Movie Review
3 Comments | Add a Comment

0


SAW IV

By: Abbie Bernstein
Date: Saturday, October 27, 2007

As sequels go, Saw III was fairly clever, tying together what had seemed to be loose plot ends from the original Saw and Saw II. It seemed to wrap everything up with a bloody bow, leaving the audience to wonder what could be left to cover in a fourth Saw. The filmmakers don’t have an entirely good answer for that question. They want to give legitimacy to further installments in the franchise, while maintaining the franchise’s inventive gore and narrative trickiness.
 
It must be said that director Darren Lynn Bousman and writers Patrick Melton & Marcus Dunstan, working from a story crafted by the scenarists and Thomas Benton, do a fine job with the former, starting with the autopsy of the Saw series’ primary character Jigsaw (Tobin Bell). This leaves no doubt that Jigsaw is no longer among the living, yet he’s managed to conceal an audiotape on his person. Meanwhile, SWAT commander Rigg (Lyriq Bent), understandably distressed at the losses in his department, searches for missing colleagues. Due to Jigsaw’s method of leaving a trail for Rigg to follow, he’s soon a suspect, with police detective Hoffman (Costas Mandylor) and two F.B.I. agents (Scott Patterson, Athena Karkanis) on his trail, when they’re not interrogating Jigsaw’s ex-wife (Betsy Russell).
 
Jigsaw’s back story makes for some entertaining drama, principally because Bell visibly delights in getting to show a hitherto unseen side to the character. The rest of the cast is good, with Bent persuasively distraught, torn and furious, sometimes all at once.
 
Part of the problem with Saw IV is that the new film replicates narrative tricks from its predecessors – they’re not surprising here so much as they’re distracting. The storytelling style is also very diffuse, so that we start to lose track of who’s where, and instead of being intriguing, it’s just baffling. However, the torturous contraptions are up to snuff, so to speak, the franchise’s visual ethos of creepy grunge is maintained and the whole notion of trying to get people to appreciate life by depriving them of freedom, limbs, skin, etc. is as debatable as ever.
 
Bottom line: if you like the Saw films, Saw IV isn’t the best of the bunch, but it’s recognizable as a member of the tribe. If you don’t like Saw films, this has nothing that will change your mind.


Related Products
User Reviews
Comments/Responses
1
Quatchkopf • Oct 28, 2007, 01:21pm •
I SAW it, like it. Characters in movie never listen. I guess if they did there wouldn't be a movie.

myklspader • Oct 28, 2007, 03:57pm •
Went yesterday and I gotta admit the really one solid reason I have for watching this series is the fact that with each movie the producers, writers, and director(s) keep digging themselves into a ditch and the next one is really fun to watch cause I wanna see them explain a way around or out of that ditch they created in the last installment. That aside, it was fun for what it was.

Spoiler (kinda): Next installment they need to start fresh with a character of sorts who goes through the history and the production team can start dumping off most of the people from the last 4 and focus on the other loose ends to be tied (like Matt's daughter and Gordon: dead or alive?). I think Patterson's character is a good character/person for that purpose... seeing that he is I guess around still.

nwobatman21 • Oct 28, 2007, 10:03pm •
How did the detective getting teamed up with jigsaw. thats the only thing i could not figure out. can some help me?

1
Login to post a comment!