TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN Review - Mania.com



Movie Review

Mania Grade: C

Maniac Grade: B-

136 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

  • Movie: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
  • Rating: PG-13
  • Running Time: 2 hrs. & 24 min.
  • Starring: Shia Le Beouf, Megan Fox, Ramon Rodriguez, John Turturro, Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson, Kevin Dunn, Julie White, Isabel Lucas and Rainn Wilson
  • Written By: Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci, Ehren Kruger,
  • Directed By: Michael Bay
  • Distributor: Paramount Pictures, DreamWorks
  • Series: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN Review

Resistance Is Futile for the Transformers Sequel

By Rob Vaux     June 24, 2009


Optimus Prime returns as Mania reviews TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN(2009).
© Mania.com/Robert Trate

Critics really are eunuchs in the harem when it comes to movies like Revenge of the Fallen. Calling it bad 1) misses the point and 2) makes not the teeniest bit of difference anyway. Provided the number of giant robots bashing each other compares favorably with those silly talking sections, it more than meets the expectations of its fanbase. You might as well spend your time decrying the nutritional deficits of Doritos or telling a room full of smokers that cigarettes are bad for them. Everyone knows. They just don't care.

The bizarre honesty of director Michael Bay constitutes a sort of saving grace. He doesn't try to disguise the fact that his film is soulless corporate product; indeed, he embraces it with such obvious gusto that it becomes an auteurial style all its own. He loves colossal mindless explosions, prepubescent sexual innuendo and fetishized soldiers blowing the enemies of democracy to Kingdom Come. He adores the notion of a universe where every woman stepped fresh off the pages of Maxim and behaves like a brain-dead sexpot. I'm pretty sure he's even down with the spectacular destruction of hallowed works of antiquity (Princeton's library and the pyramids of Egypt both take it in the shorts here). Point out the shocking misogyny, the barely disguised racism, the thousand asinine crudities which pepper his movies like fleas on a hound dog, and he'll ask you where the downside is.

Revenge of the Fallen contains enough reprehensible material to send any rational adult into fits of rage, but if you didn't know that going in, you probably fail to meet the definition of "rational adult" anyway. The question then becomes whether such idiocy interferes with the purpose of the exercise (see "giant robots bashing each other," above), and here Revenge of the Fallen provides its beleaguered detractors with an opening to exploit. Too much of the film concerns itself with the human cast--still as boring as ever and still far less developed than the machines on the poster. Hapless teen Sam Witwicky (Shia Le Beouf) has become a lot less hapless as he heads off to college, to the point of telling his Autobot protector Bumblebee to stay home with his folks. Mr. And Mrs. Witwicky (Kevin Dunn and Julie White) play an inordinately large part in the proceedings as well (which should come as a relief to the hordes of teenage boys interested in the sex lives of middle-aged suburbanites), as does Megan Fox's porn queen mechanic and John Turturro's deranged ex-spook. Revenge of the Fallen adds a few new faces to the equation--notably Sam's dipshit college roommate (Ramon Rodriguez)--none of whom give any impression that the effort was worth it.

It goes without saying that these figures are laughable cut-outs, delivered with stunning clumsiness and evoking the kind of embarrassed audience reactions that accompany a six-year-old telling a dirty joke. At times, the dialogue literally becomes incoherent, as when Sam is infected with an ancient Transformer language that points the way to some magical hidden Maguffin or another. All of that is part of the package, of course; the trouble is that every moment we spend on it constitutes precious, precious screen time when we're not watching Optimus Prime knock his hated nemesis Megatron into the side of a mountain.

Moreover, while Revenge of the Fallen holds the requisite amount of whiz-bang mayhem, it also contains a number of really cool action-based notions… which it doesn't know what to do with. Since the first film, the Autobots and their human allies have formed a special task force dedicated to hunting down any evil Decepticons still on the planet. It’s a fantastic idea, and the details of how it works would easily lend the set pieces a nice sense of purpose. But Bay ignores them in favor of simplistic point-and-shoot stuff--Find Decepticon, Kill Decepticon--hampered by a ADD-laden editing style that doesn't even give us a reliable look at the robots as they morph into their hidden shapes. (The choppiness also makes it difficult to tell good robot from bad unless you're seriously steeped in the mythology.)

Similar bits of squandered potential appear time and again amid the demolition derby--most obviously in a battle between Autobot twins Mudflap and Skids (see "barely disguised racism," above), and a multisectional Decepticon many times their size. Bay spoke of a little-engine-that-could motif at the film's press conference--and you can kind of see it in the scene--but it's delivered with such atonal bombast that any distinctiveness or charm is rendered irrelevant. So too is Sam's journey to manhood buried beneath colorless cliché: present but utterly unremarkable, despite Le Beouf giving it his all.

As fundamental as such failings are, it may be unfair to chide Revenge of the Fallen too sharply for them. Like its predecessor, it remains resolutely critic-proof and more honest about its purpose than most soulless corporate abominations. "Mindless fun" reaches whole new levels with these films, and the frentic kinetics on display are probably still enough to let the faithful enjoy the ride. The vocal work, too, remains a joy, despite the thin material (I'd give real money just to hear Peter Cullen order lunch someday, and Tony Todd's honey-coated rumble makes for a welcome presence as the new Decepticon villain). But even in the most basic sense, Revenge of the Fallen smacks of lost promise: missing too many easy chances to lend the empty special effects some nuance. There's a point where "undemanding" becomes "enabling," and for this film, it arrives far, far too soon.

