Nanobots, Cybernetics and Androids-Oh My! - Mania.com



What Would Jessica Chobot Do?

11 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

Nanobots, Cybernetics and Androids-Oh My!

By Jessica Chobot     March 12, 2007


Jessica Chobot
© N/A

It’s normal to go through “phases” during your life. In high school I went through varying degrees of the teeny-bopper, Sadie Hawkins dance, dating the football player group. When that got annoying I switched it up to the pseudo-intellectual, poetry reading, Sandman comics, “Squid” clique (I believe you kids call it “Emo” now). From there it was a short skip and a hop on over to the Goth side via LARPing White Wolf’s Vampire: The Masquerade and wearing more eyeliner then a Siouxsie and the Banshees poseur.  

Most people that are accused of following a “type” usually righteously deny such an accusation and list one thousand and one things that separate themselves from whichever societal club they’ve pigeonholed themselves in. 

Personally, I miss being an obvious “type.” I drew great pleasure from dressing up in fishnets and spiked, steel-toed boots that I had acquired in trade with the token lesbian in my AP art class. Nowadays, instead of making up my face like some deranged Kabuki actor in love with Robert Smith,  I find myself pushing thirty, checking for wrinkles (I am highly suspicious that the area of my forehead between my two eyebrows will be the first to betray me), and carrying around one whopper of a secret which helps to make all my generic and everyday normalcy bearable. 

I want to be an android.     

I want to be able to plug myself directly into my computer. While my eyes go blank and I look as if I’m sitting there dead, what I’m actually doing is streaming through the matrix, checking out and commanding a gazillion different things at once, all via the internet. I want to be the Major from Ghost in the Shell, Neo from The Matrix, Molly from Neuromancer. 

Does science perpetuate sci-fi, or does sci-fi perpetuate science? I lean towards the latter. Science fiction is an art form and like every art form, it influences the imaginations of scientists and engineers. Through that influence, the execution of bringing such flights of fancy to fruition means that we eventually end up with nanobots in our bloodstream and USB plugs in the back of our heads.     

Morpheus wasn’t kidding when he said the rabbit hole runs deep. For one, the possibility of being able to buy next seasons reinforced cybernetic arms at the mall isn’t that far off. Just look at our cyberpunk pop culture for a hint at how fast we’ve come in such a short amount of time. Neuromancer, written and published back in 1984 by William Gibson, is often given credit for establishing today’s modern internet verbiage such as: matrix and cyberspace and has even been credited by Jack Womack for directly influencing the existence of the internet itself (if such is the case, I owe William Gibson a gigantic thank you for my job and Keanu Reeves should seriously consider doing the same). Sci-Fi movies have reigned supreme and gathered cult status at the box office with Dark City, The Matrix, Tron, Blade Runner and even a select big screen showing of the anime Ghost in the Shell. Videogames have advanced from 8bit graphics back in the 80s’ to today’s uber-realistic CGI mapping for home consuls (unless you’re Nintendo, but that’s a whole other ball of wax). Most schools have the internet and kindergartners are being trained on understanding and using computers. To think that we’ve gone from the mere concept of cybernetics and interweb connectivity with Gibson’s book back in ‘84 to the actual execution and advancement of in-home computers all within 23 years is as frightening as it is astounding. 

Second, is the idea of acquiring never ending life, or at least, never ending youth through cyberscience. Often sci-fi movies that follow in the vein of The Matrix and Blade Runner focus more on technology and humans problematic interactions with it than the original desires for creating that technology in the first place. The blue and red pill within The Matrix wasn’t just about Neo’s choice to awaken to the truth and become a matrix-wielding ass kicker. It was the acceptance that the truth and all it brings is volatile, dangerous and easily exploitable. 

As I’m sitting here writing this, I posed a question to my friend about the concept of self and soul within a cybernetic future. Essentially, the query I threw at him was: If one had the ability to download one’s soul and concept of self within a younger android body; does one become AI by default because at that point it becomes a copy of the original?  

His answer? Yes.  Due to the fact that the download is not the original but is essentially being filtered into hard code, it therefore has to be considered as artificial intelligence. 

My retort? True, but if you think that soul and concept of self is only in existence due to neurons and electrons firing off within the human mind which is, in basic terms, nothing more than an organic computer, isn’t the soul nothing more than an program in the first place? 

“Good point,” he said, “but that’s why it’s called artificial intelligence. Its no longer organic.” 

Certainly this is something to think about. Due to how vain humankind is, the option of downloading one’s “self” into a younger cybernetic body probably isn’t too far off in the future. Just imagine being able to live forever just by hopping from better, more highly developed body to body. Making a copy of a copy of a copy each and every time. At what point do you stop? Will you eventually copy yourself right out of existence? Who or what is one’s “true self” anyway? 

I’d put money down that I’ll see it happen within my life time....and I’m not the betting type. Looks like I just might get my wish after all. 

I’m choosing to take the blue pill (or is it the red?). 

Which one will you be taking?

