DVD Review

Send to a Friend



To: (email)


To: (name)


From: (name)


Message:



TRIUMPH OF THE WILL

By: BRIAN THOMAS
Review Date: Saturday, April 01, 2006

In 1934, filmmaker Leni Riefenstahl was assigned to create a film that would document the Nazi Party's Nuremberg rally and promote its ideals. She did just that, creating a propaganda masterpiece that, unbeknownst to her at the time, would help the efforts of men that would lead her country into a level of death and destruction never witnessed by modern man.

Adolf Hitler, seen arriving via airplane and open car, parading through the streets to the cheers of thousands, is seen as a savior who would lead Germany out of the turmoil they had been mired in since their bitter defeat in the World War. But Hitler isn't the entire focus of the film. More than anything else, TRIUMPH OF THE WILL is a triumph of glorification for the people of Germany. We're given a loving portrait of the strong and hopeful masses, none of whom have the slightest inkling that their team spirit will soon make them cogs in a machine that will destroy them. Throughout all the operatic speeches, displays, songs and parades, the message of racial purity and military strength is barely mentioned. Pride, unity and respect for the working man are the main themes, with platoons of uniformed men carrying shovels, not guns. Is there a vein of sarcasm running beneath the surface of Riefenstahl's imagery? Should we compare the platoons of uniformed men marching stridently into the future to the workers trudging into the maw of the beast in Fritz Lang's METROPOLIS? Is there a warning in how images of smiling, playing individuals gradually give way to grim, tedious masses of uniforms marching in order? That's up to the viewer to decide.

As I watched TRIUMPH OF THE WILL, I became increasingly puzzled. I'd always had the impression that Hitler and Nazis in general were pretty nasty characters. I've seen them try to kick around movie heroes like John Wayne, Bugs Bunny and Indiana Jones. Even today, most champion debate teams most often triumph over their opponents by comparing them to Hitler. But the impression given by this film, which is almost universally praised as a cinema landmark, is overwhelmingly positive. The Nazi leaders are all very charismatic, and their audience is made up of wholesome, likeable working people that adore them. Could I have been wrong about Hitler? He took a desperate, defeated nation and built them into a world power in only a few years. One can't argue with success, and it seems impossible that Hitler could have achieved everything he did and also be the madman some would have us believe. And though he was responsible for the invasion of neighboring countries, it's reasonable to assume that he may just have been invading these countries so that he would not have to defend German's from their attacks on his home soil. Perhaps Hitler, like so many other world leaders, was merely misunderstood.



This DVD edition, which presents the film in near pristine condition, also contains Riefenstahl's 17- minute short film DAY OF FREEDOM. It uses some footage also seen in TRIUMPH, but its focus is showing the demonstrations of military might which are mostly unseen in the feature. The soldiers all appear to be extremely heroic and capable as they set up anti-aircraft guns and race around in tanks and motorcycles. They're certainly inspiring, tempting the viewer to leap up and cheer them on.

So why did the Nazis and their leader Adolph Hitler come to be so hated by people around the world? In his authoritative commentrak, historian Dr. Anthony Santoro gives us a clue. He points out that the word "Nazi" never even appears in TRIUMPH OF THE WILL, and the leaders refer to their party as Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. It may be that the indemnity of Hitler was in fact a case of mistaken identity. After all, everyone was speaking German over there (a language little known here in the USA), and Hitler's identification with the Nazis could well have been some sort of mistranslation.

In his insert essay, Roy Frumkes, the editor of Films In Review, tries to convince us that TRIUMPH OF THE WILL cannot be classified as a documentary since its imagery has obviously been altered and manipulated, but his argument is difficult to accept. Even Hitler's secret alchemical laboratories had not yet developed the computer generated special effects we take for granted today, so there was no way that what we see could have been faked. But still, questions linger. Was Hitler a hero or a villain? Was the Germany portrayed in TRIUMPH a record of fact, or some sort of utopian fantasy? Since Riefenstahl died in 2003, we'll never know the truth. But her message remains plain: the National Socialist party has some inspiring ideas that could teach the leaders of today a few things.

Copyright © 2006 Brian Thomas, author of the massive book VideoHound's DRAGON: ASIAN ACTION & CULT FLICKS.
Questions? Comments? Let us know what you think at feedback@cinescape.com.



