TV Editorial


Small Screen, Big Screen: Star Trek

By: STEPHEN LACKEY
Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Hollywood is a pretty lazy town.  Rather than seek out new and innovative stories to tell they’d usually rather just make a quick buck bringing old television series to the big screen.  Some recent examples include STARSKY AND HUTCH, THE DUKES OF HAZARD, and CHARLIE’S ANGELS.  Pretty consistently these movies have all sucked, but they turned a profit, and that’s all that matters to Hollywood in the end.  Many critics are barking about this situation like it’s a new problem, bit it really isn’t.  It may be more prevalent now than it has in a while, but TV shows have made the move to the big screen for many years.  Perhaps the most notable series to make the move to the big screen is STAR TREKSTAR TREK represents the best and worst of what can happen to a television series making the move to the big screen.  STAR TREK 2, 4, and 6 are classic sci-fi films and tell stories as strong, or stronger than any that were told on any of the STAR TREK television series.  Recent films in the franchise have been failures with NEMESIS being the worst, and the one responsible for nearly putting the franchise in a coffin.  But, Paramount needs some cash, so the franchise is being re-launched with a new cast, new writers, and new producers.  With that in mind STAR TREK seemed like the best place to start with this new series where we will discuss all we know about a film being made from old television series and make predictions about its success or failure. 


It’s been all over the news for sometime that writer/producer J.J. Abrams will be taking the reins on the new film in the franchise and that he’s being given more control over the story than any producer has in years.  Not that having more control would have helped the last film, look at ENTERPRISE, Brannon and Braga were given plenty of rope in that series and they hung themselves and the fans.  Abrams got the gig based on his last film for Paramount MISSION IMPOSSIBLE III.  Obviously it wasn’t based on the box office success of the film because while it made money, it wasn’t the tent pole that the studio had hoped for.  He got the gig based on the fact that the movie was good and that Abrams did a great job producing the film as well as directing it.  I think that film was a failure because Cruise has shown himself for what he is; a total nutcase.  MISSION IMPOSSIBLE III was easily as good as the first film in the series. 

Film may be the perfect medium for Abrams, who seems to get tired of television projects too quickly.  His method is to work hard to start a new series, make it some of the best TV on TV, and then leave it wither in the wind while he starts something new.  This happened with ALIAS and it seems to be happening now with LOST.  With a movie, or even a movie franchise he gets to make the movie and go on to other things, maybe returning years later if it’s a successful franchise.  Before LOST and ALIAS Abrams had a successful run as a writer on the television series FELICITY and he wrote screenplays or the story for ARMAGEDDONFOREVER YOUNG, and REGARDING HENRY.  So, as good as LOST and ALIAS were he isn’t infallible.  I feel like Abrams was honing his skills on those less than stellar films to bring him to where he is today.  Abrams seems to be better suited to writing and directing action or sci-fi because his latest endeavor, SIX DEGREES a new television series was not a success.  Even with his failures I have become an unabashed Abrams fan.  I loved the early seasons of ALIAS and of course the first two seasons of LOST were fantastic.  After ALIAS I decided I’d give anything he did, that was some sort of action/sci-fi thing anyway, a chance.  That’s how I originally discovered LOST and that’s why I actually went to the theater to see MISSION IMPOSSIBLE III and I wasn’t disappointed. 

Abrams has brought along two old friends to help write and produce the film; Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci.  As a producer Kurtzman was involved with XENA: WARRIOR PRINCESS, JACK OF ALL TRADES, and finally ALIAS.  So, no producing experience on major motion pictures but he has written for some.  Kurtzman penned the story and screenplay for the upcoming Michael Bay summer blockbuster TRANSFORMERS.  It’s too soon to tell if this film will actually be good or not but you can expect it too look really cool, and possibly be a bit shallow based on the Director’s track record.  Kurtzman also wrote MISSION IMPOSSIBLE III, the screenplay for THE LEGEND OF ZORRO, and THE ISLAND for the big screen.  Well, at least one of these films is good.  His track record, on the surface, concerns me.  There’s not a lot of really great filmmaking going on here.  THE ISLAND started off quite good before devolving into a Michael Bay typical blast fest.  I can’t comment on THE LEGEND OF ZORRO as I haven’t seen that one.  Based on what he’s done for film and TV it does seem that he can give a director what he wants though.  He and Abrams have a great working relationship too.  STAR TREK should feature some great space sequences but it’s not a twisty action film as ALIAS was on TV, so can he bring us something new to a genre he has previously failed at?  I do have more confidence in Abrams than Bay as far as being able to pick a script and spend time working with Kurtzman to make it good rather than just taking whatever Kurtzman writes and figuring out how many sepia tones and booms he can work in.  Roberto Orci has virtually the same credits as Kurtzman with again the bright spots being ALIAS and MISSION IMPOSSIBLE III. 

