Stargate Universe: Water Review - Mania.com



TV Review

Mania Grade: D+

20 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

  • TV Series: Stargate Universe
  • Episode: Water
  • Starring: Robert Carlyle, Louis Ferreira, Brian J. Smith, Elyse Levesque, David Blue, Alaina Huffman, and Jamil Walker Smith
  • Written By: Carl Binder
  • Directed By: William Waring
  • Network: Syfy
  • Series:

Stargate Universe: Water Review

Drowning

By Rob Vaux     November 01, 2009


Stargate Universe Review
© Syfy/Bob Trate

 

The upswing in quality for Stargate Universe was fun while it lasted. This week, it's back to business as usual: a contrived threat prompting lifeless trudging across a dead planet while various crew members fling various jars of bile at each other. The struggle for survival has rarely been so dull.
 
As if aware of this, the producers add a slight wrinkle to the now-standard plot. This time, it's the ship's water supplies running dangerously low, prompting the Destiny to schedule another pit stop on another empty world. It has ice in abundance, but they need to find pure water untainted by ammonia or other chemicals. Young (Justin Louis) and Scott (Brian J. Smith) constitute the away team, geared up in the only operating space suits onboard. Meanwhile, those sentient dust devils from the pilot episode reappear--apparently causing of the water shortage on the ship--and the crew isn't sure whether they constitute friend or foe. The more gung-ho soldiers want to wipe them out following the evisceration of an unnamed redshirt, while Lt. Johansen (Alaina Huffman) believes a more subtle approach may work.
 
Any way you slice it, it remains terribly unimaginative. While Scott gets another chance to exercise his penchant for endangering himself and Young gets to agonize over losing another crewmember, "Water" does little but touch upon the same expected tropes that the remainder of the series has already worn thin. The alien cloud evokes neither wonder nor fear, while the search for a way to get it off the ship contains no hint of inspiration. Indeed, the final solution depends on a staggering bit of nonsense, the equivalent of encouraging a recalcitrant kitten to get into its carrier for a trip to the vet's. Giving the cloud a second appearance implies future plans for a third--as does its mysterious link to Scott--but its presence here is so dangerously free of substance that any further weight on it may snap the whole thing like a rubber band.
 
The dangers of the planet's surface hold little in the way of respite. Young possesses a nice steely demeanor, but his fretting over Scott's dilemma holds neither drama nor insight. The dilemma itself arrives seemingly at random, as does the possible source of salvation (constituting yet another appearance of the god in the machine). It further indulges in the series' ominous willingness to stick the Catholic martyr label on Scott at the drop of a hat.
 
To top it all off, the various pieces of dramatic interaction onboard the Destiny utterly fail to catch fire. Rush (Robert Carlyle) barks at Eli (David Blue), Johansen barks at Sgt. Greer (Jamil Walker Smith), civilians grumble about fascist soldiers, and fascist soldiers grumble about civilians who don't understand just how bad things are. This appears to be the limits of dramatic conflict on the show (though they're apparently going to drag those god-awful communication stones out for another round next week). The arguments succeed only in reducing the characters' overall appeal, rendering their exploits merely unpleasant instead of gritty and compelling.
 
More importantly, "Water" reveals the paucity of thought which has gone into Universe's basic premise. They wish to show the dark underbelly of space--the desolation, the danger, the scientifically accurate bleakness of it all--but with a few exceptions have been unable to make it interesting. The planet's surface is about as exciting as an empty freezer box, shrouded in darkness and blowing snow without any sense of dramatic flair. I understand the need to keep the Goa'uld and similar bits of space opera away from Universe, but until they can establish equally compelling threats within the series' chosen parameters, it can't help but pale in comparison to its predecessors.
 

TELEVISION REVIEWS

Comments (2) | Bangs (0)
Supernatural: Abandon All...
Comments (7) | Bangs (0)
Fringe: August Review
Comments (3) | Bangs (0)
The Prisoner:...
Comments (19) | Bangs (0)
V Review V: A Bright New Day
Comments (4) | Bangs (0)
The Prisoner: Anvil/Darling...
Comments (16) | Bangs (0)
Heroes: Brother's Keeper...
Comments (7) | Bangs (0)
The Prisoner: Arrival/Harmony...
Comments (7) | Bangs (0)
The Prisoner: The Complete...
Comments (6) | Bangs (0)
Sanctuary: Fragments Review
Comments (13) | Bangs (0)
Stargate Universe: Time Review
Comments (29) | Bangs (0)
SMALLVILLE - 9.8 - "Idol" -...
Comments (0) | Bangs (0)
BRAVE AND THE BOLD - "Fate of...

