Movie Review


RESIDENT EVIL: EXTINCTION

By: Abbie Bernstein
Review Date: Saturday, September 22, 2007

Resident Evil: Extinction is the third film in a series based on a videogame. This isn’t necessarily the most promising of origins, but this time around, the filmmakers do an extraordinarily good job of making a rousing horror/sci-fi movie. There are a few game elements to honor the premise’s roots, but this absolutely works on its own terms.
 
In the 2002 original Resident Evil feature, written and directed by Paul W.S. Anderson, who wrote and produced the sequel and the new film, we meet our heroine Alice (Milla Jovovich), who finds she must fight her way out of an underground office/lab populated by ravenous zombies and monsters, products of a genetic experiment gone terribly wrong. In 2004’s Resident Evil: Apocalypse, Alice discovers that she has been genetically tampered with herself, giving her some superpowers that are helpful in combating the menaces that have escaped the lab and now rampage through quarantined Raccoon City. In Resident Evil: Extinction, the zombie plague has spread across the planet, pretty much wiping out not only civilization, but a good portion of nature as well, transforming most of the globe into arid scrub and desert. After an opening that reminds us of how the first film started, followed by an eye-opening twist, our attention is divided between Alice on her own in the wasteland, a survivor’s convoy led by Claire Redfield (Ali Larter) and a well-equipped, sterile military/scientific complex far underground, where Dr. Isaacs (Iain Glen, reprising his role from Apocalypse) is still up to no good.
 
While Extinction has the set-pieces that fans of this particular franchise will respect – zombies, mutant dogs, homicidal crows, huge sentient homicidal hunks of tortured flesh – it is reminiscent in the best way of the 2004 remake of Dawn of the Dead. It has ferocious action, bloodshed, effective jump scares – but it also has characters we like (and some we despise in an “I can’t wait ‘til you get yours” way), whose strategies and abilities propel the storyline, rather than just serving as cannon fodder. Jovovich utterly cements her status as a cult action star, as compelling as Hugh Jackman or Jason Statham, giving Alice a sense of compassion and conviction, as well as being extremely believable in her stuntwork. Larter gives Claire the requisite gravity her protective role calls for, as well as looking very good shooting, kicking and punching the undead. Oded Fehr, reprising his role from Apocalypse, is again charming and suggests great resourcefulness, and Glen makes Dr. Isaacs as confident and assured a mad scientist as any movie could want.
 
Director Russell Mulcahy and writer Anderson throw their all into conceptualizing the scares, the thrills and the surprises – there are some shots that literally make your breath catch, along with wild zombie carnage, a hell-for-leather homage to Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds and a truly nightmarish opening sequence. Resident Evil: Extinction is impressive stuff, the best entry so far in its series. More, it’s very satisfying and just plain bloody good fun.


More Content By Abbie Bernstein
THE STRANGERS
(Friday, May 30, 2008)
IRON MAN
(Friday, May 2, 2008)
PROM NIGHT
(Saturday, April 12, 2008)
THE RUINS
(Friday, April 4, 2008)
AMERICAN ZOMBIE
(Saturday, March 29, 2008)
FUNNY GAMES
(Friday, March 14, 2008)
CJ7
(Friday, March 7, 2008)
10,000 B.C
(Thursday, March 6, 2008)
PENELOPE
(Friday, February 29, 2008)
VANTAGE POINT
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
metalwater • Sep 22, 2007, 05:53am •
Resident Evil is trash...but instead of spending their time and money coming up with the next Star Wars, Matrix, or Terminator...the studio here keeps on pumping out this bottom dweller worthy sewage???

Has Russell Mulcahy career fallen this low??? How very sad for him as he was once considered a promising genius.

akobus • Sep 22, 2007, 09:53am •
I agree with the review, the Resident Evil films have all been fun action/suspense shootem ups, and I have thoroughly enjoyed all of them.

The poster above me is just another game purist who obviously just cannot get past himself to enjoy the fun films.

daforce • Sep 22, 2007, 10:47am •
Metalwater isn't a game purist, he's just someone that likes to trash movies that he's never seen. At least that's all I've ever seen him do here at Mania.

I saw the movie, and I put up my review on Thurs. night. It actually follows "Day of the Dead" more than "Dawn of the Dead". There's even a kind of nod to Bub from Romero's "Day" in there.

Not bad, but not worth a full price ticket.

maverickrenegade • Sep 22, 2007, 12:57pm •
bottom line ... these movies suck ... no paragraph long reasoning needed

gauleyboy420 • Sep 22, 2007, 02:01pm •
If a movie isn't worth a full price ticket
IT SUCKS!

ALIEN • Sep 22, 2007, 03:46pm •
Not to dismiss your view, gauleyboy420, but I rather enjoyed Resident Evil: Extinction. Mind you this is not an oscar worthy movie, but it was well beyond the best out of the three. If the Second is counted at all, which I think it should not.

No one seems to mention how well Ali Larters and Mike Epps acted in this movie. It was actually really good.


makabriel • Sep 22, 2007, 03:50pm •
I'm glad I can go to movies and enjoy them. Must be hard to be entertained when you're expecting Oscar style theatrics out of every movie made.

Merin • Sep 22, 2007, 05:37pm •
Great review.
Good grade.
Good movie.

I agree. B to B +. As much fun, and as different on its own, as the previous two.

gauleyboy420 • Sep 22, 2007, 06:03pm •
I hacen't seen it yet, I was only commenting on daforce's review. He gives it a B+, but then states it's not worth a full price ticket. Thats very contradictory.
I think any movie above a C- is worth the full price of a ticket. JMHO
Speaking of good movies,
I went and spent another $24 hard earned dollars supporting Transformers in IMAX. It's even better in IMAX

metalwater • Sep 22, 2007, 08:11pm •
Hey, if they make Pac Man the movie...and it is terrible, I'm bold enough to say it. So when it comes to Resident Evil I said it. Hell, I saw the Mario Brothers movie...Mortal Combat, Tomb Raider...and Street Fighter, and they all sucked!!! Now, if they make a good video game movie, i'll say that too...but they haven't...something which I have pointed out.

I saw the original Resident Evil and it is garbage...and had nothing to do with the game...and all of you know it, except for several loose references. But the point is, it was supposedly a prequel to the original game...and that was done for the sole purpose of denying the original people who wrote the scripted story for the game certain profits from the movie as well as denying them creator and story credit on the film. It's rather involved, but that's why you rarely, if at all, see a straight game to movie storyline translation...that isn't greatly altered by film producers, execs, and studios. It's all about money, ain't a damn thing funny about it.

Look folks, all these studios are doing, is buying the rights to a popular game's title (and basic elements of the game), for its great market value (high marketplace recognition among the public and the media), in hopes of pulling a bait and switch on uneducated audiences...who don't realize they are being duped!!!

It's like licensing the name of McDonald's and placing the name on Denny's restaurants. The name alone will attract customers...but they won't be getting McDonald's food, just the name and some of the bags, cups, and hamburger wrappers...but what's inside will still be Denny's food...not McDonald's...and that is what you have gotten with Resident Evil--the game name on the movie, and very little else!!!

This reminds me of the phony McDonald's called McDenodnal's in the Eddie Murphy movie Coming To America.

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!