THE SEEKER: THE DARK IS RISING - Mania.com



Movie Review

Mania Grade: B-

7 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

  • Reviewed Format: Theatrical Release
  • Rated: PG
  • Stars: Alexander Ludwig, Ian McShane, Frances Conroy, Christopher Eccleston
  • Writer: John Hodge, based on the novel by Susan Cooper
  • Director: David L. Cunningham
  • Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox/Walden Media

THE SEEKER: THE DARK IS RISING

Looks good, doesn’t feel fulfilling...

By Rachel Reitsleff     October 07, 2007


Alexander Ludwig in THE SEEKER: THE DARK IS RISING (2007).
© Fox Walden
The Seeker: The Dark is Rising, adapted from the second in Susan Cooper’s award-winning fantasy book series, looks as though what it’s really seeking is to replicate the success of other normal-to-start-with-boy-has-magical-adventures-in-England films (you may fill in the multiple titles yourself). However, Seeker starts out by changing its young hero, Will Stanton (Alexander Ludwig), from British to American, then has to go through a few narrative convulsions to explain what he and his parents and large group of siblings are all doing in a small English village. This unnecessary nod to commercial non-wisdom does not bode well for later narrative decisions.
 
After a supernatural incident the local mall scares the heck out of Will (and us) in one of Seeker’s most effective sequences, the 14-year-old soon learns that he is “the last of the Old Ones,” a group whose members are sworn to defend the Light against the Dark, personified here by the Rider (Christopher Eccleston). As the Seeker, Will has five days to search out six “signs,” magical objects that will empower him in the battle, before Dark reaches its zenith and literally covers the world. Will finds that he is able to travel back and forth through time in his quest, though for reasons that aren’t explained in the movie, the signs are fortunately never far away in place. Meanwhile, the Dark is making incursions by creating some Biblically bad weather, and Will frets over the clue about the final sign.
 
John Hodge of Trainspotting is credited with the script adaptation, which must make so many concessions for exposition that there seems little room for the wit he has displayed elsewhere. Director David L. Cunningham elevates Seeker somewhat by creating consistently magical visuals, and young Ludwig is very game, but the final cut of the film has the look of something that doesn’t really express any single vision. There are emotional goalposts hammered in along the way, but there seems no comprehension of the fact that these effects need to be earned; they won’t evoke a Pavlovian response just because they’re there.
 
Ian McShane has authority but plays his Old One as resigned and worried rather than ardent about the impending conflict, which makes for a rather peculiar dynamic as Will is receiving his marching orders. On the other hand, Eccleston dives in with relish to his personification of malice – he’s a blast in his way.
 
There is what looks like a conscious attempt to inject specifically Christian themes into Seeker, which fall short as parable because, again, the movie doesn’t do the set-up right. Despite time spent with Will’s family, we don’t get a sense of how Will’s upbringing has shaped him to help or hinder with his Seeker destiny, he comes to his choices easily, and there’s not a lot of detective work involved in him finding the signs (we guess where the last one is long before the characters do). In fairness, it looks as though large portions of the film may be on a cutting-room floor (or, these days, locked in an Avid) and perhaps an extended version would be much more effective and affecting. What we get has moments that are stunning to see but emotionally bland.

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 7 of 7
1 
metalwater 10/7/2007 3:43:30 AM
This movie really bombed at the box office. I guess that's what happens when you play with the title and other central aspects of a beloved book series, just so you can turn into a movie. There are some reall fools running Hollywood these days.
TayDor 10/7/2007 4:57:49 AM
For once I agree with you, metal. I love this particular book. But just from what I've heard of the book and seen in the trailers...uuuugh.
laforcer69@yahoo.com_home 10/7/2007 6:17:27 AM
I completely disagree...People who go to movies these days are just your typical movie goers who have not read the books, sure there are those that have read these books but they are a small number compared to those that have not...I think the marketing campaign of this movie is what will be the eventual death of it...I have not read the books but what I have seen in advertising and trailers has done nothing for me, of course there has been very little advertising of this movie and has not built a wave of excitement...So in my opinion the advertising campaign is to blame, not the title or central aspects of this book...
Miner49er 10/7/2007 6:59:06 AM
I was looking forward to this movie when it was first announced as I've read the books, but when I saw the trailer, I thought, what the hell did they do to it? This may be the first one that Walden Media botched.
snallygaster 10/7/2007 10:00:56 AM
I'm assuming that they've been targeting the kid/tween demographics in their marketing, because quite honestly I haven't seen a single trailer for this movie anywhere. The only indication of its existance to me was a large standee display at the local cineplex. It also appears to have not been made available for review which is not always an indication that a movie is pure crap, but certainly raises some alarms. Despite all that, I'm going to see it this afternoon. Admittedly I have not read the book (nor even heard of it until now) so I'll have to judge the movie on its own merits, not on how faithful of an adaptation it is.
ckshark 10/8/2007 11:24:23 AM
Ummm... I didn't even know this movie was out. Like many have said before, very little (none, from what I saw) advertising is most likely what killed this movie. I read the book as a kid and remember enjoying it, but don't remember the details (must be age). Was kinda looking forward to how they adapted this to film, but now I'm not so sure.
Xenophobe 10/8/2007 9:23:30 PM
Maybe if they had used an actor that didn't look like a cross dressing girl it would appeal more to people.
1 

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

MORE CONTENT BY RACHEL REITSLEFF

POPULAR TOPICS