Movie Review
35 Comments | Add a Comment

0


SUPERMAN RETURNS

By: Rachel Reitsleff
Date: Tuesday, June 27, 2006

To see SUPERMAN RETURNS is to see a man in love, and no, I'm not referring to either the flying fellow in the cape or his bespectacled alter ego though to be sure they are both utterly devoted to Lois Lane. The adoration glowing through every frame of the movie comes from director Bryan Singer, who has done something that most filmmakers wouldn't dare he treats his new project as though it's a continuation of 1978's SUPERMAN and 1980's SUPERMAN II, both starring the late Christopher Reeve. What's even more amazing than Singer taking this approach is that it works so well, up to and including the fact that Brandon Routh takes to Superman and Clark as though born to embody both we don't forget Reeve, but there's a real sense of rightful torch-passing here.

In SUPERMAN RETURNS, Kal-El has been gone for five years in what's proved a futile quest to find answers in the remains of his homeworld Krypton. He comes back to find his beloved Lois (Kate Bosworth) has a young son (Tristan Lake Leabu), is living with Richard White (James Marsden), nephew of Daily Planet editor Perry (Frank Langella), and she's won a Pulitzer for an article about why Superman is unnecessary. However, with Lex Luthor (Kevin Spacey) out of jail and up to his old world-imperiling tricks, Lois and everybody else may find that they need Superman after all ...

What's both dangerous and great about SUPERMAN RETURNS is the way Singer and writers Michael Dougherty & Dan Harris (working from a story all three created together) anticipate an almost Pavlovian response from the audience. John Williams' score for the earlier SUPERMAN films is utilized liberally here (with proper credit), and damned if there isn't a thrill when the main Superman theme heralds our hero's arrival and a dreamy feel when Superman and Lois float to the strains of "Can You Read My Mind?" (sans vocals). There are also clips of the late Marlon Brando as Jor-El (from the '78 film) and even a picture of Glenn Ford, who played Clark's adoptive father, on the Kent mantelpiece. All this perhaps shouldn't work, but it does it's not just that we're all familiar with Superman, but that we're familiar with this particular take on the mythology. For one thing, it's a huge time-saver a lot of things that would otherwise require explanation are rightly taken for granted and for another, it's affecting in ways that something brand-new cannot accomplish.

The perfection of Routh as both Superman and Clark cannot be overstated. He looks great in the cape and tights, but much more important, he absolutely gets the concept of someone who really is fighting for truth and justice, uncynically willing to put his life on the line and yet is able to marry this persona to the shyly goofy Clark. There's one small moment, when Clark waves at Lois across the office of the Daily Planet, where you can pretty much feel the theatre react to the realization that this guy is the real thing.

Most of the supporting cast are extremely fine as well, with Bosworth a gutsy, lovely Lois and Spacey a gleeful Lex who is nevertheless capable of scary seriousness.

So yes, we're aware of readers who are fascinated by the Cinescape movie review grades why doesn't SUPERMAN RETURNS get an A?

For one thing, Singer and the writers create a number of sequences that are confusing as they're happening, only to be explained later. Once or twice, this is intriguing, but eventually, it simply interrupts the narrative flow we're trying to figure out exactly what it is we just saw so that we can't fully enjoy the following sequence, let alone figure out how it all fits together, so that often the movie has a stop/start quality. On the flip side of this, Singer sometimes overdoes the emotion, lingering on moments so long that they start to lose potency. Finally, the Christ analogy gets hit hard one (or maybe more) too many times. In Singer's X-MEN films, the social commentary worked because the metaphors to real life were clever and applicable. In SUPERMAN RETURNS, there's sometimes a sense that the filmmakers feel our natural responses aren't to be trusted and we need a nudge to remind us that our protagonist is heroic and selfless and generally good. Really, we believe you, he's Superman you don't need to remind us quite so often.

SUPERMAN RETURNS is not perfect, but it has a true sense of wonder and earned reverence. There's a feeling of real rediscovery here that's truly magical.

Related Products
User Reviews
Comments/Responses
1 2 3 4 > >>
• Jun 27, 2006, 07:05am •
At least you gave it a B+, which surprises me since it wasn't directed by Brett Ratner. God only knows what that guy did to the Cinescape reviewers to get a glowing review for the crap known as X3.
Other than this and Ebert, I gotta say the reviews have been solid. I like how Cinescape picks apart this film on why it doesn't get an A, yet every other review so far never got picked apart too much, like say X3! Yes I know I am harping on X3, it sucked! I can't let it go, it was such a great series with such a bad finale.

• Jun 27, 2006, 07:52am •
I've been following the dispute over the letter grades. I, too, used to find it annoying that the average seems to be "B" (an "average" grade should be "C", and if there are never any "F"s or "A"s it further brings the value of the system into question) and that the letter grade doesn't always seem to agree with the text of the review, but I've long since learned to ignore the letter grade in favor of the text of the review. You get more info from the text than you do from something as restrictively symbolic as a letter grade, and you get a better sense of what grade YOU yourself would give it. Rachel really makes it sound like this would be worth seeing, despite my not being a fan of the Chris Reeve series and (as a comics reader) my disagreement with the liberties taken with the characters.

