The Manic Maniac: R.I.P. Watchmen? - Mania.com



The Manic Maniac

23 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

The Manic Maniac: R.I.P. Watchmen?

Watchmen's reality is killing the fantasy.

By Joe Crosby     August 07, 2008


Dr. Manhattan is electrifying in WATCHMEN(2008).
© Warner Bros.
Not arguably, one of the two most buzz-worthy events coming out of Comic-Con this year was the footage of Watchmen (the other being the latest Terminator installment). At this point, we've all seen at least one Watchmen trailer, and it's hard not to get excited. In addition to the trailer, the kindly marketing gurus behind the Alan Moore adaptation have been uploading "production journals" to a dedicated web location at Yahoo! Movies, where fans can view three-minute making-of videos depicting a man afire, the construction of the ship Archimedes, among others, and soon to be more. Since May, new clips have arrived somewhat sporadically. But as of August 6—possibly due to the response from Comic-Con—the studio will be releasing production journals every sixth of every month until the film opens March 6, 2009.
 
It's a basic marketing campaign, but it's a fairly smart one. Reacting to a snowball-roll of anticipation over two years, they're offering instant gratification to an audience who needs it. In doing so, they are killing the magic of the movie.
 
The audience they're kneeling before, arms extended, is us, all of us—not just Watchmen fans, but every person who wakes in the morning and drifts off to sleep at night, knowing their coffee timer is set. We've been somewhat recklessly cultivating our instantly gratified society for years. Fast food comes to mind, certainly. But in the world of art, it's a more frightening concept. Film, books, comic books—these are many things, but they are all one thing: escape. They unleash worlds upon us where up is down, right is wrong, black is white and pigs fly. Fanciful dreams become fantastical reality. And part of the escapism comes from the anticipation, the imagination, the surprise and the interpretation, almost in that order. It's as much you—the escaper, the dreamer—constructing the world in your mind as it is the artist creating it for you. That's part of what's so jarring about Watchmen production journals. We know what a cheeseburger tastes like, but we don't know where out minds can take us. They're stealing some of the imagination, the surprise. They're doing most of the creation for us through exposition.
 
This has been done for years. Most obviously, it has come in the form movie trailers. Later, if you were lucky enough to have cable television, you might have seen a 15-minute "production journal" segment for an upcoming release in between Friday night HBO matinees. And now, online, we scamper to collect as much official and unofficial film footage as our RAM will allow. We can barely sit still without being, well, gratified. And long before a film is ever released. Watchmen production journals are doing this for us. They're strategically and incrementally offering us film footage, not just trailers, but actual explanations of how they made their story. They're showing us how this fantasy is becoming a reality, rather than letting us blindly immerse ourselves in it, live it. We didn't ask them to, and we didn't have to. Our nature demands it. We think we're being rewarded, when we're actually being deprived.
 
A friend recently brought up a college discussion about Dante's Inferno, and why the concept of Satan was so unsettling and intense. As the reader descended deeper through the rings of hell, he took in brief pieces about Satan, hints and stories, but there was nothing direct. As a result, the imagination ran unfettered, wondering what he would look like or say or do, and that's when he was the most frightening. That's what made him exciting. Anything Dante might have tried to expose hitherto could never compare with the reader's anticipation and imagination. Letting us think was the genius of Dante.
 
Because of the business of art and movies and our sensory-hungry condition, few artists get away with this anymore. J.J. Abrams does, which is, in part, what makes his Lost so mystifying. Cloverfield, with its airtight production policy, reaped similar rewards. Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight, in reality, had very little straightforward marketing, instead word-of-mouth phenomena spun hypotheticals and legends of Heath Ledger's Joker. George Lucas has been traditionally tight-lipped, but you could argue he's a generation gone now. There are precious few others. And certainly not Watchmen director Zack Snyder. Even if he wanted to, he couldn't. The studio wouldn't allow it. We would barely allow it.
 
It's part of the reason Watchmen scribe Alan Moore despises the concept of the adaptation. When Entertainment Weekly asked if he ever wondered what Snyder was doing with the film, he said, "I would rather not know." And not for imagination's sake. He hates the business of it that removes the art. So much so, that when Terry Gilliam attempted an adaptation 20 years ago, he asked Moore how he, if given the chance, would transform the graphic novel into a film. "If anyone asked me, I would have said, 'I wouldn't,'" Moore replied. Gilliam abandoned the project.
 
To be sure, the Watchmen Yahoo! page is little more than a business partnership thinly veiled as "something for the fans," in a form that just so happens to be palatable to our whims. And it will probably be successful, which means other films will follow.
 
Because of this, Watchmen’s alternate reality suddenly won’t be so alternate. We won’t be able to measure the impact this time, but the otherwise exact same film won’t be as good as it could have been. Because of marketing. Because of us.
 
Production journals, director's commentary, alternate cuts—the exposition, the transparency that is slowly killing the escape—it will all ultimately wear thin, but not before it has chipped away at our imaginations until there's nothing to escape from because there's no longer something to escape to. Ars gatia artis … art for art's sake scarcely exists anymore. And one day, the art will no longer be the form. The real art will be the anticipation, when some rogue creator abandons publicity and marketing and business, and let's our minds construct new horizons in experiences far removed from our own.
 
Combo number 2, please.

