Maniac Login

Forgot?



Member Review

Cloverfield

Mania Review: CLOVERFIELD
By: themovielord
Date: Sunday, January 20, 2008
Wishing Rob (Michael Stahl-David) a fond farewell several friends say goodbye via a video camera. Suddenly an explosion goes off and their whole New York City apartment shakes. Running up to the roof with the camera, the party goers see an explosion and that there is something big moving in the city. Before they know it the Statue of Liberty’s head comes rolling down the street.

The whole film is played out via the footage from that same video camera. This “found footage” is dubbed “Cloverfield”. So we, the audience, sit and watch as these people fight for survival while New York City is being demolished by a giant creature.

Yes, it is all shot using a hand held camera. If this perspective isn’t for you or if the ‘Blair Witch Project’ made you ill, then this film is not for you. With reality TV preparing most of Americans for shaking camera work and shows like “The Office” and “Battlestar Galactica” using a similar technique, most people should be able to stomach at least one sitting (to say nothing of people who play 3rd person shooter video games, this whole movie is in 3rd person).

‘Cloverfield’ opens with video footage of young lovers Rob and Beth (Odette Yustman) having just spent the night together. It will cut in out of this footage at times because the events that transpire in the film are tapped over their romantic day (pay attention to all of it, it is important). After an introduction to the characters and their various relationships, problems and some great humor… BOOM. The movie begins. Immediately when the city is in peril you have to wonder about the mentality of New Yorkers who go up to the roof to watch an explosion or take cell phone pics of a severed Statue of Liberty head. They (New Yorkers) have seen their city fall before. One would think that would clear out like cockroaches when the lights come on. Now I know the reality of it (as if it was real and this was me) but since this is a movie and if they take off we’d have no movie I surrendered myself to the film.

There is a great reality to the film (despite the creature walking around). Family and friends sticking together is played out beautifully. They face the problem of knowing what is the smart thing to do and what is the right thing to do. So when Rob receives that call for help, after he is so close to safety, we know that it isn’t the smart thing to do (go back into the city) it’s the right thing to do. Rob’s dilemma as well as his friends becomes our own. The small story of rescuing a friend is played out instead of the President or a General (who’s estranged wife just happens to be in New York) working out how to save his city. Again the film’s strengths come from its realism.

The film is one gigantic roller coaster ride. If the sound is up and the audience is in to it then the movie feels as if you are sitting in one long ride at a theme park (Star Tours, Back to the Future the Ride, etc.). The hand held camera actually made the experience real. Completely captivating my attention giving me a full rush of emotions that at times got the better of me. My survival instincts started to take over and I generally felt something for these people. It’s been a while since I felt so invested in a film and its characters. The overall experience was just exhilarating.

The young “unknown” actors in the film also bring a sense realism to the movie. If it were Brad Pitt as Rob it would have been Pitt on the poster holding some girl looking up in terror. The poster for this film sums it up with its iconic symbol destroyed forcing us to wonder what did that? What is the story behind it? Not will Pitt save the day? Instead it’s “Can I survive the movie”?

Kudos goes to J.J. Abrams and his Bad Robot Company for delivering a summer blockbuster three weeks into the New Year. I half expected it to be a balmy summer night when I walked out of the theater. The film invokes the best of science fiction and horror. While nodding to Toho Godzilla movies, ‘Cloverfield’ is a rocking time and one I want to sit through again. It is popcorn movie, yet one that will lose everything in the confines of your home while you watch it on your TV. You have to see ‘Cloverfield’ in the theater.


Read the staff review by Mania: CLOVERFIELD.
Showing 1 - 10 of 10 Comments
Comments
#1 - theCOLLECTOR  [Jan 20 2008, 10:07 am PST]
Sorry themovielord, I usually love your reviews, but cannot understand why you would give this an A. Other than the shaky cam, how is this movie different from Godzilla or the American version of Godzilla? The people in the film are so STUPID that it really dumbs New York down. After 9-11, do you think they would be THIS dumb?