The executive producers working with Abrams are again people he’s worked with before either on LOST or ALIAS.  Stratton Leopold is a producer that Abrams worked with for the first time on MISSION IMPOSSIBLE III.  He has produced a number of big budget films such as PAYCHECK, THE SUM OF ALL FEARS, and BLESS THIS CHILD.  Looking at his career so far on IMDB won’t get you excited though, everything is pretty bad to mediocre. 

Some of the old crew is still in place for this film, and for the most part that’s a good thing.  I think had I seen the names Brannon or Braga I might have lost it, but happily they are long gone.  Jerry Goldsmith however is doing the music for this film as he has done since the very first film.  Herman Zimmerman is back on production design.  He’s been doing this job for STAR TREK since the NEXT GENERATION TV series.  I’m sure he’ll be bringing along the same crew that he used for previous films in the franchise too.  While the series definitely needs revitalizing and re-inventing, as a fan of some of the previous series and films, the familiarity in score and art design is comforting. 

There’s almost no real information out there about the story for the film.  There’s a pretty significant rumor that Abrams and crew are keen to revamp and reboot the franchise by starting with a new Captain Kirk.  Many fans and critics believed that the rumor of Matt Damon taking the part was a done deal but it’s not.  Damon recently said that he was interested and is looking forward to reading the script. So, the only thing we know to be true regarding the story is that Matt Damon wants to read the script, well so do we.  In a recent financial statement Paramount released to investors, they say that the film is scheduled for release in 2009.  Earlier reports stated that the studio had planned a summer ’08 release.  We haven’t heard that the production is already behind so it’s a little odd that the release date has been pushed so far up, especially since Abrams doesn’t have anything else on his plate at least as far as feature films anyway. 

The Prediction 

Sadly, the only person I have faith in at this point is Abrams himself, but the fact that he has enough faith in the team he has built gives me hope.  It’s been proven that he can get great things from these people even if when they work separate from him they seem to only be capable at mediocrity or total badness such as PAY CHECK.  Also, with the release of the last STAR TREK film and TV series I don’t see how the franchise could do any worse.  I have faith that Abrams will wrangle this crew into doing something that at least gives the franchise a positive reboot.  As he goes into the process of finalizing the writing and production of this film I hope he looks to Bryan Singer’s SUPERMAN RETURNS as an example of how horribly things can go if you worry to much about owing to what came before and not striving to do something completely new.


More Content By STEPHEN LACKEY
HEROES: I Am Become Death
(Saturday, October 11, 2008)
PRISON BREAK: Five the Hard Way
(Friday, October 10, 2008)
TERMINATOR: THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES: Goodbye to All That
(Wednesday, October 8, 2008)
TV Wasteland: Red Mars is Coming to AMC
(Monday, October 6, 2008)
TV Feature Interview: Ghost Hunters
(Saturday, October 4, 2008)
TV Feature Interview: Scare Tactics
(Saturday, October 4, 2008)
HEROES: One of Us, One of Them
(Thursday, October 2, 2008)
SANCTUARY: Sanctuary for All
(Thursday, October 2, 2008)
TERMINATOR: THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES: Allison from Palmdale
(Wednesday, October 1, 2008)
TV Feature Interview: Josh Gates Talks Destination Truth
(Wednesday, October 1, 2008)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1 2 3 > >>
mprager • Dec 19, 2006, 12:56am •
Hey there.
>Jerry Goldsmith however is doing the music for this film as he has done since the very first film.
Don't think so. He passed away last year. Maybe Joel Goldsmith would be a good candidate, but I'd rather hear someone take a more modern stab at the whole Trek theme.
As for the whole prequel idea, seems a bit silly, but I have a little faith that J.J. Abrams will pull it off.

sportwarrior • Dec 19, 2006, 02:23am •
I was gonna comment on the Goldsmith thing, but it looks like you got there first...

