Movie Review

Send to a Friend



To: (email)


To: (name)


From: (name)


Message:



A SCANNER DARKLY

By: Rachel Reitsleff
Review Date: Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Technically, A SCANNER DARKLY is science fiction. After all, it takes place seven years from now (whenever "now" is), concerns an illegal drug that is fictional (though it does what plenty of real illegal drugs do), has a bit of police technology that doesn't exist in reality and has the genre pedigree of being based on a novel by Philip K. Dick. However, screenwriter/director Richard Linklater is less interested in the what-if aspects than in capturing the alternating friendly, funny and frustrating dynamics between the little group at the center of the film: Bob Arctor (Keanu Reeves), an undercover narcotics officer who has just been assigned to spy on himself his bosses don't know his real identity paranoid know-it-all James Barris (Robert Downey, Jr.), mellow Luckman (Woody Harrelson), almost permanently tripping Freck (Rory Cochrane) and Donna (Winona Ryder), the pretty dealer Arctor is involved with, despite her aversion to being touched.

There are some interesting issues about identity raised here, especially courtesy of one of SCANNER's most interesting visual effects, the "scramble suit" that changes the wearer's appearance every few seconds, rendering Arctor (and his boss) unrecognizable to all. It's a nice metaphor that's allowed to work on its own; the film doesn't beat us over the head with it. Likewise, the rotoscoping technique that captures every detail of the actors' performances yet renders them as animated characters serves to underscore Arctor's sense of detachment and slight remove from reality he comprehends what he's seeing, but somehow it has an artificial quality for him.

So far, so good. Linklater and his cast, who mesh beautifully, are fully into exploring the neurotic, sometimes sad, often very funny details of these people's lives. At its best, SCANNER is sometimes reminiscent of BOOGIE NIGHTS this is not by any means a wonderful world we've entered, but it's populated by people who are mostly good at heart and their own worst enemies. Threat of the law isn't going to steer them straight only experience (if anything) can do that.

The problem is that, in some fundamental way, SCANNER's musings on identity, observations about the chemically dependent life and playful verisimilitude in human interactions never come together in a fully cohesive whole. It's not that we can't follow the story Linklater lays out the pieces skillfully enough for us to track but rather that perhaps Bob as we come to know him doesn't have a firm enough identity for us to worry that he may lose it. We also get that both Linklater and Dick think the "war on drugs," at least as it's currently being conducted, is inefficient at best and hypocritical and deadly at best. Somehow, this notion gets diffused when put together with the movie's other elements, which also tend to suffer from isolation.


A SCANNER DARKLY is intriguing; what's sad is that we can see where it could have been compelling. It's intelligent and interesting filmmaking that nevertheless ripples with unfulfilled potential.



More From Mania

SCANNER in dark theaters

Musical Intrigue for A Scanner Darkly
(Thursday, June 29, 2006)
SCANNER DARKLY Trailer Online
(Sunday, February 20, 2005)
Cool SCANNER imagery
(Friday, January 7, 2005)
Four more join A SCANNER DARKLY
(Tuesday, May 4, 2004)
Keanu now addicted to A SCANNER DARKLY
(Tuesday, March 30, 2004)
Clooney, Soderbergh get SCANNER DARKLY
(Wednesday, February 13, 2002)

See more related content
More Content By Rachel Reitsleff
88 Minutes
(Friday, April 18, 2008)
ALIENS VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM
(Wednesday, December 26, 2007)
HITMAN
(Saturday, November 24, 2007)
SLEUTH
(Friday, October 12, 2007)
THE SEEKER: THE DARK IS RISING
(Sunday, October 7, 2007)
HATCHET
(Friday, September 7, 2007)
RUSH HOUR 3
(Friday, August 10, 2007)
STARDUST
(Friday, August 10, 2007)
THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM
(Friday, August 3, 2007)
SUNSHINE
(Friday, July 20, 2007)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1
• Jul 12, 2006, 03:17am •
Films that are interesting but 'ripple with unfulfilled potential' deserve a C at most. I haven't seen it, but based on this woman's reaction, but if the script is as slipshot as this suggests it can't be good. I don't think Linklater is as good as people suggest, personally. I think only half of Waking Life actually works, and, unfortunately, it's not the half the script falls into.