More Content By BRIAN THOMAS
Independence Week
(Tuesday, July 3, 2007)
TRANSFORMERS
(Monday, July 2, 2007)
LIVE FREE OR DIE HARD
(Wednesday, June 27, 2007)
Summer Camp!
(Tuesday, June 26, 2007)
EVAN ALMIGHTY
(Friday, June 22, 2007)
Free Kung Fu Superstars!
(Tuesday, June 19, 2007)
Ghost Rider!
(Tuesday, June 12, 2007)
HOSTEL PART 2
(Friday, June 8, 2007)
OCEAN'S THIRTEEN
(Friday, June 8, 2007)
SURF'S UP
(Friday, June 8, 2007)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
• Apr 01, 2006, 06:46am •
WOW! All I can say is this definitely proves the power of film. "Triumph of the Will" was a landmark film because of the way it manipulated the audience. It took actual footage and was edited in a way to make Hitler and the Nazi party look pretty good. It basically started the whole using film as political propaganda genre.

It's an incredible piece of editing, but that's about it. You don't need special effects to fake imagery in a film. The whole opening sequence of the film manipulates the viewer. You have shots of flying through the clouds as Hitler arrives on his plane as if he was coming down from Heaven. That's just one example, but there are quite a bit more.

If you watch this film, you should follow it up with the documentary Night and Fog, which uses much of the same footage, but in a completely different way. My college professor would show us Triumph of the Will and right afterward we'd Night and Fog, just so we can get rid of that nasty 'Yeah, Nazi's are cool' thought out of heads and see what Hitler actually did.

• Apr 01, 2006, 08:54am •
Films such as these and DW Griffiths "Birth of a Nation" should be watched and with the pretext of historical reference. Both films are landmark films and despite the social relevance of its subject, as cinematic expressions they were the highlight of its time.

• Apr 01, 2006, 09:42pm •
Did I just read:

"So why did the Nazis and their leader Adolph Hitler come to be so hated by people around the world?"

And...

"Hitler’s identification with the Nazis could well have been some sort of mistranslation."

And...

"Even Hitler’s secret alchemical laboratories had not yet developed the computer generated special effects we take for granted today, so there was no way that what we see could have been faked."

And...

"Perhaps Hitler, like so many other world leaders, was merely misunderstood."

I kept waiting for sarcassam. Perhaps a wink and a nod to give us some clue that, however good the movie is, you still remembered they were Nazis, and killed people.

How good could this movie be where you walked away with, "It may be that the indemnity of Hitler was in fact a case of mistaken identity"?

Hitler wasn't a tortured artist, he couldn't make it as one.

Yes, he brought a country (at first) out of dispair, and he was a good public speaker, and Time Magazine's Man of the Year, 1933.
But...

Oh, God, do I actually have to write this as a response? I feel like you're just writing crap to get angry responses from people.

You do you about all the Jews, right? Because, looking at this, I'm not quite sure.

• Apr 02, 2006, 05:26am •
The Jews weren't the only people persecuted by the Nazis either.

I understand all that crap that happened. I don't doubt that Hitler needed to be dealt with and that the Nazis were a serious threat to the world.

However, I would like to point out that history is written by the winners and that as individuals, the only way we can know what happened is by reading history books. It's been illustrated how propaganda can be misleading and easily palatable. So, to play devil's advocate: While what I know of Hitler is reprehensible, how sure are we that he was as bad as we were told?

• Apr 02, 2006, 11:23am •
Hahahhaha!!! Oh man, I fell for it. I can't believe it, but I fell for it. The A+ should have given it away. Cinescape never gives anything higher than an A- for any movie. Oh man, kudos to you Brian Thomas, great prank. Maybe next year you can relate the social neccessity and benefits of children being raised watching Faces of Death.

teabagging2000 • Apr 03, 2006, 07:15am •
Good one!

• Apr 03, 2006, 09:51am •
April Fool's jokes are supposed to be funny. All this considered in the world today, this is just too plausible as a genuine argument.

L.

• Apr 03, 2006, 10:14am •
Yeah, I'd have to say that this is a rather unfunny April Fools joke. I will admit that he had me going as you can read my first post, but at the time I made my comments, I wasn't even thinking it was April 1st as I read this around 3am Saturday morning.

• Apr 03, 2006, 12:00pm •
I would have had no idea it was an April Fool's joke until someone pointed it out. I guess its a good one, because you got me.

• Apr 05, 2006, 12:22pm •
Well since BT has yet to suggest otherwise one really really really hopes he was making an April fools joke. If not, he is a complete douche bag. Anyone care to tell how thay figured this was a goof? I will assume it is for BT's sake, hopefully he will post one of these days that it was a gag, albiet an unfunny one.

Brian Thomas - gamera23

Care to comment?

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!