Star Trek Into Darkness Official Synopsis Comments - Mania.com



COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 11 - 20 of 96
<<  <  1 2 3 4 5 >  >>  
monkeyfoot 11/27/2012 6:57:22 AM

I agree with Goldeneyez. If this is using a scenario and character from TOS Gary Mitchell wold be the one. You could say it has a similarity to Skyfall.

karas1 11/27/2012 7:38:07 AM

I'm speechless.  That just sounds so... dumb.  "An unstoppable force of terror"?  Really?

Besides, didn't they destroy the whole fleet in the last movie?  I'm feeling a destinct lack of creativity.

violator14 11/27/2012 8:19:39 AM

 karas- It won't sound so dumb once they reveal that the "unstoppable force of terror" is the Tazmanian Devil!!!! duhn duhn DUHN!!!!

dojen1 11/27/2012 9:28:52 AM

Articles on this very website have stated the character is Lt. Gary Mitchell. He was given god-like powers in the second ST pilot, "Where No Man Has Gone Before".  Alice Eve will likely be either Elizabeth Dehner, or perhaps Carol Marcus.

As for the hate for the last ST film...my only complaint was the use of a brewery to film scenes in "engineering". It looked cheap and slap-dash. Hard to believe all that low-tech would be in the guts of a faster-than-light starship. Let's hope Abrams has a better set budget for the next one.

redvector 11/27/2012 10:01:27 AM

That synopsis sounds like it's a mash up of different episodes and characters from the original series. Lt. Gary Mitchell got his powers in the original series episode from exposure to an alien energy source. In the movie I believe he could have gotten them from genetic enhancements. Maybe as some kind of  covert Starfeet super soldier program using modified techniques left over from the Eugenics Wars. Mashing together Gary Mitchell with Khan.

wish 11/27/2012 10:54:37 AM

Its gonna be awesome, a great film, just like the first one!  JJ is a great director, all the actors are aweome and this franchise finally has that fresh and exciting feeling back in it!  Thank Q that we didnt' get someone who thinks like the small group of people who openly voice thier dislike for the new Trek to be involved in the reboot, or else we would have surely ended up with another crappy, lame and out-of-touch story in a franchise that died a long and slow death before Mr. Abrams came along.

lazarus 11/27/2012 11:30:14 AM

I think it will be the revenge of Harry Mudd. Why not? Harry introduces a new for of pleasure drug which consumes the entire Starfleet in an orgy of sex and decadence. Kirk decides to videotape the entire thing for You Tube.

booker9172 11/27/2012 12:17:13 PM

It's Star Trek II: The Wrath of Finnegan.

monkeyfoot 11/27/2012 12:25:24 PM

An "unstoppable force of terror"? One that could detonate the whole fleet and leave the world in crisis? This could only be one thing: tribbles!!!

The war-torn world could be Sherman's Planet, the one the Federation and the Klingon Empire were in dispute over in that classic episode.

There, I solved it!

Higgy 11/27/2012 12:45:36 PM

You "wish"...uh...Wish...

Ahem...yeah I dunno about this one.  JJ is on and off for me with his directing.  He leaves too much up to the imagination sometimes...aka...plot holes.  His ST movie just didn't make sense.  His Kirk was barely in Starfleet, he was thrown into being a Captain from...I dunno...was he even an Ensign at that point?  The Nero storyline had too many plotholes...and how he knew where and when Spoke would show up...and his ships power just happened to last 25 years without having to recharge them?  Yeah...like I said...too many plotholes.  And where did this love between Spoke and Uhuru come from that was never there in the first story line.  It's always been Uhuru and Scotty that's had the relationship.  Too many things didn't make sense.  It just seemed too thrown together to me and not thought through at all.

<<  <  1 2 3 4 5 >  >>  

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.