Box Office News

Send to a Friend



To: (email)


To: (name)


From: (name)


Message:



Studios Report Record $9.62 Billion Year

By: Jarrod Sarafin, News Editor
Date: Thursday, January 03, 2008
Source: The Trades

Industry box office grosses in totaled $9.62 billion in 2007, or 5% more than a year earlier and 4% more than the industry's previous high from 2002. Ticket sales also were up from 2006, with 1.41 billion admissions marking a 1% year-over-year uptick and the highest tally since 2004. In that year, admissions totaled $1.48 billion, or 5% more than in '07, before plunging to $1.38 billion in 2005.

Domestic moviegoers paid an average $6.82 per ticket in '07, or 4% more than in '06. In another first, all six major studios jumped the $1 billion mark at the domestic box office, with 20th Century Fox crossing over during the last weekend of the year.

In terms of market share, Paramount won the crown thanks to their 2006 merger with DreamWorks, posting total receipts of $1.49 billion, up 55% from last year.

Warner Bros. posted box office of $1.42 million, gaining 34%. Disney came in third, posting receipts of $1.36 billion, down 9%.

Sony was down 27% from last year, with total box office of $1.24 million in 2007.

Universal posted receipts of $1.1 billion, a 38% gain.

Fox saw box office of $1.01 billion, down 28%.

So, as I said in yesterday's box office report, the question still remains the same here...Will they top this sort of record in 2008? Can Iron Man, Indiana Jones, Hellboy 2, The Dark Knight, Harry Potter 6 and Star Trek perform as well, if not more, then Spider-Man 3, Pirates 3, Harry Potter 5, Transformers and I Am Legend?



More Content By Jarrod Sarafin, News Editor
Agent Zero & Barnell Revealed for WOLVERINE
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Amazon Producing Fantasy CHILD
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Cameron Updates Status on AVATAR
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Doomed JLA, More Mutants & Ant Man!
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
First Bloody Pic from LOST BOYS 2
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
IRON MAN Trailer Debuts on Feb 28 Lost
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
New Victims Ready for FINAL DESTINATION 4
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Two More Gangsters for Mann's ENEMIES
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Weaving Tracks After the WOLFMAN
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
BIONIC WOMAN Officially Axed by NBC?
(Thursday, February 21, 2008)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1
Dazzler • Jan 03, 2008, 04:29am •
Strike might change that next year.

WhiteKnight • Jan 03, 2008, 05:24am •
If I were a WGA writer, this press release would prompt me to issue this response.

"Pay up, bitches!"

rgtchtiger • Jan 03, 2008, 06:40am •
Dazzler,

It's more likely that 2009 would be affected revenue-wise than 2008. We should have pretty much a full slate of movies this year, but if the strike isn't resolved by spring/summer, next year could show a major drop off in box office receipts and attendance. I'm curious to know what the studios are prepared to do to bring people to the movies if the strike is prolonged. Re-releases? Special editions? As far as I know, there are only a handful of movies that are in production right now with 2009 release dates in mind (Avatar being the major one that comes to mind).

LOTRSUXS • Jan 03, 2008, 07:27am •
Well im glad the studios had a great year and are bragging about it. But, whatever happened to bragging about the quality of the movies as opposed to how much money they made?

zack2366 • Jan 03, 2008, 07:37am •
yeah 2009 will suck ass in the begingin of the year -- hmmm 9.62 billion -- um some of the movies made sucked ass --30 days of night ... for example im gonna need a refund of 10,000.00 because - AMC raped me this year -- 9.00- adult ticket - 7.00 for a SMALL popcorn and a SMALL drink ...

Merin • Jan 03, 2008, 08:26am •
Some movies suck every year.

For me, this year was far better than last year. A great genre year, all around. Some of the films weren't as good as I would have hoped, but most everything I saw entertained me. I am pretty easy to entertain (just no blurry, confusing fight scenes that have no point, please.)

I, too, as a writer would be saying "Wait, your revenue increased AGAIN and you are saying you want to cut back on what you pay us, and refuse to pay us anything for the increasing digital sales? WTF?"

2009 might become the year of the small budget indie film - smaller indie projects, unless I'm mistaken, don't need union workers due to their size.

agentkooper • Jan 03, 2008, 11:57am •
Merin -
No movie of any size has to use union workers, but to get released by a big production house everyone has to be paid union scale.

While the strike may give smaller films more room to shine the only people who will be enjoying them are the film fest attendees.

Edit: No one has to be union in big movies, but the unions have such a strong hold that pretty much everyone is. This is also due to the union's stranglehold on the industry. A friend of mine optioned a screenplay and was contacted by a union rep informing him of the need to join the union THE SAME DAY he signed his contract.

ponyboy76 • Jan 03, 2008, 01:10pm •
Unions do have a strong hold on the industry but it makes sense to be in one, because if you weren`t you`d most likely be getting screwed out of proper wages, benefits, medical, etc. And it also makes business sense, if I`m a producer to ire only union members. It guarantees a certain quality that you may not get from non-union.
I`m personally not a big "joiner" but I definitely see the need for the WGA and SAG. I want someone to help me if I`m getting screwed by the big wigs which is what`s happening now.
Anyway, it will be interesting to see if they can top 2007. I`m hyped for all the movies coming out this year, but I think we`ll just have to wait and see.

irascible • Jan 03, 2008, 01:18pm •
That's great for the studios. Maybe now they'll quit putting those stupid ads at the beginning of the DVD I PAY FOR preaching to me about "stealing" like they are hemmoraging money. I'm not condoning pirating but FFS - they are ripping me off all the time! And here's 1 other thought - why don't you take a million or so off of one of the actors that is being paid $30 million for 1 picture and pay some writers.

Merin • Jan 03, 2008, 03:00pm •
Stranglehold is such a negative term, agentkooper. It's like you tipped your hand. ;)

Seriously, though, as much as I love Sin City, I feel guilty everytime I watch it because RR went around the Union all because Frank Miller didn't qualify as a Director without being a member of the Union. It was a silly stand to make - really silly.
Frank Miller got his credit, and if he wants to be a Director he needs to step up with everyone else and support other Directors. Being independently well-off and successful does he really need the Union looking out for him? Maybe not, but solidarity means all together not only the needy together.

If the Union didn't contact your friend, agentkooper, then the studios would be able to underpay new writers, undermine Union workers, and basically screw over the writers, directors, etc - the studios have all the levers of power in film making and it is only through organized labor that the writers and directors and costume designers and such can fight against being ripped off.

1
Login to post a comment!