What really cracks me up is that everyone blames Ratner for X3. Ratner used Singer's sh!tty script because he didn't have enough time to get a rewrite when Singer jumped shipped in pre-production. If you fanbois want to blame someone, blame Singer. He screwed two movies over.

And without lube.

The Incredible Hulk makes Avatards mad because the CGI and hiumans are incorporated so much better.

Louis actually directs people and not CGI.  And think if Louis wasted 10 years of his life on Incredible Hulk how much better it would be. Cameron wasted 10 years for kids movie. Keep up the spending Avatards maybe the tea party will back you up.

Louis with exec producers Peter Ralphie Billingsly and Jon Froggy Favreau.

DaForce1- is that true??? WOW... i didnt think I could hate Singer anymore than I did, but u made it possible.

I should have known it was his brilliant idea to kill of 3 of the most important Xmen of all time, introduce Angel as a newcomer douche bag, take away Mystique's powers, make up some kid who can cure mutant abilities, have Shadowcat defeat the Juggernaut, make up a bunch of lame ass mutants (including that lame ass asian dude who can only kill people by F*cking Hugging them!!??), and make Wolverine cry like a lil Bich!! Brilliant Bryan!! Just great!!!

Way too much unwarranted Singer hate aound here. You realise the changes he made to the X-men were so it could be made on a modest budget and could be sold to the exectutives at Fox as a viable movie that could appeal to the non comic book reader. Before X-men studios had very little faith in the superhero movie. Batman and Robin being the straw that broke the camel's back, but movies like Spawn didn't help. Yes I know Blade was a success but most people wouldn't know that was based on a comic book. Without Singer's efforts to get X-men made the way he did we wouldn't have had Spiderman, Hulk, Iron Man, or the upcomming Thor,  Capitain America, and the Avengers. Heck even Batman got a reboot because of Marvels success. Don't hate the man because he had to compromise to get X-Men made, without it we wouldn't be so close to the uncompromised version of the Avengers we all want to see.

There's a big difference between "compromising" and making up total CRAP!!!  A Baby could have made better negotiations about the storylines and character development than wat we got. With Singer or without Singer, eventually  Xmen would have been made. No need to praise the lucky guy who got to direct it cuz u think he paved the way for all comic movies. Spiderman and etc. would have came along eventually regardless. SO with that said, YES, Bryan SInger FD up xmen forever unless there's a reboot.

The real villain in the demise of the X-Men and FF and DD is Fox. And I doubt that Fox would hire Singer again at any rate after he bailed on them just when X3 was going into production they won't forget that. 

Violator - yep and someone else would have invented the light bulb, or the telephone or the automobile. That doesen't matter, it's who did it first, and to say that someone would have eventually made it is total a garbage argument. Fox never would have green lit X-Men without those changes 10 years ago, today maybe but that is a different story. Hating on a guy for getting the job done when no one else could is just sad. And what exactly is total CRAP!!!    

X-Men 2 rocked BTW. Total CRAP? So sad that you probably saw all 3 crap movies in the theater though right? X-Men 3 was CRAP though I will give you that.

After a lot of thinking I do think Fantastic Four- daredevil- Elektra- could be great movies if redone the right way.

Fantastic four- just needs a decent story line- and thas a tough one to pull off but it could be done.

Daredevil- Dont go near Ben afleck with a 1000 foot pole  and have a story with the Charachter Stick- Daredevil's mentor involved- use a Frank miller story line and do it the right way this time.

Elecktra- It would be tough to put an actress to this one. It can be done but it would also need another good story- I really dont read much elecktra so I dont have anything for this one.

Hell even catwoman could be a great movie if it had been done the right way

Hudsontaco-" Xmen2 rocked btw" That is ur argument for defending the Xmen trilogy of crap? Ya, Xmen 2 was not bad ... COMPARED to the other 2 crapfests. Im glad at the least u can agree that x3 was crap ( which kinda contradicts ur argument for defending bryan singer btw for being involved w/ Xmen). My argument is that Singer's xmen sucked period. And it IS true that they would have made other movies despite Singer's involvment. Im sure an XMen movie would have been made without the all mighty bryan singer. So u saying Spiderman and etc wouldn't have been made without his involvment is crap.

It does matter who did it first, but i just wish it was someone else and im sure most maniacs can agree w/ me. Btw, other comic movies were made cuz xmen made alot of money (due to fans and the general following and love of xmen), NOT because Singer made a great movie. You get my point?

NO MORE ANIME MOVIES  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  God , are they trying to piss us off ? Hollywood has already shown us they can't hack it when it comes to those types of movies. they should stick with what they know, comic book superheroes. It's the only thing they know how to do right, with minor  exceptions of course, but still.