Mania Review: Tower Heist - Mania.com



Mania Grade: B

20 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

  • Starring: Ben Stiller, Eddie Murphy, Casey Affleck, Alan Alda, Matthew Broderick, Tea Leoni, Michael Pena, and Gabourey Sidibe
  • Written by: Ted Griffin and Jeff Nathanson
  • Directed by: Brett Ratner
  • Studio: Universal Pictures
  • Rating: PG-13
  • Run Time: 99 minutes
  • Series:

Mania Review: Tower Heist

There's a tower. And a heist. Any questions?

By Rob Vaux     November 04, 2011


Tower Heist
© Universal Pictures/Robert Trate

 Calling Tower Heist the best movie Brett Ratner ever made isn’t saying much. The inexplicably popular Rush Hour series remains a blight on Jackie Chan’s career, and while I don’t flat-out hate X3, no one mistakes it for a high point of the franchise. He’s slick, vacuous and utterly without vision. He directs studio piffle with no eye on anything but box office, and while he knows how to sell tickets, he doesn’t have the first clue how to get anyone to remember his movies five minutes after they’ve seen them.

Within that framework, however, Tower Heist does surprisingly well. The very things that make it so corporate also work in its favor: clever dialogue, star power, a fun caper, and a smooth package that makes them all work together. Perhaps most importantly, it lets Ben Stiller and Eddie Murphy – two very funny men in the right circumstances  -- play off of each other for the first time ever. The pairing proves inspired, and the large supporting cast (including Casey Affleck, Tea Leoni, and Gabourey Sidibe) contributes some significant chemistry as well. They run through a story as gimmicky as they come, but one which turns out solid entertainment almost by force of will alone.

Stiller plays Josh Kovacs, manager of a luxury high rise in New York City who runs the pampering of its wealthy occupants like a Swiss watch. Trouble rises when the penthouse resident (Alan Alda) is arrested for financial malfeasance that includes making the staff’s pension plans vanish in a puff of smoke. Kovacs intends to get even by robbing the man blind, with a little help from a local hood (Murphy) and a gaggle of insiders working in the tower.

Ratner borrows liberally from his betters at every turn: Murphy’s moment in a jail cell echoes 48 HRS and a subsequent conversation in an automobile takes us on a trip to French Connection country, to cite just a pair of examples. But he never cuts too close to the bone and the resulting mixture feels suitably original to pass an easy inspection. More importantly, he gives the cast room to roam: a move that both endears us to them and lets the script’s more clever aspects come to the fore.

The women in the cast take the best advantage of it. Leoni’s straight-laced FBI Agent could have been relegated to straight-man duties, but she finds a nice banter with Stiller that lets their on-again off-again partnership shine. Sibide, for her part, is a mild revelation. Her polite, capable maid steals nearly every scene she’s in and she more than holds her own against the proven stars in the cast. The actress is clearly not satisfied with just being that girl from Precious, and she has the screen presence to make a long and fruitful career if she so wishes.

In the end, though, it falls to Murphy and Stiller to carry the load. The latter clearly relishes the opportunity to play someone tough and capable rather than the well-meaning dipshits on which he made his name. As for the former, this is the first reminder we’ve seen of his real star power since Bowfinger. Indeed, it raises shades of the 1980s Murphy, who ruled the box office with an iron fist and made us all believe in his comedic genius. Their interplay works wonders with the material and keeps us impulsively watching even during the film’s dodgier parts.

It’s a good thing too, because the story often coasts on fuzzy logic rather than ratcheting its details tight. We never feel the thrill of a well-executed plan or understand how the various plot elements are supposed to come together. Ratner organizes the various plot twists appreciably well, and juggles the major players with admirable dexterity, but the logic underlying his set pieces only gets flimsier as the film goes on.  Tower Heist seems to instinctively understand that, however, and wisely focuses its efforts on the strongest cards in its deck. It stays away from obvious political messages concerning rich crooks and the working Joes they’ve fucked, content to make the point and then get on with the job of entertaining us without unduly showy statements. It never overreaches, and doesn’t dilute its good time by travelling too far from its comfort zone. It even attains a strange sort of retro charm: if you squint at it right, it might have been made 25 years ago very easily. That’s a mild gift to be sure, but an undeniably enjoyable one… something we Ratner detractors never could have predicted.