CGI is good. But we don't see all that much, and when we have a chance of looking at the monster(s), we see screaming people. That is entertainment?

This is not a movie, but more of a live abstract painting. It had potential, but the hype was sickening.
#2 - themovielord  [Jan 20 2008, 2:47 pm PST]
Obviously theCOLLECTOR you are a fan of Godzilla movies. The guy in the suit has never really done it for me. I can see how if you are a fan of the genre that you would be disappointed. I like the "less is more" attitude when it comes to horror films. I only want to see bits and pieces never the whole thing because when you do it doesn't look real anymore. I agree with you on the 9-11 New Yorkers but if they were smart we would have no story.

If Frodo and Gandalf were smart they would have contacted the EAGLES and have themselves flown over Mt. Doom and dropped the ring in, then called it an afternoon. For movies and stories sometimes we have to give in to movie person stupidity or else we'd have nothing to watch.
#3 - GentlemenDeath  [Jan 20 2008, 6:35 pm PST]
I think an A is a perfect grade for this movie. I just got back and was very, very impressed with this movie.

Good review as well, Lord.
#4 - masterjedidude  [Jan 21 2008, 9:28 pm PST]
I'm one of the MANY people who suffered from motion sickness watching this mediocre film. I left the theater after about 30 minutes and went and got my money back. Don't get me wrong -- I like documentary-style films like Blair Witch, but this shaky-cam was freakin' ridiculous! Now, I'm reading where all of these theaters are posting warnings at the ticket booths and some theaters in LA are handing out barf bags.

Just Google: Cloverfield Motion Sickness

Unfortunately, the characters made me want to blow chunks as well. You would think New Yorkers would be smarter after 9-11, but these idiots really pissed me off with their stupidity. There was nothing like-able about them, so I hope the big monster ate them or stepped on them. This movie was a steaming pile of crap.
#5 - themovielord  [Jan 21 2008, 9:34 pm PST]
Wow, I have never left a movie before... not even to go to the bathroom...

Sorry masterjedidude, some movies aren't for everybody.

Atonement was an incredible film (trust me, use your 10 bucks towards that instead).
#6 - mlaforcer  [Jan 22 2008, 1:02 am PST]
Atonement, are you kidding me? LOL

No, go see There Will Be Blood and you will see a brilliant movie...It's in my top 5 now...

I'm sure Atonement was good in it's own right, as one of those chick flicks...

Oh, by the way I like the review and thought the movie deserved an A grade also...
#7 - themovielord  [Jan 22 2008, 8:58 am PST]
Atonement was incredible. It bordered on a chick flick but as a writer it was incredible.

There will be blood is on my list for this week.
#8 - GentlemenDeath  [Jan 23 2008, 12:10 pm PST]
Well, you knew what type of movie this was right, MasterJediDude? I mean, you knew it was going to be shaky, and if you have motion sickness, why would you even pay to go and see a film like this?
#9 - MIKWOZ  [Jan 25 2008, 9:45 am PST]
1) Loved the review MLord, good job

2) Loved the movie, and I am a fan of Giant monster movies. i thought the movie delivered a real sense of being right there in the midst of all the mayhem. The Monster wasn't what I expected and that is a really good thing! I'm glad it looks unconventional and wasn't a morphed version of other giant monsters. This was an "edge of your seat", roller coaster ride I truly enjoyed and will go see again, Kudos to Cloverfield!

3) I get motion sickness just thinking about motion sickness and this film did not bother me at all. I guess I was lucky:)
#10 - VerbalKent  [Jan 28 2008, 1:49 pm PST]
I never get motion sickness. Not on roller coasters, not on planes, not on the ocean. But I definitely started to feel sick during this movie. Which just heightened the sense of dread for me. Good movie and great review. I'm glad I paid to see this one in the theater.
Showing 1 - 10 of 10 Comments