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 11
1 2 >  >>  
michaelxaviermaelstrom 3/12/2007 6:23:37 AM
Good article JC. The pre-dawn meds at Maniac Asylum here are starting to kick in, so I appreciate something to focus on other than the howling wind in my head. re: "The blue and red pill within The Matrix wasn’t just about Neo’s choice to awaken to the truth and become a matrix-wielding ass kicker. It was the acceptance that the truth and all it brings is volatile, dangerous and easily exploitable." I would also suggest that "being given a choice" is a primary tool of Neo's (and Our - Ed) manipulation. Choice is presented as an element of "freedom", yet I find it is often offered by those that wish to _limit_ our freedom. "choice" often _controls and limits_ the individual's (or the public)'s potential-action-base by narrowing our list of options to a handful of proffered/pre-selected "choices". "Choice" AISI is _restriction_ masquerading as freedom. "Left Door or Right Door?" "Democrat or Republican?" "it's your free choice!" When voting _either way_ results in the same powerbrokers and overlords retaining control, I would stipulate that "choice" ought not be associated with any sort of freedom. Likewise in answer to left door or right door? perhaps it ought be, "piss off, there are 360 degrees of possibilities (in this dimension alone -Ed) here, I will choose my own direction and make my own door". imo we ought be weary of people that give us choices, because 8 times out of 2, that's not what they're really doing. re: A.I/Cyber-Existence/Non-Organic Intelligence/Droid-life. I think consciousness/the unique sense of self is a transferable property. I'm not too hung up on where it's stored. (though where sensory input is a function of the shell, I'd like it to be pleasant, so you know, put up some Jessica Chobot wallpaper in my case OK) Whether I'm in an organic casing or in free floating sub-molecular form orbiting a diety. Whether it's metalic, plastic, silicon, cyber, animal, mineral, vegetable, plant or other. I'll try them all. Why not. Hmmmmmmmmmmm(n) meds are wearing off, before I make passionate love with the rubber wall, I have a question. I agree with your statement that scifi leads science. I would even expostulate (at 2am with a bottle of intoxicant - Ed) that one of the fundamental truths of existence is that it is a property of "reality" that it will conform to man's focused desires. (or in un-oogabooga terms: that whatever man focuses his energy on, he will create - Ed) Please stop helping me Ed. So. We desired to tweek our biological construct, and now we can by genetic manipulation. We desire to transfer our consciousness to other shells, and as you say, we're in the process of developing a means. And we will no doubt accomplish it one day. but what of tweeking your consciousness / identity itself? would you tweek yours if you could? would you erase painful memories? would you add experiences that you never had to your consciousness? particularly when it's discovered that certain experiences result in higher levels of consciousness? and what about when it's discovered that not only experience but "understanding" itself is a transferable property? would you download someone else's "understanding" and add it to your own consciousness? Well, I have to go, it's time for my daily testicle tazer'ing. Enjoyed your article.
almostunbiased 3/12/2007 2:40:51 PM
michaelxaviermaelstrom, As wordy and lengthy as that was, you would have thought you'd had made a little sense. Choices are just that. Don't limit yourself to a set of choices, but come now there are only so many ligit choices in anything you do. Republican or democrat? How about Independant, or better yet, vote based on which individual you agree with regardless of those three, and don't vote if you don't know anything about any of them. It seems to me like you have a lot of choices on every ticket. Left door right door?? what is this a game show. Choices are all we have. That is what freedom is, and though people try to limit your choices in some things, that doesn't mean you have to ever choce what is given to you. I don't know maybe I misunderstood you, but you seemed like such a downer. I wrote a paper once on existence and I totally agree with your perception about it being based on reality, and better yet still on perception itself, which is the basis for reality. But I have to say other wise if you are trying to get us to think you're nuts, you are doing a wonderful job, and so is Ed. Oh and Jessica, thanks for taking my advice on the new picture. And you still look great even in focus.
Jchobot 3/12/2007 3:09:54 PM
I think freedom and choice are often mistaken as one in the same. Granted you do have the freedome to choose which choice you want to go with, but you're still stuck into strcuture, no matter how loose it is, by the choices themselves. however, that is one of those "chicken before the egg" arguments. When I mention Neo's choice between red and blue pill, I forgot to mention that not only is it a desire for truth, but also a whole new set of unique problems-one of those being youth. If we were given the option to live forever, but look old 9and continue to age), I think 90% of us would choose not to go with that option. however, if we are given the choice to live forever and remain young and beautiful-almost everyone would volunteer. Essentially, that's what Neo (and ourselves-in the long run) are faced with. Neverending life and youth. however, one doesn't have to read too many Anne Rice novels to figure out that eternity eventually becomes trite and tiresome. Technology, it's promises and the blue and red pill are much more than just unique and explorative electronics and offshoots. It's the Fountain of Youth itself! It's amazing to me that no matter how fancy and complicated what we create and strive for is....it is always just a shell for our basic humanistic needs.