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 20
1 2 >  >>  
karas1 11/4/2011 4:27:10 AM

I'll gloss over the point that this film is a heist comedy and doesn't even approach the genre this site is supposed to be covering unless it contains plot elements which aren't obvious from the commercials.  If so they aren't mentioned in the review.

I've been sort of looking forward to this film.  Murphy can make some of the funniest movies ever, and also some of the unfunniest bombs in cinematic history.  I'm pleased to see that this might be one of the good ones. 

It appears to be a Thanksgiving film, a holiday which doesn't get too much attention in the cinema.

goldeneyez 11/4/2011 5:39:10 AM

So, what's really interesting to me about this movie isn't the movie itself, but that change that it may bring in.  I read somewhere a few weeks ago that the studio that is distributing this movie is going to release it to On Demand services a couple of weeks after it's theatrical release in certain markets.  The idea is to test releasing movies strait to the consumers bypassing theaters all together.  It could potentially change a lot about movies in America if it works.

Personally for a comedy, I wouldn't mind forgoing the theater experience (over priced snacks, extra expensive ticket prices, obnoxious people, etc.) and view something like this in the comfort of my home.  For big special effects ladden movies, I'd prefer the theater experience.  Anyway...

OK, I just did a news search to mention a link, and it looks like Universal nixed the idea because Theaters threatened to boycott the movie.  If you are interested you can just google "Tower Heist On Demand."  I would have liked to have seen how it worked out... ah well.

hanso 11/4/2011 6:51:54 AM

 So what if Tower Heist got reviewed here?  It's not like they didn't cover a genre flick opening this weekend and gave the slot to Tower Heist and the Harold and Kumar flick.  I'd rather have these reviews than no reviews.

Goldeneyez, wasn't that on Demand thing suppose to be like $60 for the movie?  If that was the price that's still a no go for people without families.  Unless you could be able to record the movie on your DVR while you were watching it, then I could see the price justification.

Wiseguy 11/4/2011 7:13:22 AM

Yeah what hanso said. I believe that premium ppv is around 60 bucks. Maybe if you invite a bunch of friends and have them pay you a cover charge :) but I don't see this working out too well and it's pissing off theater owners since 3 or 4 weeks down the line is usually when theaters get to keep a higher percentage of the ticket price

I'm happy to see this film getting a little bit of positive feedback. I may check it out next weekend, too much work this weekend. I thought the trailers looked hilarious, Murphy looked a bit back to form and I've always liked Stiller's comedies.

millean 11/4/2011 8:08:39 AM

$60 for a pay per view movie?  Who in the hell would pay that?!

From the trailers I've seen, I have thought this looks like a pretty decent movie.  Notihng I read above makes me feel any different, so I hope I get a chance to check it out.

jedibanner 11/4/2011 9:22:37 AM

Ok...the new girly Matt Damon movie is coming out also...should we review these movies too?

If we are going outside of the realm of Sci-Fy, what not review anything not related to what this website is all about?

If that's where this site is going, I'm out. This movie is a comedy, has nothing to do with fantasy or the genre showned so why bother?

I'd rather no reviews and only reviews of what is pertinant to why we came here for instead of general movies like this one.

 

hanso 11/4/2011 9:45:47 AM

 There are no major releases this weekend that are genre.  What's the problem with releasing a review when there is nothing else?  Tower Heist is a major release, with a decent cast and a "genre" director.  It's not like it's a review for obscure foreign drama movie of the week.

If next week Immortals comes out and they don't cover that but instead review Adam Sandler's Jack & Jill then I could see the outrage.  What did Vaux not cover this week that you wanted him to review?

karas1 11/4/2011 10:14:36 AM

goldeneyez, you did see how it worked out.  It got nixed.

Higgy 11/4/2011 10:59:14 AM

I liked Rush Hour.   :(

isgrimner 11/4/2011 11:44:35 AM

I'm not against Tower Heist being reviewed here as I have a pretty wide range of interests. 

 I do find it somewhat peculiar that they'll review this and mention some of the other non-genre properties (ie. Big Bang Theory) here yet disregard many that are clearly genre and have been requested by regulars.

1 2 >  >>  

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

POPULAR TOPICS