Movie Review
24 Comments | Add a Comment

0


PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: DEAD MAN'S CHEST

By: Rachel Reitsleff
Date: Thursday, July 06, 2006

2003's PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: THE CURSE OF THE BLACK PEARL surmounted what would seem to be the rather powerful curse of being based on a Disneyland ride, turning out to be hugely enjoyable and even earning a deserved Oscar nomination for leading man Johnny Depp. The film managed to wittily incorporate both the overall themes and specific details of the ride while coming up with a nicely complex plot, entertaining characters especially Depp's eccentric, fey Captain Jack Sparrow swell action and a fairly cool mythology to explain all those sword-wielding skeletons.

In PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: DEAD MAN'S CHEST, Jack and his fellow pirate survivors of the first film (where they were under the now-lifted curse that prevented them from dying but also turned them into living skeletons under a full moon) are searching for a mysterious key. Meanwhile, Jack's erstwhile rescuers and sort-of friends, governor's daughter Elizabeth Swann (Keira Knightley) and upright blacksmith/son of a pirate Will Turner (Orlando Bloom) are under sentence of death by East India Trading Company representative Cutler Beckett (Tom Hollander), who has taken over the island from Elizabeth's protesting father (Jonathan Pryce). Beckett will commute the sentence only if Will brings him the erratic (and, we soon surmise, enchanted) compass belonging to Jack Sparrow. Will isn't the only one seeking Jack so is mortal man turned sea spirit Davy Jones (Bill Nighy), the formidable captain of the Flying Dutchman and her unusual crew, who is trying to collect on the supernatural debt Jack owes him. Throw in Elizabeth's resentful ex Norrington (Jack Davenport), Will's long-lost father (Stellan Skarsgard), a stupendously destructive sea monster and some unexpected romantic longings and we've got ...

Well, a lot less than it feels like we should have, especially considering that most of the key personnel from PIRATES I are on board, including director Gore Verbinski and screenwriting team Ted Elliott & Terry Rossio. It must be noted up front that the CGI makeup on Davy Jones and his crew constitute a must-see feat live actors motivate the performances, but as they are a combination of human and sea creature, the eyes and mouths belong to the real players, while other facial features are added via seamless computer animation. Nighy's Davy Jones is particularly astonishing to watch, the squid tentacles around his face expanding and contracting individually to match each brusque reaction (Nighy is a splendid villain, by the way).

But other spectacles within the narrative don't fare so well. It seems almost as though the filmmakers had more dramatic plot ideas than comedic bits and decided to balance the two by repetitively stretching the humorous setpieces until they reached the required length to make them even. The result is a series of visual gags that go on so long that, for anyone but the staunchest PIRATES fans, the eventual sentiment is, "Get on with it already!" In some movies that are two-and-a-half hours long, the running time is justified, but here, easily half an hour could be cut without damaging the story or the performances in any way.

Depp's Jack Sparrow is still a one-of-a-kind characterization, and still fun to watch, but there's a sense of things being milked just a bit this time. Bloom is suitably stalwart and gets some agreeable funny moments, Knightley gets to be sexy and swashbuckling, Hollander is aptly dry and self-assured as the baddie and Skarsgard brings a level of conviction to his character that makes us believe he's been going through all that he's been going through since last he saw Will.

There is fun to be had in PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: DEAD MAN'S CHEST, but getting to it takes more patience that should be required it's got good parts, but there are a lot of times when we wish it would just speed up and get to them.

Related Products



User Reviews
Comments/Responses
1 2 3 > >>
• Jul 06, 2006, 09:00am •
B-freaking-minus? .... Fair enough.

It's up there in the A's for me. Loved it. A great continuation of the original's spirit. You've all heard how terrific the CG is on Jones and his crew, so I won't even bother going there (for now).

What I would liketo do is address the main gripe of this review - the extended comedic sequences. Assuredly they could have been trimmed out and the plot wouldn't have suffered, but when they're this good why would you? The audience I saw the film with laughed throughout. It would have been a shame to cut these sequences so a few killjoys can watch a plot and move on.