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 23
1 2 3 >  >>  
Frackinjackson 8/7/2008 3:28:54 AM
I'm not so sure. I purposefully avoided all Dark Knight trailers, virals etc just so I could see it with fresh eyes. I did it last year with Transformers and, as with DK, it made my watching of the movie WAY more exciting and enjoyable. But I did this out of choice. I would guess that most of (for example) The Dark Knights $400million (so far) cannot come entirely from Bat Fans or even people who scavenge the net for sites like this looking for any new pic or piece of footage. I would imagine most of that B.O take came from average joe movie goers who saw the poster, read a good review, saw a trailer or heard great word of mouth. And I say this goes for any big success at the box office. Most people don't spend their time on Mania or Aintitcool or wherever. Genre fans hungry for movie news do. So in a way the magic is only lost on the kind of people who choose to spoil it for themselves. They were probably the same kids who spied through their parents closet looking for Christmas presents weeks before the 25th and wondered why Christmas day was a let down. For me, I'd much rather wait till the day and rip open my present. It's much more fun.
karas1 8/7/2008 3:56:03 AM
For some people they are not spoilers. They are apetizers. While I don't want to know how a movie is going to end or important plot points before hand, watching segments on how a certain special effect was done or reading an interview with an actor is a great way to whet my apetite and make my anticipation keener. It enhanses the enjoyment for me. And when I'm watching the movie I'm in the moment. I'm not thinking about how the effects were done or something I read about the movie in a magazine article. I'm watching the movie. Besides, net content is something you have to search out. Anybody who doesn't want to see it doesn't have to. I read Watchmen back when it first came out in the eighties and have reread it several times since so I know ho the movie's going to end. That's not going to stop me from seeing it, just to see how the adaptation goes.
TayDor 8/7/2008 4:06:04 AM
I agree with Karas1. I like to see how the "magic" is accomplished. It does not at all take away from my enjoyment of the movie. I don't want to know plot details, but I love interviews with the actors that describe their take on the characters, etc. I just like the whole process that goes into making a movie. I get more out of the movie. Take Fellowship of the Rings. There's a scene in the beginning where Gandalf appears to seamlessly hand his staff and hat to Bilbo while kepping the sizes of the characters intact. It was awe inspiring when I first saw it and I wondered how they pulled it off. Later when I found out how it was done, I still marvel at the wonder of that scene. I don't know, maybe there's a skill to watching movies. I'm able to forget everything and invest myself into the world of the movie and enjoy the movie for what it is (unless it's really really bad).
ponyboy76 8/7/2008 5:14:28 AM
I third that sentiment. None of the viral stuff or interviews and snippets of the movies I have seen dissuaded me from wanting to see the movie. It ruined nothing. it definitely whet my appetite for the flick. I also love how movies are made and am interested to see how certain things are pulled off. It never takes any magic away from the movie. I know its not reality, so they have to accomplish certain things somehow. Gone are the days when I was a kid and we just chalked it up to "movie magic"
AMiSHPiRATE 8/7/2008 6:42:55 AM
As a guy that does this stuff for a living, I've gotta say you're way of, Mr. Crosby. I know how they do most of these effects. I understand all the special effects, lighting, makeup, sound, and craft services guys are all about two feet out of frame, and why the heck does it matter? It's about suspension of disbelief and being engrossed in the film. If a film doesn't capture you're attention and your mind wanders somewhere else (anywhere else), then that's the films fault for sucking. We've already read the watchmen, so regardless of what information is put out there on its creation we already know how it'll end. Heck, we can usually accurately guess the ending of any movie we watch if we just put some thought into it, but that doesn't ruin the movie. Ask yourself this, Mr. Crosby: Is a film a piece of art that stands alone, or is it an event whose value is predicated by your perspective at the time of your viewing? If you have explosive diarrhea when you go see dark knight, then of course the experience will be ruined, but does that devalue the movie? If you choose to watch the making of video before you go see dark knight, does that devalue the movie?
Wiseguy 8/7/2008 7:34:14 AM
I have to agree with the fellas here. I don't care what you show me, how it's made, funny lines, whatever, if I'm interested in the film it won't change that and if I'm not interested it may change my mind. Spoilers never bothered me, you can tell me the ending and the secret twist, I'll still go see the movie. Bottom line is nothing can spoil the movie going experience for me. And for those that don't like to be spoiled it's pretty easy to stay away from such sites. hanso is one that always complains about any little spoiler yet he's always hunting down information. Obviously people want this and resistance is futile.
joeybaloney 8/7/2008 8:07:46 AM
I'm with Frackinjackson on this. I generally avoid all the podcasts, video blog updates and all other happy crappy except for trailers involved with my favorite anticipated movies and tv. All that other stuff is interesting and I'll check it all out on the DVD but I'd rather go into the film, even one like Watchmen where I've read the source material several times, knowing as little as possible behind the scenes. Personally I don't understand the appeal of that stuff ahead of time but if that's your thing then that's cool. It's not mine so I avoid it. Done and done. I certainly don't think those things are hurting the industry, especially for product like TDK & Watchmen. I think you are dead on with regards to our continuous development into an instant gratification society helping to proliferate this type of hyping of films and tv, but I think that’s a symptom and not a cause. If anything I think this helps the business end of filmmaking in the long run. The bigger question is: is this continuous trend in instant gratification good for societies in general? I would argue not in the long run. It makes people lazy and accepting of inferior product in a lot of areas. In the area of food, for instance, it makes for an extremely unhealthy diet in most cases. In other areas it keeps people from thinking critically and keeps them concentrating on where their next distraction can come from. Where can they be fed their next opinion. But in the case of films I think it only helps the business. Does that make any sense?
Wiseguy 8/7/2008 8:37:25 AM
Yes
joeybaloney 8/7/2008 8:45:48 AM
Thank God
karas1 8/7/2008 8:56:32 AM
Of course it makes sense. These things advertise the film. If seeing/reading them arouses the curiosity of someone who wasn't planning on seeing the film and that person ends up buying a ticket then they have positively affected the movie industry.
1 2 3 >  >>  

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

POPULAR TOPICS