• Jun 27, 2006, 08:18am •
Myklspader, I empathize with you dude! I too, know the pain of sitting through Brett Ratner`s craptastic, story destroying,, Hack riddled, bastard stepchild, bile smoothie, that was X3. I was in between movies last week, so I decided to walk in a watch it again until my next film started. I sat there for like 10 mins hoping that I was just wrong, or the champagne I drank before messed with my senses enough to judge it unfairly. Sad to say, it still sucked ass and I could no longer sit through the agonzing "final battle". I ended up waiting outside for my next movie.

• Jun 27, 2006, 09:32am •
Ok, so just about every critic says this movie is top notch. But the Cinescape (On their scale of 1-13...there are 13 possible letter grades)reviewers think that this movie is only AS GOOD as X-Men 3 and only ONE point better than: SCARY MOVIE 4, MI:3, Poseidon, F and F Tokyo Drift, Davinci, and AMERICAN DREAMZ(All got a B). This movie is only 2 points better than SHAGGY DOG, FINAL DESTINATION 3, ULTRAFUCKINGVIOLET, DOOM, and Underworld 2 (All got B-s). It is only 4 points better than Basic Instinct 2 and Aeon Flux. (All got Cs...I threw them in because they needed an F). That is impossible. All of these movies are mediocre at best, yet they all get Bs of some kind and now EVEN SUPERMAN gets it. How come this movie is disected to no end and is given a B+ when it's clearly a more positive review than that and a movie with BOW WOW gets only a point lower? SCARY MOVIE 4 is within 1 point of Superman Returns? I don't know about you guys, but though it may have had some laughs I cannot fathom how I am going to walk out of Superman Returns this afternoon and say "Eh, this was slightly better than Scary Movie 4" PLEASE!!! I said it before, I will say it again. From F-A+ there are 13 possible grades!!!! USE THE OTHER LETTERS!!! I see they're capable of typing a review with more than one letter so they must be on their keyboard....USE THEM! JESUS.
(For those who say "why read it if it makes you mad" I've already said I come for the other articles and love cinescape, but the reviews kill me)

• Jun 27, 2006, 09:39am •
On a positive note, I CANNOT F-ing wait to see this movie. I think it's going to be stellar. At last, the Donner Superman will continue as it should have instead of crashing and burning withe the Supercrap 3 and Superman 4:The Quest for Crap. Tonight when I go to see this, I'm going to the best restaraunt I can find that has take out, getting the best looking thing on the menu, taking it to the movie theatre and enjoying a wonderful night at the movies. THen I'm going to wash it down with a giant $4 Cherry coke from the concession stand and I'm going to LOVE every minute of it. God Bless America and Gob Bless Superman!

• Jun 27, 2006, 10:09am •
I am not a big fan of Cinscape`s grade scale either , at least as far as who they have given which letter, but I do really listen to reviews anyway. I do read Cinescapes because it is interesting to get the reviewers take on it. In the end I will obviously make my own decision. Stars, thumbs, beer cans, letters of the alphabet, it all comes down to opinion. It is kind of crazy that the point differences between some very bad movies and really good ones were only like 1 or 2 though. That`s not much of a scale.
Oh and Damn you guys who get to see Superman Returns this week. I hate you all!! It doesn't come out here until July 14th. I was sure it would be a worldwide release, but apparently that would cost too much. My only concilation is that POTC comes out a day before it does in the U.S.

• Jun 27, 2006, 10:14am •
I give SR a solid A. Can't wait to see it again. The quibbles in the above review (thanks for not spoiling the surprises) are all that keep it from an A+, and one other: Is Lois invulnerable, too? She gets knocked all over the place in this movie and doesn't even get bruised!

_ BT

• Jun 27, 2006, 01:48pm •
The smart thing for Cinescape to do at this point, so they might start from a fresh slate, would be to scrap the current screwed up ratings system. They have shown that they can't effectively use the A,B+,B,B-,C+, etc. system. My recommendation: Go to Stars. 5 stars, 4 stars, 3 stars, and if you must (but don't F it up, pun intended) use half stars. This way they could start anew and not have to be afraid of how they rate a movie because of how bad they abused the system in the past. Or better yet, screw a grade at all and replace it with a reader poll within the column that let's us rate the movie.

• Jun 27, 2006, 02:03pm •
Saw this movie last night in Phoenix. I was worried about how it was going to turn out for the past few months. Let me say that this is the summer movie we've been waiting for. It simply is a great movie. You don't have to know the first two movies to enjoy this. From the beginning titles which are exactly like the originals through to the end, I can't say enough about it. Let's hope it's true that all the players signed up for 2 more. There's some good starting points laid out in this movie for sequals.

• Jun 27, 2006, 03:52pm •
Bunch of whinny babies, the lot of y'as.....

You know, reviews are guideline and are always made to give you an idea of what the movie is all about.

Is it possible that all the people who review movies who also loves comics can truly give an opinion about this movie without being biased about who directed it or the stories involved??

Come on......

How many of you babies didn't like X-3 yet it did get good and bad reviews (and I loved it so pfff), but, how many of you didn't like it?

Same thing with reviews. Some will like something, some will find it ok, some won't like it. Just because most movies get a b-, b or b+, doesn't mean they are all the same.

And seriously, how many A's movies are out in a year? 3....4 tops. The average type of movies that comes out, especially during the summer since it's when the no-brainer, popcorn movies comes out, it's just normal to see the same type of reviews.

On the good side, I can't wait to see the movie.

1 2 3 4 > >>
Login to post a comment!