I will say though, that while Nemesis was a financial disaster, Insurrection was by far the worst of the newer Treks. I also thought that First Contact was by far the best of the recent additions.

I'm not sure which direction will be a winner for the franchise, but Abrams isn't the first to think a reboot is the right way to go. J. Michael Straczynski also proposed the idea a few years ago (although the concept was a little different).

michaelxaviermaelstrom • Dec 19, 2006, 05:17am •

I was going to complain "2009?! WTF Mutherfu@#$@s!"

(spoken in an erudite British accent while drinking Earl Grey tea through his nose of course -Ed)

Piss off Ed.

but then I realized that response would _only_ be because my expectations had been set (by recent rumours) to a 2008 release.

yet in fact, when I think about it, how could it be anything _BUT_ 2009 at the earliest?

Even that's a little tight, considering they haven't started pre-production as yet and we're into the last few weeks of 2006.

ie. Nominally from Pre-production to Post-production good movies typically take 2 years to make.

Anything less than that is rushing it, and bobbly (I think he means frankly - Ed) I'd rather they not rush this Star Trek, as it will very probably be the film that decides whether Trek re-launches or is sent packing into mothballs.

Take your time and do it right Abrams and co.


thelastonelives • Dec 19, 2006, 07:52am •
Pack it in now.

wessmith1966 • Dec 19, 2006, 08:15am •
For this movie to be successful, Abrams is going to have to not only draw in the Trek fanbase, which has been steadily eroding, but also NEW fans. I'm not crazy about rebooting the series, but I think it's the only way to take Trek to the top again. I have faith that Abrams will be faithful to the spirit of Trek, but add enough to make it interesting to a larger fan base. Star Trek used to be one of only a couple of scifi properties in the entertainment world, but Star Trek isn't unique any more. Use the mythology already created in the reboot and I think you've got the start of something good. Damon isn't the answer for kirk; he's about the same age as Shatner was back in the beginning. Get young (and cheap) actors and tie them in to three picture deals.

slackey • Dec 19, 2006, 10:09am •
OK, you guys are right about Jerry Goldsmith, but he's still listed as doing the music on the last press release I got and on IMDB. So, I don't know what they'll do for a score. Getting young people to reboot the series? NOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!! We don't need another once great franchise rebooted into a Dawson's Creek on film. There was talk of doing a young Kirk at Starfleet Academy that gave me nightmares. The fanbase for this franchise is too old to see a bunch of kids in the roles with popular music and MTV cuts. For it to succeed they have to take a fresh modern approach but not alienate the current fans. A good example is the last Bond flick. While I think the script still needed work what they did right was bring in Daniel Craig and give the series modern sensibilities but still keeping what made Bond great. This is the kind of thing that will save Star trek.

PMCarhart • Dec 19, 2006, 12:03pm •
Stephen, come on. You're the one writing the article. You're the one positioned as the expert. It's one thing to be wrong on the Goldsmith count. He's listed, after all, despite his death. But your mentioning, twice, of the names "Brannon and Braga" is pretty much lazy. The first time I came across it, I shrugged, figuring you'd sorta spat it out. Everyone's allowed a typo here and there. But then I came across it again. For the record: "Brannon and Braga" are the same guy. His name is Brannon Braga. The other guy you're probably thinking of is Rick Berman. Rick Berman, as even the manliest of fanboys knows, was the guy who inherrited the Star Trek universe when Roddenberry died by virtue of being Roddenberry's glorified gopher on TNG at the time. It's Rick Berman and Brannon Braga, whose names are often spoken together as "Berman and Braga." Come on, man. When you write an article like this, you're supposed to be the expert.

