Movie Review


STARDUST

By: Rachel Reitsleff
Review Date: Friday, August 10, 2007

Neil Gaiman’s 1999 novel Stardust was a charming piece of fantasy fiction, told with just the right amount of contemporary humor sprinkled over a once-upon-a-time tale about a young lad from 19th-century England who journeys to an enchanted realm for one purpose and finds himself embarked on a quest with a surprising outcome.
 
In Victorian England, eighteen-year-old Tristan Thorn (Charlie Cox) learns from his father (Nathaniel Parker) that Tristan’s mother isn’t dead after all, but rather hails from the mystical land separated from Tristan’s village by a wall that nobody crosses (except for his father, once, eighteen years ago). Tristan sets out not, primarily, to seek his mother but rather to obtain a fallen star as a gift for the object of his affections (Sienna Miller). However, the star turns out not to be a big celestial rock, but rather a young woman called Yvaine (Claire Danes), who knows of human ways after watching Earth from the sky for centuries, but is still bitterly unhappy about being stuck down here. She’s not wild about the notion of being presented, however briefly, to Tristan’s lady friend. However, there also actual danger afoot – the witch Lamia (Michelle Pfeiffer) wants to devour the star’s heart to restore her youth and power and some fratricidal princes seek the jewel Yvaine innocently carries.
 
Director Matthew Vaughn and his co-screenwriter Jane Goldman is largely true to both the spirit and the letter of Gaiman’s novel (Gaiman, one of the film’s producers, presumably had some input in keeping it that way). There is a good deal of puckishness that’s never overdone, even when Tristan and Yvaine encounter a pirate captain with a surprising agenda, played with unexpected sweetness by Robert De Niro. The magical world looks truly magical and intriguing, even though some of the CGI looks more like it was whipped up by a computer than by sorcery. A lot of the imagery is just delightful, though, with references to the illustrations Charles Vess did for the novel, as well as elements of films by Neil Jordan and Terry Gilliam.
 
Cox is exactly what we want a young but empathetic storybook hero to be, modest, capable, entertaining and highly watchable. Danes is appealing – the effects let her literally glow when her character is happy – and Pfeiffer gleefully deploys her inner witch here even better than in Hairspray. The cast also benefits from appearances by Ricky Gervais, Peter O’Toole and Rupert Everett, among many other fine actors. Ian McKellen provides the eminently suitable narration.
 
Stardust has a few draggy bits, but the story fits together beautifully, with a little added epilogue that glows. It’s a really engaging once-upon-a-time cinematic experience.


More Content By Rachel Reitsleff
88 Minutes
(Friday, April 18, 2008)
ALIENS VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM
(Wednesday, December 26, 2007)
HITMAN
(Saturday, November 24, 2007)
SLEUTH
(Friday, October 12, 2007)
THE SEEKER: THE DARK IS RISING
(Sunday, October 7, 2007)
HATCHET
(Friday, September 7, 2007)
RUSH HOUR 3
(Friday, August 10, 2007)
STARDUST
(Friday, August 10, 2007)
THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM
(Friday, August 3, 2007)
SUNSHINE
(Friday, July 20, 2007)
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
raulendymion • Aug 10, 2007, 07:13am •
Probably turn out to be a good movie but I'm not feeling the heat or the hype. Having not read the novel the concept is not real obvious and the title does little to attract potential viewers IMHO. That being said I hope it does make a few bucks so more Gaiman projects get the green light to the big screen.

snallygaster • Aug 10, 2007, 01:39pm •
There hasn't been a lot of hype, but based on the ads, I think they're targeting fans of "The Princess Bride" - it has that sort of vibe to it. The theater chains don't seem to be getting behind it though - I checked my local listings, and Rush Hour has four times as many show times as Stardust.

Jakester • Aug 10, 2007, 02:41pm •
I love the book. Hell, I love Gaiman's work, so an adaptation of one of his novels that he's behind is enough for me to plunk down my money. Hell, the trailer for Beowulf didn't inspire me, but the fact that it's a Gaiman screenplay means I'll see it. Add to that a great cast, and I'm happily there.

galaga51 • Aug 10, 2007, 04:25pm •
Agreed - It seems difficult for fantasy to do well in theaters without an overwhelming support prior to the film's release (e.g., LotR, HP). Plus, I don't recall any breathtaking shots in the previews (action or otherwise), the basic plot alone isn't very engaging, and for me, I'm not really interested in any of the main stars. The best things this movie has going for it are 1. It's freakin' hot outside. 2. Other openers aren't reviewing so great.

snallygaster • Aug 10, 2007, 04:36pm •
Yes, Rush Hour 3 is only getting an 18% positive rating over at Rottentomatoes - but on the other hand, Rush Hour is "review-proof," and will probably open big regardless.

muchdrama • Aug 10, 2007, 04:52pm •
Stardust does absolutely nothing for me...I have no desire to see it whatsoever.

As for Rush Hour...Roger Ebert says it's got just what fans of RH 1 and 2 like. So I'm there.

jon41380 • Aug 10, 2007, 04:58pm •
Wow, Matthew Vaughn and Neil Gaiman. That's enough talent to persuade me to see it. Ricky Gervais, Robert Deniro is just icing on the cake. I'm about to go see it, I'll probably catch Rush Hour 3 when it is out on DVD, although I like Chan, I'm not sure if I want to pay for the same jokes we've gotten in the previous movies.

gauleyboy420 • Aug 10, 2007, 06:22pm •
I want to see this it looks cool, now for the real reason I'm here
Whoever came up with the expanding window advertisements n this site sucks a dick!
I can't stand it!I cant even fucking cruise this site with out some goddamn ad I dont care about popping up!
If I was Fucking interested in Flash Gordon(which I was before this annoying, and invasive advertising) I would click on the ad. The same goes for that fucking stupid Who wants to be a superhero! I don't want my computer to slow down because the tip of my mouse gets to close to a freakin ad!
MANIA STOP THESE ADS!
now this is how I feel if any other site users feel this way please let Mania know it. I gotta feeling this won't work which will prove my point to all of you who hate when I say you can't change executives decisions by complaining.

earlew • Aug 10, 2007, 08:07pm •
Gauleyboy, I feel your pain too. I don't think those ads will go away. Be careful. I do. And you might want to try a firewall of sorts that prevents animated ads like that. Could help.

But yeah, those do suck when you accidentally hit them.

almostunbiased • Aug 10, 2007, 09:35pm •
I saw Rush Hour 3 and then Star Dust an hour later. Star Dust was fun. I enjoyed it. Not a great movie like LOTR or even a classic like The Princess Bride, but it has some great stuff and made me laugh a few times too. Not great, but good.

As for RH3, I thought it was also fun, but it's getting to be the same thing over and over again.

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!