a movie, and the film makes a few hasty attempts to excuse them -- giving Lisa Kudrow a chance to shine as a dippy university dean -- but it still has to skate past some very uncomfortable questions. The gags also include some ill-conceived bits involving a stolen airbag that work brilliantly as physical comedy, but leave a very bad taste in the mouth once you consider all the implications. (This material needs to limit itself to pranks and mischief. Moving into actual criminal behavior and possible child endangerment? That kind of kills the buzz.)

Such issues aren't entirely surprising, and thankfully don't limit the rapid-fire gags that still serve as the ultimate purpose of the exercise. Neighbors knows the difference between clever and merely tasteless, and brings some solid notions to bear that lend the humor some surprising weight. It can't touch Animal House, of course, but it has enough self respect to do its own thing with the same basic idea, instead of just filling in the blanks. That's enough to make it the comedy to beat this summer, an R-rated gigglefest with the rare distinction of some smarts behind its raunchiness. The more we see of its ilk, the better. 

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 20
1 2 >  >>  
monkeyfoot 5/9/2014 7:48:57 AM

This movie looks as funny as hell (that's an odd expression). I'm not sure if I'll see it in the theater but I'm sure I'll see it at some point.

slayerfaith 5/9/2014 8:11:15 AM

Bad movie

slayerfaith 5/9/2014 8:15:05 AM

This film was garbage do not waste your money. It was a major waste of $20 and a morning. I thought it was going to be similar to "This is The End" it was nothing close to that. Christopher Mintz-Plasse has about 15 minutes of dialogue in the entire film. Save your dough and wait for this on on DVD/Blue-ray. The only reason they are giving this a B rating is because they were given the opportunity to interview the cast. Some laughs but nothing at all on the scale of 21 Jump Street.   

VTGamehendge 5/9/2014 8:28:05 AM

I'll be going to see it at some point.  Spoder-Man is taking top priority right now though.  I'm either catching that later this afternoon or Sunday night.

I heard Seth Rogan's interview on Howard Stern the other day and it was funny as shit.  Great interview.  But it is Howard Stern.  Pretty much every interview is good.

aegrant 5/9/2014 9:32:09 AM

 netflix/redbox for me.

MrJawbreakingEquilibrium 5/9/2014 9:53:16 AM

 Slayer, that's the stupidest thing I've read all day so far.

ddiaz28 5/9/2014 2:17:53 PM

Completely agree. Did that make any sense to anyone? Where does it cost 20 bucks to go to a movie that isn't in IMAX? You thought it was going to be an apocolyptic comedy? What does the amount of dialogue that Christopher Mintz Plasse has have to do with how good the film is? And I'd be paying more money to buy a Blu Ray of the film than seeing it in the theater. And I didn't realize 21 Jump Street was the stick with we measure comedic success with. I hope that post was purposefully non-sensical. Made me shake my head an laugh either way.

mlaforce 5/9/2014 2:36:52 PM

Who in the hell would go and spend $20 at a matinee showing and then come out confused thinking he was going in to watch "This is the End" and "21 Jump Street"? Oh ya I know who some dumb As* named SLAYERFAITH....If you were joking around and I don't think you were, I digress and will now pull my D*ck out of your Arsse...Have a good day now and may the Force Be with You...

blankczech 5/9/2014 5:15:27 PM

 Hey...Slayer's entitled to his opinion.  

I'm sure he doesn't need me to defend his remarks, but why should we automatically assume he's lying when he said he paid $20.  He didn't say he went to see it alone or that he didn't get something to eat while he was there.

Also ddiaz28 he didn't say buy the DVD or Blu-Ray.  He said wait for this on DVD / Blu-Ray.  I assume he's talking about a Redbox rental.

As for some of the other posts aimed at Slayer's comments.  I like a good argument / debate as well as anyone but before you keyboard tough guys / bullies hiding behind your phoney names gang up on another commenter maybe you should do what he did, first...SEE THE MOVIE.  Then you'll be better equipped to decide whether your opinion coincides with his or not.

 

 

 

Noovtere 5/9/2014 6:36:06 PM

Maybe the reviews set me up to think this would be better than it was, but I was generally disappointed.  There were some funny bits, but it wasn't consistently funny, and certainly isn't Rogen's best work.

1 2 >  >>  

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

POPULAR TOPICS