I have to agree with the last post by SavageHenryLee. Anyone who's read this book knows that it just won't work as a movie or series of movies. We're not talking about Harry Potter here which we all knew was guaranteed to have a picture for every book. If Preacher is made into a movie: a) we'll be lucky if they stick to what made the book good and b) we'll be even more lucky if it does well enough for them to greenlight sequels so that we get to see the whole story.
I'd much prefere to see it as a show on HBO or Showtime; however, HBO has kind of passed the torch to Shotime in the original series department and it would require too big of a budget for SHO to consider.
I'd really love to see it on the big or small screen; don't get me wrong; I just hope that they'll leave it alone if they can't stay true to it.





I have felt for years that it is my duty as a somebody who really loved Preacher to say: A cinematic treatment of Preacher would be a really bad idea. As a fan, I am 100% AGAINST FILMING PREACHER.
You want to make a lame comic-book movie? Do Green Lantern. You want to do a Garth Ennis property? Do HITMAN. But leave Preacher alone. It's a wonderful comic, and it doesn't need to be watered down by getting pissed on by the film industry. I just hate that crap where people report that the fans are excited about shit like this. I know lots of Preacher fans, and only the real dumb-ass jock-rock types ever tell me that they want to see Preacher put in front of cameras.