DVD Review


STARDUST

By: Robert T. Trate
Review Date: Monday, December 17, 2007

Tristan (Charlie Cox) attempts to win the affection of the town beauty, Victoria (Sienna Miller), by promising to bring back the star to her that they both just watched fall to Earth.  Tristan must cross over the forbidden wall and into unknown to bring back the star and win his lady.
 
‘Stardust’ came and went at the box office with little fireworks.  Perhaps it was the Don LaFontaine’s type voice over reading the single word reviews (“Magical!”) to us on TV that made us feel that we had been there, done that, before.  Perhaps the movie going public had its fill of magical adventures last summer with a new Potter book and film.  Maybe the movie going public needs a film to have been something they have seen before for them to take a chance on it.  A paradox, true, but with all the sequels, threequels, sagas (meaning there are now four or more), and movie versions of TV shows, I don't think that I am far off in assuming that most people had no clue what ‘Stardust’ was about. To them, it wasn't one to see last summer.
 
It’s a shame because many people missed out on an original, fun and tie-in free film.  There were no toys for ‘Stardust’, no fast food chains for ‘Stardust’ and certainly not a pre-established fan base for ‘Stardust’ either.  There was a novel by comic book legend Neil Gaiman, but I am sure ‘Stardust’ isn't on every book shelf in America, like the book about “the boy who lived” is.  This, to me, is what made ‘Stardust’ so appealing.  It was fresh and new.  I wasn't comparing it to the previous one, or the TV show, and certainly not to the book (I never even heard about it, though I do know who Neil Gaiman is).
 
This story is fantasy fun, very much in the realm of Ron Howard’s ‘Willow’ and Ridley Scott’s ‘Legend’. ‘Stardust’ is a story about a young man’s journey to become the man he has always wanted to be.  Charlie Cox as Tristan is both naïve and awkward and fits the role perfectly.  His chemistry with Claire Danes, who is the “star” in human form, is perfect.  On a whole you could not see the two of them pulling off a major box office release together, which, perhaps, is another reason why no one went to see the film, but here in the confines of this story they pull it off.   Their relationship is very much in the vein of Katharine Hepburn and Cary Grant in ‘Bringing up Baby’.  They fight, bicker and constantly get into trouble.  It is these tiny moments that solidify their relationship and affection for one another.
 
The supporting cast doesn't really hurt the film either.  Michelle Pfeiffer, who once again is playing a witch, is evil, sexy and deliciously charming in role that seems made for her.  She turns her emotions around at the end enough that she lures you into thinking you know how the film will end.  Yet, in the cleverness of the character she brings surprises to the story revealing how much fun ‘Stardust’ really is.
 
When it comes to Robert De Niro performances in movies often I feel that he just plays, well, De Niro.  There never is any real reaching or stretching of the actor for my taste (this started around the time of ‘Casino’).  When I saw he was in ‘Stardust’ and playing a sinister flying pirate, I thought we were going to get De Niro the tough guy flying pirate who talks out of the side of his face and scowls.  Didn't happen.  De Niro, in short, was awesome.  It made me appreciate him on a whole new level.  Yes, the character was phenomenal, but any one else playing that part and there wouldn't have been the surprises or delights I received by watching De Niro and expecting the same type of character that he always plays.  Clearly De Niro needs more roles where he can stretch as an actor.  He isn't getting them. 
 
Ricky Gervais of ‘the Office’ (UK) and ‘Extras’ plays Ferdy the Fence in a small role.  He plays each line for every laugh that he can squeeze out of it.  Also, in small scene stealing role, is Mark Williams (Ron’s father from Harry Potter, Arthur Weasley) who is a goat that has been transformed into a human named Billy.  .
 
The down side of the film is the supporting cast or “other” villains outside of Pfeiffer.  Peter O'Toole as Stronghold’s dying king, has some great moments with his sinister sons but is gone as quick as he arrived.  Mark Strong then emerges and steps forward as Septimus, the true villain of the tale, who is competent for the role but fails to make anything about his performance memorable.  Rupert Everett, who plays one of his brothers, steals many of the scenes from Strong in his limited screen time.  Thankfully, Pfeiffer and her quest to capture and devour the star are central to the main plot.
 
This film is fun like movies are supposed to be.  It’s a shame that the movie going public didn't see it.  All because it was something that they hadn't either experienced before or hadn't heard of before, they truly missed out on something new and original.   ‘Stardust’ was a film that wasn't force fed to the public five minutes after they got home and turned on the TV, opened a magazine or logged onto the computer.  Now you do have the chance to sit back and watch it in the confines of your own home and enjoy a great film.


More Content By Robert T. Trate
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
EvilMonkey • Dec 17, 2007, 06:15am •
I saw it and loved it. Of course I'm biased as I'm a huge Gaiman fan.

kempmike79 • Dec 17, 2007, 06:46am •
I thought this was the best film I saw in the cinema this year.

mbeckham1 • Dec 17, 2007, 08:29am •
Great film. Loved every minute of it. A simple staight forward fairy tale, with classic themes and many clever and memorable character. Had an elegance of craft that recalls Hiya Miyazaki's best work. Less noise, no "money shots", there were plenty of FX but they had a way of backing off when the characters wanted the screen time.

Happy to have caught this in theaters. It was one of the most fun and refreshing movies I've seen in a while. And yes, I agree, DeNiro was incredible.

snallygaster • Dec 17, 2007, 08:52am •
Easily the most unjustly overlooked genre movie of the year. I'm sure it will find its audience on DVD.

goldeneyez • Dec 17, 2007, 09:06am •
kempmike79, I totally agree with you as far as this being the best movie I saw this year. At least it was my favorite of the summer and it was too bad that it was so overlooked by mainstream audiences. I hope that word of mouth will help DVD sales.

Merin • Dec 17, 2007, 10:45am •
Great film. Really missed by audiences.

Gotta grab this one on DVD.

Oddly enough, I have the novel - but could never get into it.

Butch • Dec 17, 2007, 03:19pm •
Actually caught this at the theater and although it was an OK movie it was far from great. Most people I know thought it was just an OK film and thus word of mouth was not helping this picture. I'd give it a B-.

riomstonn • Dec 17, 2007, 04:18pm •
I hope more people catch this as well, now that it's on DVD, but where's the actual DVD review? As in reviewing the extras on the DVD? Any way to add an edit to this review including info on that?

themovielord • Dec 17, 2007, 04:48pm •
riomston,
It had some bloopers and deleted scenes but no commentary track. One by Neil Gaimen would have been great. The "Making of" was okay but obviously nothing really to write about.

"Robert" (aka themovielord)

almostunbiased • Dec 17, 2007, 07:09pm •
I loved this movie. It kills me that it's not on Blu-ray. I decided to go that route now that they are finally formalizing the format with the 1.1 profile, but of course not all studios are on board. I will hold off to see what happens in 2008, but I don't know how long I can wait to buy this movie.

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!