TV Review

Send to a Friend



To: (email)


To: (name)


From: (name)


Message:



TV Review: THE ANDROMEDA STRAIN: PART 1

By: Stephen Lackey
Review Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2008

There are a ton of problems with this mini series which reared their ugly heads right away. The most painful and obvious of which are the flat as an IHOP pancake cast members – the worst of which is easily Rick Schroder. Every opportunity he takes to try and chew the scenery is cringe inducing. This guy wants to play these tough weathered parts and it just doesn’t work. He never successfully sells himself as being a tough military man. It’s like if Ralph Machio attempted to play the part of an aged martial arts teach training the new group of ninjas. It just doesn’t work. Part of the charisma free cast may be the fault of the writing and directing George Lucas style though. This is a possibility because Daniel Dae Kim also falls a bit flat in his role and we know he has charisma and acting ability because we see it nearly every week on Lost.

The first two hours of this mini series is executed using the Michael Bay or Jerry Bruckheimer play books. The Andromeda Strain doesn’t have the look and frenetic feel of films like The Rock or Armageddon but it does feature similar setups and chapters throughout the first two hours. For example there’s one scene that’s been in so many of these films – you know the scene – where each of the best people in their fields of study are brought together to combat this situation and they have introduce themselves and spell out their credentials. Not only that, there has to be two of the members that have conflict due to a previous situation and two others that have the spark of a romance. Just add salt for a perfect and familiar soup!

The set up of the mini series is that a satellite crashes in a small town carrying a micro organism that kills anyone exposed to it within seconds. Quickly the entire town is decimated and military pulls together a team of experts to investigate the situations and make recommendations to the government of what actions to take. Of course, within seconds Rick Schroder’s character wants to nuke the city while the lead scientist played by Benjamin Bratt wants to further investigate the situation. There are some plot twists and lots of behind the scenes political machinations happening to attempt to deepen the story arc. The problem is each beat feels like a beat we’ve seen hit many times before in better films. Also, the film is buried in toms of medical techno babble that while explained to a simple degree just seems overwrought.


Another complaint is the use of technologies that don’t exist yet or that have just started to become a possible reality. This film appears to be set in the now but the tech is at least 10 years in the future and more for some of the things in the underground lab where these doctors are working. It was easy to believe once long ago that the government had access to all of the fantastic technologies that we wouldn’t see in the public for years but nowadays when most military tech is revealed on cable television shows it just doesn’t sell, especially tech this far in the future. It seems like nearly everybody has video chat capabilities at full 30 frames per second, the computers are all run with touch screens utilizing gestures, computers can also do just about any kind of medical work literally “asked” of them, and “e” paper is a commonality in covert operations these days. Most of this technology is in its early life now but far from as advanced as we see in this film. This may seem like a minor complaint but it’s important because the heavy handed tech goes a long way in confusing the time in which the film is supposed to be set.

Buried under all of these complaints is still a Michael Crichton story, a good one, so that’s what makes it worth stick around for. When you dig through the flashy tech and stiff dialogue, and formulaic character development there’s still an interesting science fiction story here to be told. The ideas of nanotechnology and how the government attempts to place blame on an easy to sell villain are interesting and relevant ones. The cliffhanger does set up a somewhat predictable story arc for part two but being a Crichton fan I have expectations of something interesting to come for part two.



More Content By Stephen Lackey
TV REVIEW- HEROES: The Eclipse Part 2
(Wednesday, December 3, 2008)
TV WASTELAND- Do the Neilsen Ratings Truly Tell the Tale?
(Monday, December 1, 2008)
TV REVIEW- HEROES: The Eclipse Part 1
(Thursday, November 27, 2008)
TV REVIEW- TRUE BLOOD: You'll Be the Death of Me
(Wednesday, November 26, 2008)
TV REVIEW- 24: REDEMPTION
(Tuesday, November 25, 2008)
TV WASTELAND- Time Shifting Changes the Way We Watch TV
(Monday, November 24, 2008)
TV REVIEW- Smallville: Bride
(Saturday, November 22, 2008)
MANIA REVIEW- TERMINATOR: THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES: Complications
(Wednesday, November 19, 2008)
TV Wasteland: SCI-FI Fans Like to Panic
(Monday, November 17, 2008)
MANIA REVIEW- SUPERNATURAL: I Know What You Did Last Summer
(Saturday, November 15, 2008)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1
doublec • May 28, 2008, 10:10am •
I was wondering if this was going to be any good. Your reporting of the presence of Rick "Don't call me Ricky or I'll kill all you Muthas" Schroeder answers that question. Thanx for saving me four hour of quality time.

darkheart00 • May 28, 2008, 11:38am •
I watched the first half and found it to be pretty boring. I skipped the second half but my wife said it went from boring to ridiculous and ended abruptly.

sportwarrior • May 28, 2008, 12:26pm •
That's pretty much it, darkheart... The first part was boring, but it intrigued me enough to tune in for the 2nd part... My mistake. Waste of time. Part II was terribly and completely ridiculous.

flickman37 • May 28, 2008, 12:59pm •
What do you expect when the star is Benjamin Bratt? Horrible...but there was nothing else on.

1966Trekkie • May 29, 2008, 06:14am •
Jeez you guys, no wonder the studios don't put more sci-fi on tv. I thought it was pretty good. Not great but a far sight better than all the "reality show" drivel that's inundated the small screen. I can hardly watch network primetime anymore. In fact I don't even watch Lost. The networks are horribble. They put out a decent remake and people get all whiney about it.

Rick440 • May 29, 2008, 06:57am •
I STRAINED to watch it... hardee har har.

Nemesis157 • May 29, 2008, 07:41am •
This guy wants to play these tough weathered parts and it just doesn’t work. He never successfully sells himself as being a tough military man.


I don't think you wacthed the movie all the way because he wasn't trying to be a tought guy. I did not see one sence were sliverspoon was extra tought, infact he was gay. If look remember the convo he had when he told the other doctor the test he took made him seem like he was the solid figure thats way he was given the authority to over ride the self destruct. He basicly sd they test for everything accept being gay. It just sounds like your to old to forget silverspoon. stop hating the cast was good for a Tv mini.

Hotdog • May 29, 2008, 12:20pm •
I had so much hope for this show but was just disappointed. It was not even closely based on the book. The old movie was closer to the book than this trash. I thought the first part was ok but the second half sucked badly and was nowhere near the book at all.


Bill_the_Pony • May 29, 2008, 12:27pm •
Nemesis, is English your first language?

1
Login to post a comment!