wessmith1966 • Dec 19, 2006, 12:10pm •
slackey, Bond has changed many times over the years. The Star Trek characters have always been the same. You put a new Trek movie out with the same actors in the same situations, you'll get the same less-than-stellar results. Just because you do a reboot doesn't mean you have to have Dawson's Creek in space. I really doubt that would appeal to Abrams anyway. Don't want to go back? Then go forward in time a number of years with a new ship, new allies and new enemies. Go forward maybe 50 years and have cameos by current Trek alumni. I always thought that the episode "Conspiracy" would make a great movie. At the end of that episode, the little alien invaders sent a message out. 50 years from the time of the last Star Trek movie there's a new crew onboard a new Enterprise and there are new political dynamics in the Federation. An old, retired Will Riker (or any Star Trek TNG crewmember) notices changes in Star Fleet, and after investigating, realizes the little alien critters are back in a big way for a full blown invasion this time. Riker convinces the captain of the Enterprise (who may be a family member or related to an old crew member) to investigate and battle the horde (that could be their name The Hoard). Along the way, some Star Trek actors known to all of us could have bit roles. That would bridge the generation gap for the viewers. I'd like to see that movie; it would nod its hat to the crews of the past and still move the franchise ahead. By moving years into the future, it would give Abrams production and design teams the ability to recreate the Trek universe, while still keeping it similar enough to draw in current fans. Get young actors to star in the movie to draw in a new audience. Maybe Paul Walker for the new captain (that name just came out of nowhere; I'm sure there are better actors). Or get Matt Damon and just don't make him a new Kirk, but pattern him after Kirk. Make Kirk his idol or something. Sorry, rambling now...

HudsonTaco • Dec 19, 2006, 12:19pm •
Kirk and Spock at the academy? Come on! I don't want to even get into whats wrong with that concept. Iconic characters like that cannot be recast, Shatner is Kirk, Nemoy is Spock that is that. Enterprise was not nearly as bad as some would have you beleive and its final season with the exception of maybe the series finally was one of Treks best sesons ever. There are so many more satisfying ideas they could do. What about Enterprise B? how about a movie about the doomed Enterprise C? oh and btw Kirk and Spock never met at the academy but continuity has never really been a problem for the writers of trek as they have changed so much even during the original series so I can see them not caring too much about that. If they must use Kirk and Spock then reimagine the universe, a la Battlestar Galactica, now thats how you relaunch a series. TNG is in my opinion the best show ever on TV but the new Battlestar is a %$#@ close second. I wonder what Gene would have to say about the state of trek these days. Spinning in his grave. While I will keep my eye on how this develops as all good Trekkies should they have promised too much before and not delivered. Inssurection(worse than ST:V) and Nemesis (was missing something I still can't put my finger on it). Abrams has his work cut out for him, I hope he delivers as good a movie a MI:3 (fingers crossed).

P.S Wesssmith's "conspiracy" is a fricken great Idea just thought Id add that.

amateurscientist • Dec 19, 2006, 12:22pm •
THANK YOU, "sportwarrior", cause that's just what I was thinking --- the thing about the J. Michael Straczynski (& Bryce Zabel) Star Trek Reboot that they pitched to the studio.

Zabel posted the actual studio pitch and treatment on his blog and it's... fantastic.

of course, that pitch was for a show, and entwined in it was mystery and many other turns that would unfold over the course of a year and several seasons. for a star trek fan, I thought it was just the right way to go.

perhaps, like with the Spider-Man film (where James Cameron lent his talents and put together a killer script/treatment that the studio and many of the people involved with the picture, used as a guideline to making the film) Abrams and gang should model their Star Trek movie after the Zabel/Straczynski pitch.

of course their could be legal problems with that... and we don't want egos brused... but I think that Abrams take on that pitch might be the right way to reignite interest in the franchise beyond that whole "hey, that guy's playing young Shatner..."

we'll see. (check out the pitch though, cause it's pretty good.)

1 2 3 > >>
Login to post a comment!