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 20
1 2 >  >>  
karas1 11/1/2009 6:30:34 PM

I really don't understand the need  to steer clear of previous elements of Stargate lore.  OK, the Ori were pretty dull but the Gou'ald were entertaining antagonists for a decade and the Wratih had finally turned into a complex, layered villian species.

The only reason to eschew such proven plot elements is the desire to court a new audience of mundanes.  They want to attract people that wouldn't be interested in such fantastic plot elements, people who want to see "drama".  Don't get me wrong, drama is fine.  If a show is going to be good, it has to master the ability to deliver the dramatic goods.  And there have been plenty of scifi shows in the past that have relied on smoke and mirriors and silliness instead of delivering competent writing and acting.

On the other hand, the show is on the Scifi (excuse me, Syfy) Channel.  And it takes place on a space ship.  So nobody is going to mistake it for Masterpiece Theater.  And if I wanted to watch "drama" I'd be watching reruns of ER on TNT.  The reason I watch Stargae is to enjoy something that stretches my imagination.

Kara S

 

Hobbs 11/1/2009 8:42:13 PM

I think that is a hard review. I enjoyed it...if you haven't accepted that this isn't going to be like the other Stargate shows 5 episodes into it then its time to change the channel because it's clearly not going in that direction.  There has been enough harsh rips on this show since it started...everyone in genre complains about shows not being given enough time to find its legs yet everyone wanted to jettison this show after the pilot episode because they canceled Atlantis...get over it.  With all the shows playing out this fall I'm sure there is something else everyone can find to keep them entertained.  In the end the only thing that is going to cancel this show are the ratings...and I have no idea how well its doing in that regard.

I personally like the show.  Still keeps enough Stargate in it to keep me happy and the stories have been interesting enough to make me want more.  My one complaint being the Senators daughter and other useless characters...I rip the Senators daughter more than I do the others because of the screen time she has gotten for being absolutely worthless in moving the story forward.  As I said last week all she serves is a F toy for the Scott character...who seems to be the male slut in the show.  I hope they weed out some of the characters as the season moves ahead.

TKay42one 11/1/2009 10:12:17 PM

I've actually never liked Stargate...I liked the original movie when it first came out, but never could get into the shows...just seemed to be on the level of Hercules or Xena for me...and no, I didn't care much for those either...Maybe I just can't take McGyver as a Colonel or a General seriously, not to mention a bald shemale looking guy with a gold thing embedded in his forehead...but I have to say, Water was the first episode of any Stargate show that I've watched the whole way through and I also enjoyed it.  I've set up the next couple weeks to DVR and I'm going to give it a shot.

karas1 11/2/2009 2:39:53 AM

Hobbs, they announced the cancellation of Atlantis one day and greenlighted Universe the next.  They cancelled Atlantis to make this show.  Since I was very fond of Atlantis I find that hard to take.

And Universe isn't all that good.  They are trying so hard to make a BSG clone with the camera work and the music and the adversarial relationships among the humungous cast.  They have jettisoned the entertaining elements that made the Stargate franchise a winner for 15 seasons and replaced them with... not much else.

 I really hate it whey they try to call a scifi show a "drama".  Yes, all scripted dramas are "drama" whatever genre elements they contain.  But they act like scifi and fantasy are stupid things for children and if they want adults to watch it they have to downplay those elements in the press.  They did that with BSG.  Since SG:U is so similar to BSG in so many ways it is obvious to me they are going for the same demographic, "serious" viewers who wouldn't touch a scifi show with  a ten foot pole.

If a show has horses and gunslingers and cowboys in it it's a Western, no matter how elevated the acting and the script.  If a show has space ships and robots and/or aliens in it it is scifi, no matter how many of the cast won Oscars or Emmys for serious "drama".  I find their whole attitude kind of insulting.

