themovielord's Review

SAW IV

By: themovielord
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007

SPOILERS


Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) is dead on the autopsy table when the coroner finds tapes inside his stomach. A Detective Hoffman (Costas Mandylor) arrives and immediately plays the tapes. The voice is Jigsaw’s saying, “My work will continue”.

Each and every Halloween for the last four years there has been a ‘Saw’ movie. These films are more than gore and more than torture. They are smart, cunning, and a scream of a good time. This year’s installment was at first confusing, however in the end when I put all the jigsaw pieces together I saw what a brilliant undertaking the makers of ‘Saw’ had accomplished.

Yes, it helps and is absolutely necessary to have seen all the other ‘Saw’ movies. Maybe not so much the original ‘Saw’, but the second and third are essential, oddly enough the first one is all set up. The second ‘Saw’ really lays down the foundation for a grander story that is being told. So after watching 2 and 3 again, you have all the faces of the side players in your head to move on to ‘Saw IV’ where they are all major players. This works in the story but is confusing as hell because without the actors being big names or even second tier players you barely remember them from the previous two films.

‘Saw IV’ immediately opens with the autopsy as I mentioned before. Yes, Jigsaw/ John is dead. Now put that to the back of your head and save it for ‘Saw V’. Saw IV takes place at the exact same time as ‘Saw III’. Yes, that is correct, this isn’t what happens next. This is what is going on and what other people are doing trying to prevent the next set of murders. Because you will see Jeff (Angus Macfadyen) and Amanda (Shawnee Smith) again and that will answer some questions but  you will be stuck with some new questions as well. Which is what makes ‘Saw’ films fun once the gore is over. “What did that mean? And what do you think about…?” These become the all important questions for the initiated and daring that walk into and out of a ‘Saw’ film.

‘Saw IV’ is heavy with flash backs into Jigsaw/ John’s life. We witness the events that brought him to do what he does/ did. This calculating mind has a reason for everything. It is my wish and hope that the writers/ producers/ and directors also have the same mantra, especially with ‘Saw V’ already slated for next year. There is a larger story in the works and after watching four of these films I really hope it pays off. Now with Jigsaw dying he is recruiting someone new or has he already got someone besides Amanda helping him out?  A question to be answered in ‘Saw V’, hopefully. This film has a tad less gore and shock than the first three (or maybe I’m just used to it now) but the story is what really matters and the writers and director have taken the story and perfectly interwoven it into ‘Saw III’. Most people will be confused by this, I was, but after dissecting the film and removing the beginning and the end it was clear to me that these events coincided with ‘Saw III’; a brilliant move in story telling and perfect to keep this franchise and story going into the fifth one.

It would have been an A+ but...

My only complaint was that I counted the boom microphone 10 times. I blatantly saw it in shots, hanging over actor’s heads, and next to their faces. Jason Hopfner is credited as the boom mic operator, so does the fault lie with him or the 1st AD Elizabeth Scherberger for not catching it?  Maybe once in a big budget movie you might see a shadow or the tip of a mic hanging but 10 times (maybe 12, I was after all trying to watch the film)?



Click here to read the staff review by Mania.
Buy These Related Products
Comments/Responses
1
themovielord • Oct 30, 2007, 05:22pm •

themovielord • Nov 05, 2007, 06:52pm •
Maybe because Halloween was tired and so over done that a remake was not necessary. You could probably make the same argument about SAW. I saw Halloween and Saw both for free and for Halloween I wanted my 2 hours back. Saw I would have sat through again...

Thanks for reading though. What did you like recently in horror movies swansong?

GentlemenDeath • Nov 05, 2007, 08:15pm •
It is amazing how a movie like this can get a A-, but Halloween gets an F-!!

I thought this WAS the worst Saw to come out...Hell all of them are horrible movies and it is amazing how these keep on making money.

I am not even going to bother writing a review about this movie because in case, that would be giving the movie more credit then it deserves!!!

GentlemenDeath • Nov 05, 2007, 09:49pm •
Posting's are all screwy...

I consider myself a fan of horror movies. If I had to settle on ONE genre I could live off of for the rest of my life, I would not hesitate to say, Horror.

I think the thing that bothers me most about the Saw films is that they hash them out SO QUICKLY! I mean, every year since the first one came out has there been a Saw every Halloween weekend....And I think the thing that disturbs me the most about it, is that people keep on going to see it. It is the same shit, rehased over and over again...But I suppose you can say that about a lot of movies and genres, so at what point do you stop to care?

I like to give movies a chance, especially the ones I do not want to see. Like this one, I did not want to see it, but my GF loves these movies (Go figure!) so I said, WTF not, I will go. AND Like the last two I had to sit and watch, I wanted to leave. But I drag her to the movies I like, so I think it would be only fair if I wathed hers, you dig?

BUT, to finally answer your question themovielord, which was,"What do I like recently in horror movies?"....That is a good question. I don't! I DO like Zombie though and I think besides Halloween (Because it was a remake and technically NOT HIS OWN CREATION) House of 1,000 Corpses and The Devil's Rejects were some of the best Horror movies I have seen in years!!

Zombie brought a new and old perspective to the genre which honestly seems like it is dying off again, like it always has and always will until a certain horror movie will spawn rip-offs...

I honestly liked Hostel II. I thought it was much better then the first and it seems like Eli Roth actually sat down and came up with a script. I also think he is another director that does not get that much credit. Look at Cabin Fever. You would be lying to me if you said that did not bother you!

Anyways, I can go on and on, but I better stop while I am ahead. I was not bashing you directly, and I am sorry if I conveyed that. It is alwasy nice to have a somewhat calm debate.

themovielord • Nov 05, 2007, 10:38pm •
LOL! Bashing please. So the GF drags you? Ha! I found the Zombie's previous two films so dull and lacked any real creativity. It was to me, Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2... boring. Though I did love Hostel 2... did you see the review for that on Mania? That guy liked it too.

GentlemenDeath • Nov 06, 2007, 04:15pm •
Hey, different tastes for different people. Out of 10 people, ONE person was bound to not like The Devil's Rejects and I guess that is you. No worries though, everyone has different tastes.

"Dull and lacked any real creativity"....LMAO!!!
That is a good one there....

snallygaster • Nov 07, 2007, 02:09pm •
Regarding the issue of the boom microphone: I wouldn't hold it against anybody in the movie's production staff.

The person who is at fault is your theater's projectionist. Part of their job is to make sure the movie is framed properly on the screen. If you're seeing the boom mic that many times, then they had the image mis-aligned.

themovielord • Nov 10, 2007, 12:30am •
You know I thought of that too. And since I am the only person mentioning it maybe that was true. I did see it once or twice next to someone's face though...

1
Login to post a comment!