DVD Review


In the Name of the King

By: Tim Janson
Review Date: Thursday, April 17, 2008

A review of this DVD can be summed up in two words: Uwe Boll.  The director, who gave us House of the Dead, Bloodrayne, and Alone in the Dark, returns with yet another video game adaptation, In the Name of the King.  It just goes to prove that even when given a sizable budget ($60 million) Boll still can’t deliver anything remotely resembling a good film.

Let’s start with the casting…Who on Earth thought Burt Reynolds, Ray Liotta, Leelee Sobieski and Matthew Lillard would be good fits for a heroic fantasy film?  Liotta, who is the villainous Gallian, looks like he’s playing Henry Hill as an evil wizard.  Reynolds looks silly as the aging King of Ehb, not to mention completely bored.  Lillard, best known for playing Shaggy in the Scooby Doo films, is just as obnoxious here as the king’s treacherous nephew. 


The story concerns the Wizard Gallian’s attempt to takeover the Kingdom of Ehb.  To do so he has raised an army of Krugs (think Orcs) and used his magic to make them more intelligent (think Saruman and the creation of the Uruk-Hai).  He sends his armies across the land attacking villages and kidnapping the people to be used as slaves in his underground pits, again in a scene straight out of LOTR: The Two Towers. 

Jason Stratham is a modest Farmer whose name, and get this, is Farmer!  He has no idea who his parents were and was raised by Norick (Ron Perlman).  Without a name of his own, he took the name Farmer because that’s what he is.  Makes you wonder what Norick called him when he was a child.  Norick and Farmer battle the Krugs until Norick and Farmer’s wife are captured.  Farmer eventually meets up with the King’s army where he finally learns about his past from the King’s wise Magus (John Rhys-Davies).  And of course this sets up a showdown between Farmer and Gallian with the fate of the kingdom in the balance.

There are a few good special effects in the film such as the Magus’ ability to turn into a puff of smoke and jet away.  The Krugs look like Orcs except that instead of make-up, they use cheap masks.  They all look alike although Boll was smart enough to never give you a long close-up of their faces.  Kristanna Loken is also in the film as Elora, the leader of a group of women who live in the treetops, clearly patterned after Elves. 

The only time you normally notice editing is when it’s very bad and I noticed the editing a lot in this film.  Scenes shift with an annoying abruptness.  On more than one occasion I thought my DVD had perhaps skipped a scene because the scene change was so sudden. 

In the Name of the King features some of the most boring battle scenes I’ve ever seen.  Men and Krugs get killed but it’s all dreadfully sanitized.  There’s no blood or gore to give the fights any sort of realism.  On another note of authenticity, some of the actors such as Rhys-Davies and Clare Forlani, have English accents while Sobieski, playing the Magus’ daughter, does not.  It just drives home the point that these are actors playing at being in a medieval fantasy film.

About the only positives in the film was Stratham’s athleticism and Liotta’s performance.  Even playing Henry Hill as an evil wizard, he was still fun.

Extras

The DVD comes with a few deleted/extended scenes and a behind-the-scenes featurette.  The featurette is a bland as the movie.  It follows cast and crew during filming but there are no interviews and no narration at all.  Just the filming set to a musical score.



More From Mania

King of the Lamp Vol.#01

KONG: KING OF ATLANTIS
(Friday, December 9, 2005)
B.B. King Turning 80 with the Blues
(Wednesday, July 6, 2005)
THE ESSENTIAL STEPHEN KING
(Wednesday, August 8, 2001)
Uwe Boll invites critics to fight him.
(Tuesday, June 13, 2006)
I Hate Uwe Boll
(Monday, December 3, 2007)

See more related content
More Content By Tim Janson
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1 2 3 > >>
audioslave69 • Apr 17, 2008, 02:16am •
It's not that i don't agree with u about Boll, but this a review and your spoiling stuff by saying who diesn and stuff, I dunno maybe im just being nit-picky but i dont like spoilers on reviews, good thing im not planing on watching this.

ponyboy76 • Apr 17, 2008, 03:08am •
I would usually agree but trust me, he`s not spoiling anything with these spoilers. This movie is not suitable for human consumption.

Whiskeymovie • Apr 17, 2008, 04:16am •
It looks better than his other movies, but that is like being the least skinny guy with full blown aids....maybe eat some shoorms and give it a go, I could always use a good larf.

Otter • Apr 17, 2008, 05:13am •
I saw a screener of this movie a few months ago, and I'd have to say that the worst thing about this dud was the soundtrack: it literally sounds like someone violently rubbed two electric violins together in the attempt to make music. Also, the music(or excuse for music) was so loud and obnoxious that it overpowered the dialogue of the actors and you couldn't understand what they were saying. Jason Statham was the best thing about this movie and that's not saying much, considering what he had to work with.

tjanson • Apr 17, 2008, 05:22am •
Audioslave...please tell me where I mentioned about any of the characters dying.

jedibanner • Apr 17, 2008, 06:40am •
This review tells me exactly what I needed to know...I will download this over the internet but would not pay to see this.

When I saw in the trailer that Burth Reynold was in this, I was so surprised I could not believe it. In any case, reviews like this are great because it's a review, of course they will tell you about the mobie and the plot and everything, IT'S A REVIEW!!!

Anyways, sad to see Jason Stateham choose to be into this, I guess he needed some extra money for Christmas or something.

captm0rgan77 • Apr 17, 2008, 07:09am •
I never blame actors for being in certain moveis. There are soooooo many reasons that actors play in movies. From gobs of money being thrown at them, to being under contract, to just trying to keep their name out there. But I won't deny the fact that some actors do just make bad choices in movies.
That being said. I would think that as soon as an actor sees the name Uwe Boll on anything they would run for the hills and hide in the trees. I mean... COME ON! I know some directors have started out bad and then turns out that they were just learning but this guy... You'd think he does this shit on purpose with the style he does his movies in. I believe he would turn in a steamy pill of crap even if the budget was 200 million and he had the best team of stunt men, set crews, costume designers, etc.

joeybaloney • Apr 17, 2008, 07:13am •
Edit button return. Columns widen. (Monitor nice I have and more utilized pleasing.) Paragraphs fun. Side quick links good. Free X-Box 360 Mania make with!!
Oh! And if you could keep current comment numbers on articles on the other tabs (News) and not just the home tab that would be great!
And why in the world would anyone have seen this movie?

joeybaloney • Apr 17, 2008, 07:14am •
I mean thanks for returning the edit button!!!

Merin • Apr 17, 2008, 08:54am •
Uwe Boll deserves much of the disparaging he receives. House of the Dead, alone, qualifies him for it.
That said, he's films have been steadily improving.

For all its badness, I somewhat enjoyed Bloodrayne.

And I kinda really did like In The Name of the King.

Was it great? No. Was it good? Eh ... Did it entertain me? Yes.

Liotta was bad, very bad - but I've never NOT thought Liotta was bad in ANYTHING I've ever seen him do, so how's that different?

I'm not going to defend the film from people who found it bad. But it entertained me.

One thing, Tim - realism with blood? In a fantasy movie, you need realism? You just praised a guy turning into smoke. These kind of comments baffle me, but whatever. How many war films and action films do you see where a grenade explodes and body PARTS, not bodies, go flying? Right, none.

Anyway, go ahead and rip on me for enjoying this film. Thing is I try and enjoy every film I take the time to see (yes, I TRIED to enjoy Transformers) instead of wasting time watching something I'm dead set on hating.

1 2 3 > >>
Login to post a comment!