I don't think it takes a staunch pirate fan at all. Just a love of fun and adventure. I'm willing to bet there'll be spoilers aplenty by the end of the first page of comments, but I will save the recap of my personal favourite moments until more people have seen it - you don't want to be spoiled! (Particularly for the final reveal! *cheers*)

• Jul 06, 2006, 09:00am •
B-freaking-minus? .... Fair enough.

It's up there in the A's for me. Loved it. A great continuation of the original's spirit. You've all heard how terrific the CG is on Jones and his crew, so I won't even bother going there (for now).

What I would like to do is address the main gripe of this review - the extended comedic sequences. Assuredly they could have been trimmed out and the plot wouldn't have suffered, but when they're this good why would you? The audience I saw the film with laughed throughout. It would have been a shame to cut these sequences so a few killjoys can watch a plot and move on.

I don't think it takes a staunch pirate fan at all. Just a love of fun and adventure. I'm willing to bet there'll be spoilers aplenty by the end of the first page of comments, but I will save the recap of my personal favourite moments until more people have seen it - you don't want to be spoiled! (Particularly for the final reveal! *cheers*)

• Jul 06, 2006, 09:00am •
Crud. Sorry for double (now triple) post.

• Jul 06, 2006, 10:03am •
Saw it and agree with most of the criticisms, but still liked it more -- B to B+ for me. That's a tad disappointing considering the first is among my faves of all time, but I still enjoyed Depp and especially Davey Jones. For me I felt two things -- it needed one more hard edit (maybe lose 20 minutes or so) and it also felt like the 2nd leg in a trilogy; it was setting up a third installment instead of being a complete adventure in and of itself. Thus far it is my favorite among the summer Blockbusters (which doesn't say much, I know) ranking slightly above the surprising MI:3, a full grade above X Men, and miles beyond the insufferably sappy and unoriginal Superman Shouldn't Have Returned.

almostunbiased • Jul 06, 2006, 12:53pm •
I'm seeing this tomorrow and I can't wait.
The longer the better.

• Jul 07, 2006, 08:34am •
i am so psyched in seeing this. the first time i watched it, I didn't know what to expect... it was a great adventure that sucked me in and had me.

like kentmid said the first one is also among my faves of all time. my expectations are a little high for this but i have no doubt that Verbinski will pull it off for me (i've been a fan of his work since Mousehunt).

• Jul 07, 2006, 08:37am •
correction... the first time i saw 'The Curse of the Black Pearl' i didn't know what to expect... after all it was based off a Disney ride but Verbinski made it happen and, arguably, made one of the best Pirate movies ever. i'm hopin' to see this today and i will post again on what i thought of 'Dead Man's Chest'.

coldhardtruth • Jul 07, 2006, 07:39pm •
I saw this movie last night. I liked it, but I did feel that there was too much forced comic relief. It was also a bit too long. Otherwise, I liked the movie. Nothing spectacular, but then again, neither was the first one.

I agree with the review.

• Jul 08, 2006, 08:49am •
I saw this Movie at a midnight show thursday night. The crowd loved it. I have to say that of all the "big movies" I was waiting on this summer this is the only one that had enough story to justify its length. Superman (which seesaws with Batman as my favorite superhero) let me down on the story dept, as did X-men. Pirates did not. I enjoyed my 2 hours and 30 mins.

newcastle • Jul 08, 2006, 08:50am •
I have been looking forward to this movie all summer. Unfortunately I was very disappointed. Very little humor, ridiculous action, and easily 30 minutes too long. The special effects were great but they didn't keep me from looking at my watch over and over again. I give it C. I know this one is supposed to set up the third one, but thats no excuse for this turd. A complete letdown compared to the first film. Hopefully, this trilogy isn't heading the way of the Matrix.

1 2 3 > >>
Login to post a comment!