Movie Review


RAMBO

By: Robert T. Trate, Columnist
Review Date: Sunday, January 27, 2008

This is ‘Rambo’. If you don’t understand what “this is Rambo” means or all that it encompasses then do not see ‘Rambo’. It isn’t a film for you. If you know that Rambo will live “day by day” or that all he wants is for his country to love him as much as he loves it then you are ready to see ‘Rambo’. Sylvester Stallone capitalized on the success of his final Rocky movie, ‘Rocky Balboa’ and got the fourth Rambo film green lighted. Taking a gamble on the other character that has made him famous the world over. Stallone with his headband tightened and giant knife in hand took us out for one action packed blood soaked adventure.

Now you know the plot isn’t going to be very deep. In a nut shell John Rambo lives a solitary existence in Thailand, living day by day as a river boat captain and snake wrangler. John is approached by some missionaries who want to pay him to take them up river to Burma. John straight out tells them no and that they wouldn’t change anything. Sarah (Julie Benz) the only woman in the group of missionaries persuades John to take them up river. Sarah convinces him that maybe he should start living for something instead of just living. Of course this strikes a chord with John and he decides to take the missionaries up river to the worn torn country. 

After a run in with river pirates (a quick fix to satisfy the action junkie who maybe growing bored) John brings the missionaries to the destination and heads home. So by this time, albeit quick, you are ready for the missionaries and their people to get into harms way. It isn’t very long before Stallone’s execution of the chaos and mayhem by the Burmese government is put into full swing. These soldiers are monsters and brutal killers all who deserve the wrath of Rambo. As the chaos continues and many of the nameless missionaries start to die, I realize that out of all of them there are none I care about except Sarah. Perhaps this is a choice by the writer/ director to streamline the characters? Nevertheless, Sarah is the one that needs saving and she is the one that we care about. Because she has not only made John care about what’s going but us as well (because in all honesty, we’re here to see Rambo kick ass).

John is approached by the missionaries’ pastor to take a team of mercenaries to the exact location where he left them and bring any survivors home. There are small but important moments that develop the mercenaries. Thankfully Stallone did not make them as cookie cutter as their missionary counterparts. The addition of the mercenaries also brings up Stallone addressing his age and showing that John is not a one man army anymore. That he will indeed need help. This brings about a plausibility that has not existed since the first ‘Rambo’. John isn’t Superman, but he can be persuasive enough when the mercenaries want to turn tail and head back to civilization.

The final twenty minutes of the film is one action packed slaughter fest. The action junkie will not be disappointed by ‘Rambo’. What I found to be completely refreshing in this installment of the Rambo Saga was the film lacked any cheesy one liner’s. Nor a big final fight between the bad guy and John or even the bad guy’s big henchmen (there wasn’t even such a character). Stallone even left any kind of love story out of the film. Refreshing to a genre that often spends way too much time on something the audience doesn’t want or care for. Yet, Stallone’s most brilliant decision to humanize his onscreen persona is to have the character of Rambo addressed by his first name. This simple touch brings him further into the real world and erases the Rambo/ Superman persona enough to make him a human being.

Stallone did his homework and brought the character of Rambo into the twenty first century while giving the fans of the original trilogy everything they wanted. He gave us story about an old warrior who was finally able to embrace what he is. This gave the character the dignity to go home. 



More Content By Robert T. Trate, Columnist
New CINEMA OF FEAR Figures
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Next for NECA in 2008
(Thursday, February 21, 2008)
HELLBOY II Toys: Series 1
(Wednesday, February 20, 2008)
JUSTICE LEAGUE:NEW FRONTIER
(Wednesday, February 20, 2008)
HEROES Toys: Series 2 & 3
(Tuesday, February 19, 2008)
Strike Season
(Tuesday, February 19, 2008)
AMERICAN GANGSTER
(Sunday, February 17, 2008)
SPIRAL
(Saturday, February 16, 2008)
Gone Baby Gone
(Wednesday, February 13, 2008)
Love, Mania Style
(Tuesday, February 12, 2008)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
theCOLLECTOR • Jan 27, 2008, 05:36pm •
A B+? Really? I would give it a solid A. I thought the movie was great, unbelievably GRAPHIC, but a great movie regardless. Stallone (even hopped up on growth hormones) is a really talented guy.

