Mania Review: Lincoln -

Mania Grade: A

20 Comments | Add


Rate & Share:


Related Links:



  • Starring: Daniel Day-Lewis, Sally Field, Tommy Lee Jones, David Strathairn, Joseph Gordon-Leviit, James Spader, Jared Harris and Hal Holbrook
  • Written by: Tony Kushner
  • Directed by: Steven Spielberg
  • Studio: Dreamworks Pictures
  • Rating: PG-13
  • Run Time: 149 minutes
  • Series:

Mania Review: Lincoln

Presidential power.

By Rob Vaux     November 09, 2012

 How do you find the man behind the statue? How do you explore the flaws that helped create a saint? That’s the challenge of portraying Abraham Lincoln on film, a challenge that (the occasional vampiric throwdown notwithstanding) filmmakers have studiously avoided since the 1940s. Deifying him makes for a boring movie and trying to cover all the events of his life turns it into (to paraphrase director Steven Spielberg) a “greatest hits collection.” So when the time came for Spielberg to tackle the Great Emancipator in this extraordinary new biopic, he had to find the right way to crack that code.

We shouldn’t be at all surprised that he succeeded. Not with the great Daniel Day-Lewis in the lead and Doris Kearne Goodwin’s amazing book Team of Rivals as a basis. The surprise is how engrossing, enlightening and flat-out incredible that success turns out to be. It focuses on a few brief months and one overwhelming task. Through them, we gain insight into both the man and the leader that has yet to appear on such a scale.

The task was the passage of the 13th Amendment, which outlawed slavery for good and all. In January of 1865, it was far from a done deal. The South was on its knees, but had not yet surrendered, and Washington remained as much a hotbed of shifty political ass-hats as it is today. If he waited until the South surrendered, Lincoln risked losing the Amendment to waffling compromise. The public would be behind it if it meant winning the war, but afterwards? “Well gee, those black folks might take our jobs, and we couldn’t support them all if they moved north, and the Confederates have learned their lesson, so maybe we’ll just let them keep their slaves, and…” Lincoln refused to entertain that awful possibility and its accompanying cost: 600,000 men killed by their countrymen for absolutely nothing.

The problem? He didn’t have the votes. The pro-slavery Democrats universally opposed him and even some of the Republicans had issues with his goals. (It should be noted that party ideologies back then were very different from ideologies now; in other words, ain’t nobody taking sides in any 21st century arguments here, so everyone relax.) He got it done by switching to full-bore sneaky bastard mode. Lincoln demonstrates the 16th President’s amazing political acumen in cutting backroom deals, engaging in routine blackmail and strong-arming various D.C. weasels who weren’t going along with the program. He did all this even as he secretly met with Southern representatives eager to negotiate a peace, and dealt with his grieving wife Mary (Sally Field) and army-happy son Robert (Joseph Gordon-Levitt).

The resulting portrait gives us an intimate feeling of how he functioned beneath the enormous burdens of his time. He states his hopes and his fears eloquently enough, but Day-Lewis also displays the richness of his humor, the depths of his conviction and the terrible consequences he faced if he failed. He’s no angel; just someone with a clear eye on his goal and an understanding of the things he needs to do to reach it. The real politick of his efforts stands in sharp contrast to the glorified speeches and moral deification we’re accustomed to with him. We see in sharp terms how an absolute good can arise from a thousand tiny bends and breaks… and, more importantly, how a shrewd and canny group of people made it happen in the midst of the rollicking chaos of democracy.

The story thus encompasses both Lincoln himself and our own political process (which doesn’t look all that different 150 years later). The film delves into peripheral figures such as abolitionist Thaddeus Stevens (Tommy Lee Jones in an Oscar-worthy turn) and gutless Congressman Wells A. Hutchins (Walton Goggins), but always keeps the focus on the Amendment – and Lincoln’s efforts to pass it – rather than their own equally fascinating lives. It’s apt to leave you scrambling for the history books when you get done, and that’s kind of the point. The director remains an ardent humanist, and the comparison suggests hope for our country and its venerable institutions far more than despair. “This shit has gone on a long time,” Spielberg tells us. “And slowly but surely, it makes things better.” Especially with a figure so implacable at its head: embodied to perfection by Day-Lewis and all the more endearing for his flawed, sometimes stumbling efforts to create a miracle out of mud. Lincoln reminds us why we build so many statues to the man, as well as how little he saw of that glory in the waning days of his life. We’re left admiring him all the more for his similarities to us mere mortals, and wondering sadly how much different life might be right now if the fates had allowed him to live. 


Showing items 1 - 10 of 20
1 2 >  >>  
hanso 11/9/2012 4:31:27 AM

An A?  Spielberg like a boss.

goirish83 11/9/2012 5:46:48 AM

And the Oscar for Best Movie, Best Actor, and Best Director goes to.................................................................

violator14 11/9/2012 7:31:55 AM Avengers, Robert Downey Jr., and Joss Whedon!!!!  *clap clap clap*!!!

goirish83 11/9/2012 9:05:33 AM

@violator14.........LOL, good one.  Too bad it will never happen.

InnerSanctum 11/9/2012 1:04:59 PM

 Been anticipating the film.  As long as it talks more about the man.  In all the good and bad.  He was a product of his time and a gret leader.  But, he was flawed and a victim of his periods prejudices.  I'm afraid, based on the previews, they will glaze over that and just glorify him.  

KungPow 11/9/2012 1:46:42 PM

Study Lincoln and you find that he had far less flaws than 99% of us.  So I don't know what InnerSanctum means when he says the "good and bad".  

InnerSanctum 11/9/2012 3:14:17 PM

 KungPow:  Apparently, your studies are limited.  Try harder than a Google search.  Yes, he was a flawed man.  And, true to the period of his time, had prejudices born from racism.  He was bipoloar (as was his wife) and suicidal.  He was uneducated (except for what he taught himself), it has been suggested that he experimented sexually, and he didn't start the damn war to free the slaves.  That was an outcome...not an intention.  He was even quoted as saying that he didn't think the black was smart enough to use a gun.  Get that right.  Alll those things make the man...not the myth.  I could give you some homework if you like, or do you prefer the reader's digest version? This is all well documented.  But, people prefer to see glossy, Hollywood , happy, fee the slaves Lincoln.    

Hell, even the Vampire Hunter book listed many of the man's flaws.  That is what makes a man.  

When I say "good and bad"...I mean a human (I thought that was obvious). Linocln was not a superman.  So, yeah, he had flaws just like 100 percent of us.  

That said, I am looking forward to the film.   But, I prefer historical fact to historical fiction in this case.  

Wiseguy 11/9/2012 4:07:57 PM

Wow somebody is a bit pompous and full of himself  around here

InnerSanctum 11/9/2012 7:01:03 PM

Um, not to be rude, Wise, but you have never been known to be the epitome of modesty.  I don't think we have ever seen you come across as a high handed know it all.   Please...



Deadfox 11/10/2012 2:35:48 AM

 Boys, boys.  Stop it.  Is this what Lincoln would have wanted?

1 2 >  >>  


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.