I haven't given up on Universe yet.  Last week was really good so I know they have it in them.  If the crew would pull together and accept that they are lost in space and try to work up some enthusiasim for space exploration they might pull it off.  I'm getting tired of watching the characters bicker and whine.

But it wouldn't be very BSG like to have happy characters so I'm not holding out a lot of hope.

Kara S

okonomiyaki4000 11/2/2009 4:55:56 AM

The reason that it's important to steer clear of previous Stargate shows is that they sucked balls. This one looked like it was going in a new direction and might be somehow interesting. It did go in a different direction, but it just sucks in a new way. It's just a boring and cliche "dark and scary spaceship" populated with miserable, unlikeable characters. Is there anything good about this show?

Hobbs 11/2/2009 7:26:29 AM

Kara, i'm guessing you are going to be giving up on it as its clearly not what you want in a Stargate show.  In the end, as I pointed out, we don't matter just the ratings.  You might get your wish for it be canceled if its not doing very well. 

I disagree with your BSG anaology but to each their own.  The documentary camera style is the only thing driving that...people see that and think BSG right off the bat but its not.  However, I'm not going to convince you or anyone else on here that its not.  Are they trying to get the same crowd as BSG?  Yes they are and since I like adult dramas told in a sci-fi way I'm good with that.

Like I said, Atlantis is gone not coming back.  5 years was a good run.  Time to move on.   Just like the old Star Trek. 

Okono....The other Stargate sucked yet last week you admited you never watched them before.  I thought you were going to stop watching the show and not comment it on it anymore?  Or do you just like to be negative all the time in these blogs?

Myrdinn 11/2/2009 10:29:21 AM

But, hey... the Colonel is now doing Captain's logs (at the end of the show). So, what was once a death notice is now a function of military reporting (and, a bit of a nod to naval/sci-fi history).

Must admit, I'm not happy with the Senator's daughter. Eli also needs... work. And, someone needs to ask the ship "hey, why don't you go get the raw resources to fix yourself... and give us the technical manuals to do the fixing." If the tech predates that which required the gene, it should be simpler than that which made Atlantis, and thus, easier for them to figure out (even though I'll admit the Terrans basically have only figured out how to use the user-interface for most ancient tech in both SG-1 and SG-A).

troopershades 11/2/2009 10:49:37 AM

whats with the same music I always keep reading?  Are my speakers playing back different music from everyone else?  The soft sweeping strings of McCreary in BSG sound NOTHING like Goldsmiths electric and synth influenced score.  I dunno, maybe its just been a long time since I have heard BSGs score but they dont sound anything alike to me.

MrOptimusPrime 11/2/2009 1:32:43 PM

Ok so we go wayyyyyyy back down on the scale of the episode this week.  I for one would like to see a little, no scratch that, a lot more of the ship itself!!  Here we have this great feat of engineering from the Ancients and so far we have seen the gate room, the living quarters, a shuttle and a lot of hallways??  Where is the bridge, the weapons, the medical bay, the engine room, etc. so that they can at least attempt to try and reverse course instead of just flying away and away from home??  At some point there has to be some kind of u-turn to try and get back home but we have seen no hint of that yet.  OK OK so the air and the radiation and now the water ok we get all that......now how about actuall focusing on getting home??  If they do not do something soon this show will be cancelled based on what I am reading here.  

On a side note mania administrators......can we please have an update on the Screenshot game on this site??  no new ones since 9/11/09???  wtf!?!

 

TKay42one 11/2/2009 2:12:42 PM

I'm with you Hobbs...about dramas told in the sci fi genre.  I understand what you're saying though Kara...I don't know, my favorite shows have always been either really dramatic or really tongue-in-cheek...for instance, some of my favorite shows include Dexter, Oz, Law & Order: SVU, Buffy, Angel, Firefly...but the previous Stargate shows never fit into either catagory for me.  What I saw of them,  they were tongue-in-cheek while TRYING with all their might to be serious.  Just didn't work for me.  But then, I never got into BSG, so I don't have the problem of constantly comparing SG Universe to it.

1 2 >  >>  

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

POPULAR TOPICS