Stallone wrote and directed a really fun and eye-opening movie. Although, I hope this is his last sequel to his 80's blockbusters. Yet, then again, he surprised the HELL out of me with Rocky Balboa.

Oh, and Boxofficemojo.com staes Rambo is number 1, even though it made less than Meet the Spartans. I was hoping Rambo would be number one....but legitimately.

Hobbs • Jan 27, 2008, 05:47pm •
I agree Collector, it's a solid A. If you are looking for the next Titanic look elsewhere. It's about 1 1/2 hours long and it goes by quick.

I'm surprised Meet the Spartans was number one at the box office but that's more of a date movie than Rambo is. Until the actual numbers are released it may be too close to call but Spartans have about a $500 per screen lead over Rambo. It will be interesting to see how it does in its second weekend.

Sly looks good for 61.


sportwarrior • Jan 27, 2008, 06:03pm •
I'd love to give Rambo a chance but I fear it may just be a little too bloody for my tastes... Then again I did love 300, but that wasn't exactly infused with a ton of realism.

And I can't believe Meet the Spartans made any money at all. The American public never fails to eat up total trash like this, does it...

calhob • Jan 27, 2008, 06:12pm •
Rambo was amazing. It was supposed to be an action movie and really nothing else and it was just that.

POSSIBLE SPOILER************

One thing that surprised me was the fact that they showed some violent child deaths. It took me by surprise and they really creeped me out. But I guess if you want to go for a real graphic and realistic movie then you have to include everything.... and I'm not complaining.

But I still liked Cloverfield better.....

hanso • Jan 27, 2008, 06:28pm •
Wow, a B+, really?......I'm checking it out next weekend but over on Rotten Tomatoes it has like 38% rating. I know their ratings mean jack but sometimes when they go really low the movies turn out like crap.
Anyway looking foward to Rambo, snuck in for a peak and it looked good.

troopershades • Jan 27, 2008, 06:54pm •
John Rambo + .50 cal machine gun = happy viewers

exfan • Jan 27, 2008, 07:55pm •
since friday i try to check on the wed how is going, i mean the box office. I find saturday the daily boxoffice mojo, it was 6 millions. Some predict he will finish around 17 for the week end, at the first place. well the week end gross was 18, better from expectation, but at the second place. I predict a good week at the first place, that s movies will run better than rocky balboa, without mention DVD sales...Well done stallone, you can take a breack now

maxx1mus • Jan 27, 2008, 10:00pm •
i saw rambo and it was A+ ACTION ASS KICKING MOVIE LOVED IT !!!!!!!!!!

wessmith1966 • Jan 27, 2008, 10:24pm •
Good review, although I'd have to join many of my fellow readers and give the movie a solid A. Stallone made a hell of a movie. This wasn't the oiled down and musclebound Rambo of parts 2 and 3, but the gritty John Rambo of First Blood. The supporting characters were fleshed out just enough to make them real, but not too much to distract from Rambo's storyline. Julie Benz is a favorite actress of mine, so I was glad to see her on the big screen.

The violence was very graphic and combined with the look of the film and cinematography, gave the movie a very realistic look. People didn't just fall over when shot of go bounding through the air off a trampoline when a bomb exploded; heads exploded and body parts sailed through the air with the greatest of ease.

I was a little surprised at the ending, but after all of the crap Rambo's been through in the first three movies he deserves a happy ending.

shadowprime • Jan 28, 2008, 05:32am •

Kinda Rambo related, but also more general...

I know some folks here get very "into" discussing the "letter ratings" given movies on the site, and, generally, I am not one of them. But, when I spotted the B+ on RAMBO, it got me thinking... when reviewing a movie, what standards apply? Do you judge a movie - any movie - in the LARGEST context? Or do you evaluate it within its genre?

Take RAMBO... is RAMBO a B+ movie, or is it a B+ "Violent Action Movie"? I can see the latter, but I can't really see the former. Not trying to pick a fight with RAMBO fans... a LOT of movies that I enjoyed, greatly, would be judged the same way (great if you are a fan of the genre, but probably of limited crossover appeal).

I don't have any easy answers, and to be honest, I find the latter kind of info most useful when I read a review (i.e. "If you are a fan of giant monsters, you will enjoy this movie!").

Just wondering...

Shadow

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!