browbeat 3/12/2007 3:16:43 PM
Back in my late teens I wrote a screenplay where the villain copied his mind into a cybernetic being to avoid death. Then looking at what was done with the villain in Robocop 2 and with Cameron Hodge in the X-Men comics, I started backing away from the idea (as my character was a cross between the two) and the screenplay has been shelved since. I would like to play a bit with this concept though and appreciate your insights. When I complete a few side animations I am working on, I may have to re-visit that screenplay and tinker with it again.
creamygnome 3/12/2007 3:47:06 PM
Have you read "The Singularity Is Near" by Ray Kurzweil? It's all about the whole computers overcoming humans in intellect and how we'll have to basically become machines to remain a viable part of society and whatnot. Interesting stuff. In other news...I'll plug into your computer anytime...even if you are pushing 30.
michaelxaviermaelstrom 3/12/2007 6:41:15 PM
(- JessicaChobot -) re: "Technology, it's promises and the blue and red pill are much more than just unique and explorative electronics and offshoots. It's the Fountain of Youth itself!" 'aye, it's an excellent observation and I agree with you. I would also stipulate that that is ALSO the *real* goal of the medical field. At this point we try to "Extend" life, but that is not its true purpose, extension is a stepping-stone to the REAL goal: Immortality. imo it has always been the primary driving goal of humanity. even Religion itself was an attempt at achieving immortality. and Science in all its forms is the modern equivalent, it too has taken on the same goal. re: "It's amazing to me that no matter how fancy and complicated what we create and strive for is....it is always just a shell for our basic humanistic needs." Amen Sister. *pause* I'm going to restrain myself from telling you what my current basic human needs are, since I have this thing for hyper-intelligent beautiful women, that can carry off a conversation as well as they can lingerie. (- AlmostUnbiased -) you figured out that I'm nutz? GIVE THE MAN A COLONOSCOPY PRIZE! DooDooDooDoo.. :D However if you think sanity is a pre-requisite for understanding parts of the nature of the universe, or for sussing "truth" I would suggest that it's more often the opposite. Some level of INSANITY is required to understand how our insane universe operates! (or maybe understanding any part of it drives you insane? - Ed) "Sane" "normal" people understand only what they're told to believe, they are classified as "sane" because they agree with the majority view. To me, the majority-view while comforting and lovely and wonderful and stability generating, for all that, it is 8 times out of 2, WRONG, or is several degrees of magnitude or so off from the real truth. My point re "choice" may not have been clear enough because I freely admit I can't maintain sanity. at least not for very long. but on the other hand it may have been VERY clear, and what you are doing now is precisely what Neo did when he was told "the truth" about reality? which was to buck it, to scream "NOOOO I WANT OUT, LET ME OUT! PISS OFF YOU GIMP! LET ME OUT!" :D So I'll try to make my point clearer re: "proffered choice" as the anti-thesis of "Freedom". _once_ Neo accepts that his life's direction will be spent choosing from choices other people offer him, he becomes little more than a programmable manipulated tool. Neo doesn't have ANY choice (and neither do any of us) once he/we allow our attention and therefore destiny to be based and focused on "choices" offered to us by other people. Morpheus _manipulates_ Neo into his world by offering him a choice, The Oracle _manipulates_ Neo into becoming The One by offering him a choice, The Architect _manipulates_ Neo by offering him a choice, et cetera, and the result is that Neo does exactly what he was pre-programmed to do, every step of the way. Like a rat in a labyrinth, the freedom to choose a path is an illusion; what looks like several "choices" of paths before you, all ultimately lead to the same place. Namely precisely where the controller wants us to go. Reality wasn't the only illusion in The Matrix, "Choice" was the primary illusion. Neo never had any freedom as a result of "proffered choice"; quite the opposite, his freedom to choose his own destiny was circumvented. And it's the same in the "real" world. Yes, we have _the potential_ for true freedom, and that is our western system's saving grace, but we have been manipulated into desiring comfort to such a degree that very few exercise any real freedom here. I think we really do live in The Matrix, in its definitional sense that the wool is over our eyes, most of the time. And maybe that's why The (original) Matrix struck such a chord with us? because on some level we recognized the correlation to our world. Every time someone offers us a "choice" between A, B or C, the millions of possible directions our lives could have gone, have just been narrowed down to _3_. And if you examine those "choices" proffered to us closely, you might even find that 1 of them is designed to be so outlandish that you'd never pick it. and the other 2 both lead to the same place. Now if you'll excuse me my batch of butterscotch pudding is ready and I have to go see if I can find Jessica's cell here at Maniac Asylum. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Jakester 3/13/2007 8:32:39 AM
Ma'am, I am a police officer, and I think you've been drinking. I'd like to give you a breathalyzer test.
BRoe 3/14/2007 12:24:15 AM
I prefer Kurt Vonnegut's theory in Blackbeard. That the human body is nothing but a radio receiver. As he says "Just because music comes from a little box we call a radio, that doesn't mean there's a symphony orchestra inside."
1 2 >  >>  

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

POPULAR TOPICS