trazalca's Blog

TRAZALCA'S HOVEL

ABC plus CBS plus NBC equals ACNBCS???

(Wed 05/28/2008 02:31pm)

I perused through IMDB.com this afternoon, and came across this blurb about the
Big 3 networks working together for a cause. Read on.

Three Networks Set To Air Cancer Telethon
28 May 2008 10:38 AM, PDT

In an unprecedented one-night hookup, three major TV networks, ABC, CBS and NBC, have agreed to air a joint telethon on the first Friday night in September to raise money for cancer research. To demonstrate the networks' unity, the three evening newsbanchors appeared together on each of their networks' morning shows today (Wednesday) to promote the telethon. The fund-raiser was reportedly the brainchild of Katie Couric, whose late husband, Jay Monahan, died of the disease in 1998.


After reading this, it brought to mind something that had been brewing in my head for
quite sometime now: the networks uniting as one network.

Okay, so maybe that is a bit far fetched when you consider that NBC is backed by
Universal Studios, ABC with Disney, and CBS is partnered with Viacom, which runs Paramount
and Dreamworks. The Big 3 joining forces as one network would probably never happen,
but it if did, no one on God's green earth could ever accuse me of being surprised.
Sure, they've been bitter rivals to each other forever, each vying for your attention span with
sit-coms, endless crime dramas, and reality shows. Their battle for ratings has been a losing one.
Ratings for network TV overall has been suffering for many years, and it's getting desperate.
Unless a show has the ratings bonanza of an American Idol, or Lost, it's lucky to last a season,
no matter how well-produced, acted or intrigueing the series may be.
I wrote a letter to Nina Tassler of CBS regarding my disdain for good shows like Moonlight getting
the boot, but it was never with the belief that it would make a difference. I knew better than that.
I understand many did NOT like Moonlight for several reasons. Whether I disagree with
them or not is irrelevant. I liked the show, and that's enough for me.
But because the ratings did not justify it's stay on the eye network, ratings that other
smaller cable networks would love to claim, it's gone.

The truth is Moonlight remains a victim of how the Big 3 are running things season-in, season-out. Ten
years ago, had Moonlight been out then, it would've stayed a few more seasons if the numbers were
the same, but that is no longer the case. The number of new shows coming in and out of all the networks is near dizzying. It's really hard to keep up. The more new shows announced, the more turned off I become with
each title. My reason to care has dramatically dropped. Why should I give a new show a chance if it's
going to be cancelled within a few months? I'm sick of it.

I even read that Joss Whedon's new TV show on Fox, Dollhouse, is already getting campaigns to save the
show before it's axed, and it hasn't even aired yet! The case of desperation for good TV shows to last
a while longer continues erode the our patience. We, the TV viewing audience, is suddenly asked to
work harder to watch and keep watching at the bequest of the TV networks. That's insane.

Legally, financially, and thanks to no small measure of pride from each, the 3 networks getting together
may never happen. Yet in a climate where so many corporations are merging and partnering up for the sake of surviving in a volatile market, it's a wonder that it hasn't happened yet. Even if two of the three were to
join forces, would it make things better? Would there be less cancellations of good shows?
Who knows? Would it decompress the desperation level that results in axing-off shows with ratings
just below acceptable? Doubt it.

But with each year that passes, it's clear that this is not a cyclical problem that will go away, with all
3 networks back up in a high-flying upswing of success in another year or two. They can no longer claim
each other as the biggest competitor, which is a title now shared between cable, the internet, and gaming
consoles. And just like I touched on in my last rant, time has become more valuable a commodity than
ever before.

With so many choices before us on a daily basis, from playing GTA4, mastering Guitar Hero,
chatting away with family members online while completing a POGO.com challenge, laughing at
the latest exploits of Monk on the USA network, watching movies commercial free on any number of
channels, the Big 3 have their work cut out for them.

But the premature cancellations of good shows continues to plague the Big 3 to a degree that more
and more viewers are being turned off. No one watches free television to be frustrated. All they care
about is to be entertained while relaxing from the hectic insanity of their day. At its best, television can
be a lot of fun to watch and enjoy. But killjoys from the Big 3 continue to popup up, and it's only getting
worse. Sure, TV shows die off, and life goes on. I get that. But this is at an unprecedented level.

Can anyone here remember a time where so many fans of recently cancelled shows are pissed off
at once?

Sooner or later, something's got to give. And when it happens, the Big 3 may wind up on the losing
end of the deal. Unless, of course, they decide to strap their boats together to stay afloat.

You never know.

Comments/Responses
1
fastcar • Jun 06, 2008, 09:30am •
How ironic would it be if the telethon was cancelled before it aired? Granted, it would be a shame since it is inherently for a good cause. Fox will probably cobble together a rather similar looking telethon based on a related disease in its continued efforts to copy the Big 3 networks in every way shape or form. Of course, they'll probably have to cancel or bump a very well written, and produced show in order to make room. In fact they'll probably cancel half of their schedule to do so.



I'll tivo it and maybe watch it later...Better yet, youtube it.
I just hope that the telethon is either commercial free or the ad money goes to the research. But, that would be too idealistic. Three executives will probably make more money off this telethon than cancer research will.



fastcar
http://angrymongo.blogspot.com

mckracken • Aug 17, 2008, 12:58pm •
yeah i hear ya traz. These days the big 3 networks change their weekly lineups faster than the normal guy changes his shirt. It is getting rediculous. a LOT of people didnt start watching LOST till mid-way through the first season because, as you stated, they didnt want to invest in a show that would just get cancelled. When LOST showed some staying power, more and more fans sat up and began to take notice.

RE: on FOX, back in the late 80's when FOX was in its infancy, they actually gave genre shows a LOT of leeway... shows like Chuck Connor's WEREWOLF and Alien Nation and Married with Children would have been snuffed out had they debuted last fall on FOX.

But in contrast, the FOX animated TV shows have only really seen one large fatality and that was Futurama. (oh...and Family Guy!)

how the hell can people sign a petition to save Dollhouse when none of the episodes have aired yet?... uh.... CRUSADE... (oh right) still I'm thinking no matter how smart Josh Weadon is, seeing the mistreatment of Firefly come directly from the buffoons at FOX... why in the hell would Josh intentionally return to this network where he FAILED, as opposed to heading Dollhouse over to CW where he (on WB and UPN) had his success with Buffy and Angel for so long???
what gives Josh.. are you just Masochistic? do you LIKE causing pain and grief to yourself working with the buttholes at FOX as opposed to your time at WB?

1
Login to post a comment!