Star Trek Into Darkness Trailer Comments -


Showing items 91 - 100 of 137
<<  <  7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >  >>  
jmw2814 12/7/2012 8:26:59 AM

I think some of you are forgetting that Kahn also wore a starfleet uniform for about half of the original episode. So just going by the villain wearing a starfleet uniform doesnt really count.

Either way I think this teaser looks awesome. I vote for Mitchel.

makabriel 12/7/2012 9:24:08 AM

There is such thing as plausibility within the confines of the movie itself.  I'm sure people would be up in arms if Kirk threw fireballs from his hands and you said "Oh, it's a Sci-Fi move, Startships, aliens, yadda yadda.." people would flame you.

My friends and I haev thrown out the possibilities of inertial dampeners, anti-grav and the like, but it's a stretch.  The NG Enterprise Saucer crashed down planetside in Generations and didn't fare so well.


monkeyfoot 12/7/2012 9:28:10 AM

Kirk can't throw fireballs! Everybody knows his power is radiating a Super Sexytime Mojo Aura to all creatures of the opposite sex.

makabriel 12/7/2012 9:32:18 AM

And see, that's extremely plausible.  Everyone -knows- Kirk has a super phermone emitter..


Bryzarro 12/7/2012 9:55:13 AM

 That I believe!!

Higgy 12/7/2012 10:05:54 AM

Wish, I'm not criticizing the trailer.  All I said was that it's a lot of bells and whistles so far so it's not exciting me that much.  Hell this could have been a Michael Bay trailer and I wouldn't have known the difference.  I'm hoping the next movie is going to be better then the first.  That's not hating on anything except the previous film.  I want this to be better because I like Star Trek.  A big part of Star Trek is the plot and story to me, so I'm hoping that is good.  Anyone can throw CGI around in a trailer and make something look good.  I mean, look at the Star Wars prequels...great CGI, crappy story.  In any case, my overall hope for this movie is that I hope it's good.  And I wasn't asking you to stop talking about this, I was saying stop belittling others.  If you have to do that to make a point you just lost the argument.

Bryzarro you obviously missed my point and didn't understand my post.  I never said anything about expecting to see story in the's a teaser...they barely ever show any part of the story in a teaser.  I'm saying that I'm not getting that excited over just one teaser because I don't know what the story is about.  And regarding the flying, shooting eye beams and pooping golden eggs...I said IF IT WAS IN STAR TREK IT WOULDN'T MAKE ANY SENSE...  Try to keep up man.

wish 12/7/2012 11:38:38 AM

I totally agree with you on pretty much everything you just said.  It looks like we all just want this to be a good movie, and yes I believe that when one side gets to the point where they resort to name calling, it's a clear sign they've lost the arguement, in this case I don't feel I've done that at all, I believe I made a strong point using an analogy, no belittling or insult was intended. 

wish 12/7/2012 11:43:07 AM

And as far as I'm concerned, when SarcasticCaveman gives you the thumbs up, you just won the argument.


haha, we got to remember to keep it light and fun around's just entertainment......

jedibanner 12/7/2012 11:54:18 AM

there is the existing fear that if they keep bringing old characters from the TV show or past movies, then there is not really a need for new movies IMO.

I'd rather like a story with a new crazy villain in this new ST universe then a rehash of the old characters already done.

Now let's all hold hand and sing kumbaya in peace Maniacs.............nahhhh, it's more fune to argue, just saying...

InnerSanctum 12/7/2012 12:15:59 PM

 All I ask is that it maintains this serious tone.  I was not a fan of the comedic aspects of the last film.  Those intentioinal and unintentional.  

<<  <  7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >  >>  


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.