As a casual X-men fan I thought Singer's previous X-men films were very entertaining.   However, I can appreciate how hardcore fans (those who read the comics) might be disappointed with how loosely the subject matter was handled.   I'll never accept Nolan's / Ledger's  interpretation of "the Joker." 

Can we at least agree that Singer was wise to get some of the X-men out of those ridiculous costumes they wore in the books. 

I guess it's an open debate on whether Superhero movies should faithfully replicate the comics from whence they came or if in the interest of telling a good story it's acceptable to take risks and depart from the comic's mythos. 

A student of Norse/Scandanavian mythology could rip what Marvel did to Thor

It appears that all of you know the actor Bryan Sy (I don't). 

Personally, given casting choices as well as the characters presented in the films, I would rather no one adapted previous stories.  It only leads to disappointment. 

I thought Bishop as well when I saw this.  While he was not present in the comic arc (that was about 12 years before his time) he was present in the animated series version of it. 

 Future Darwin...... Waits for reprocussions.

Singers largely using the time travel aspects of the Days of Future Past to change some of the issues with X-3. He said as much in an interview.

Never heard of this man, had to look up his IMDB resume, French actor, no credits outside France.  What character he could play, I don't know, Bishop was born in an alternate timeline and about 20 years or so beyond the DoFP future.  However Havok was in the last movie about 20 years or so before Cyclops was a member so we know the studios aren't really concerned about canon integrity.  Still I'm not going to jump on the "This movie's going to suck" bandwagon until I see something more than the casting call.

 Holy Crap!

I read Sy and for a minute thought it was that "Gangnam Style" idiot!