Oh, and every Cinescape review 'ripples' with indecision and mediocrity.

• Jul 12, 2006, 06:34am •
Dear Cinescape,
Please change your rating system. I respectfully disagree with bryanway that all of your reviews ripple with indecision and mediocrity - I typically quite like the reviews themselves. But the endless comments from the readership (those happy to throw out their opinions anyway), surely indicates that the way movies are rated by the reviewers are not in sync with how the general reader comprehends them. Perhaps, by the Cinescape frame of reference, most movies do merrit a B minus through B plus. However, it is clear that the (comment board sample of) readers do not agree with that system.
I like a system along the lines of a "Recommended way to see this movie". Kind of a: 1. Pay full admission; 2. See in a theatre, but wait for a matinee or cheap Tuesday; 3. Wait for the DVD; 4. If its on TV take a look; 5. Avoid.
Or something different anyway.
Just an opinion.
goodwibr

• Jul 12, 2006, 10:15am •
goodwibr,
That's a terrific idea for a ratings system. I've pretty much stopped paying attention to the current ratings system, mostly because everything seems to rate in the Bees. If The Brown Bunny was reviewed here, it'd probably get a B- (probably just for the "head shot").

• Jul 12, 2006, 10:36am •
Pretty good idea for a rating system goodwibr. I'd give it a B.

• Jul 12, 2006, 11:37am •
I've been using that same rating system for awhile now on the Cinescape message boards. So, after seeing "A Scanner Darkly", I gave this movie a video rental rating. Why?

Only half the movie works, and it only works when Linklater sticks to the story rather than letting Downey Jr. and Cochrane off their leashes to riff about drugs. The first half of the movie is like talking to stoned people while you're completely sober. Amusing at times, but all together painfully boring.

It's not until the meat of the story in the second half, and the end (when all the pieces come together) do you get the enormity of how good the story could have been in the hands of a director that has some sense of restraint. Also, the animation was completely unnecessary (and I'm in animation) to the story.

Interesting, but more of an experimental film than anything else.


• Jul 12, 2006, 02:48pm •
that's funny (in a coincidental way) how goodwibr suggest the ratings because that's how I do it with people I talk with, I don't give them grades, I just give them one of the choices from above... I think it's an easier way to judge a movie (money talks more than letter grades).

• Jul 13, 2006, 06:02pm •
I'll be interested to see this, mainly because it's Philip K Dick (not that film adaptations of his stories are always good) and there isn't much interesting sci-fi coming out these days - although based on this review I don't know if this film will qualify as "interesting sci-fi". But that said, as with bryanway I think "Waking Life" was highly over-rated - whole bunch of pop-philosophy mixed in with the stuff of late night stoner conversations ("Like what if when you're awake you're actually dreaming, and when you're dreaming you're actually awake!" "Dude!") - entertaining, but hardly new or profound. Although it did spark a far more interesting philosophical discussion between my friends and I while we were watching it, and I guess that's not a bad thing for a film to achieve.

coldhardtruth • Jul 14, 2006, 02:33am •
Hopefully this one is better than Waking Life...

• Jul 14, 2006, 04:44am •
I`ve always liked Linklater, if nothing else because after watching the majority of his movies, you find yourself thinking "WTF?" and then having long ass conversations about it with your friends. Slacker, definitely did that. I also really enjoyed Dazed and Confused, Suburbia, School of Rock and the Newton Boys. I`ll definitely see this movie, not really expecting all that much, but again leaving the theater thinking, "wtf?"
I also don't really like the Cinescape rating system, but then I take a step back and remember that I don't really care because I never listen to what reviewers have to say, as far as if I`m going to see it or not.

1
Login to post a comment!