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 136
1 2 3 4 >  >>  
AMiSHPiRATE 6/24/2009 1:21:07 AM

Lies!  All Lies!  Revenge of the Fallen is the greatest summer block buster of all time!  Peter Cullen's performance as Optimus Prime is oscar worthy!

sharpe95th 6/24/2009 1:30:09 AM

"But it's supposed to be a no brainer, summer flick that isn't supposed to make you think. If you art-f*gs wanted all talk then don't go see it. I don't want to think when I see summer flick. I want explosions and boobs and butts and robots smashing things and enjoy myself."

Copy and paste above for the fanboys who actually think this (and the first one) was a good movie.

Me? I'm going to spend my 20 odd dollars to go to the movies in these tough times on something worthy. Like a life...

Bmfstunner 6/24/2009 2:00:34 AM

Just got back from seeing this at the show, I think there was a handful of moments I enjoyed. Michael Bay seriously needs to stop directing, I'll give him credit that he knows special effects, but as far as telling a story? No way. Now I was keen to the first movie, even that one was long and a little weak on plot, but this one was seriously 2 1/2 hours of explosions. Now I like explosions, but at some point it does become overkill. Michael Bay just consumes his movies with special effects to tell a story and instead of getting high caliber actresses just throws in some eye candy. Megan Fox maybe the sexiest women alive, but she can't deliver her lines at all without me grunting in disbelief. She's right in the fact that she shouldn't be compared to Jolie because both are gorgeous but Jolie is the only Actress, Fox is a star. This movie will do good, but if they do a third one, either two things need to happen. Michael Bay needs to get his shit together and stop making everyone of his movies the same or Michael Bay doesn't direct the next one.

Now I know I'm gripping about the movie, but in all honesty I'm a pretty fair person. I give every movie a chance, but this one was sad. I hope Michael Bay realizes from the critics that something is wrong with his directing. Even Roger Ebert, who is a pretty fair critic when it comes to Action movies, hated this movie.

I think the only characters I even cared about were the twins and that was it. Otherwise, there was like 40 other bots that I had no clue who they were and it's kinda disappointing when Ratchet/Ironhide have such a minor role.

Overall this movie could be a lot better, I know it's Summer Blockbuster type movie, but that doesn't mean that it shouldn't be held to sometype of standards. Iron Man is a perfect example of a movie that was a good Summer Blockbuster that didn't make you think, but still told a story and didn't let the special effects overshadow it.

MrJawbreakingEquilibrium 6/24/2009 2:25:02 AM

Wow, Sharpe, pretentious much?  What do you want from a movie about giant robots?  A life lesson? Why can't we have both type of movies?  You're a moron.

EvilMonkey 6/24/2009 3:53:22 AM

WHAT ??? No depth in a movie based on a cartoon based on a toyline.  THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS !!!!!

Seriously,  some people were actually looking for a story ?

Gimmee my giant robots bashing each other, I'm so there. ( Peter Culllen & Tony Todd as voices ? Awesome, now bring in Keith David and Kevin Conroy for the third movie)

Redshirt1 6/24/2009 4:05:39 AM

Without having seen it yet I'm going to go out on a limb and disagree with aimshpirate by stating that Star Trek is the best film of the year.  However, I will go see Transformers and enjoy it for the sole reason that it was created, Robots smashing Robots.  You can never go wrong with that.  Besides if you are looking for high minded entertainment you have to remeber that this movie is based on an action cartoon that's sole purpose was to sell toys to children.  It is not ment to be comparable to the great works of Shakespere.  Let the explosions commence! 

almostunbiased 6/24/2009 5:24:48 AM

I'll see it today and hope I don't waste my money.  I'm expecting to be simple after seeing the first one and yet I just have to see it for some reason.

Darkknight2280 6/24/2009 5:30:34 AM

Well told EVILMONKEY! What the hell do you want? ITs not base don a Jane Austin novel...ITs based on Robots that change into vehicles and weapons!! Excplosions, battles , sex and jokes is all ur gonna get as far substance form that souce material. Micheal Bay is the BEST at movies that have ZERO SUBSTANCE!! To the effect he is the Spielburg of his field! If there was an oscar for MOST MINDLESS MOVIE WITH BIG EXPLOSIONS category...he would win it every year, he is good at what he does! You want substance read a book instead of going to the movies this summer.

Darkknight2280 6/24/2009 5:32:19 AM

Also another note..its not liek the 1st TF wasnt sucessful..so there were plenty of people who like mindless action out there. It made over $700 million world wide...just remember that.

SgtTechCom 6/24/2009 5:32:20 AM

Give me Robots bashing each other. It's the Transformers not Gone With The Wind lol

People are expecting way way too much and need to relax. It's a cartoon turned movie. We get the characters the action and HEREEEEEEEEEEEE WEEEEEEEEEE GOOOOOOOOOOO !

1 2 3 4 >  >>  

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

USER REVIEWS

Chaotic Radio Review Transformers ROTF

by Kaeos
Grade: B-

 KAEOS
Grab your crank shaft and fire on all pistons,...    

POPULAR TOPICS