Comic Book Review


ULTIMATES 3

By: Kurt Amacker
Review Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2007

The first issue of Ultimates 3 arrives after a delay far shorter than the one preceding the arrival of Ultimates 2 #13. While I appreciate the relative timeliness of its release, it feels less like a natural continuation of the last miniseries than a tacked on follow-up. Rather than expand upon the larger story already in progress, it opens with a number of changes to the team’s lineup with explanations offered via dialogue. The Black Panther and the Valkyrie have joined the team. Captain America and Janet Pym’s relationship seems to have dissolved. Quicksilver and the Scarlet Witch’s ambiguous relationship has been revealed as not questionably incestuous but completely incestuous. To top it all off, a sex tape between Iron Man and the Black Widow – from before she betrayed the team and died, of course – has found its way to the Internet. To top it off, Venom has it in for the team over an unnamed woman. The identity of Venom’s target provides the series’s main hook, along with the question of who filmed the sex tape. 
 
This feels like X-Men United in that it has many of the same characters and circumstances that defined its predecessors, but the relationships between them have changed into either something else entirely or halfhearted imitations thereof. It only distinguishes itself by presenting the team with some of the same ridiculous challenges faced by celebrities – most notably, the airing of personal issues by the media for public consumption. But, the series immediately dives for the bottom of the barrel with a sex tape scandal a la Paris Hilton or Pamela Anderson. You could call it commentary, or an excuse to show the very luscious Black Widow in a few compromising positions – I’m not sure why else the team would watch the tape on a big screen television together, even as they fret about its repercussions.        
 
Joe Madureira’s and Christian Lichtner’s combined art and colors, respectively, look like either someone’s tattoo, an airbrushed t-shirt, a graffiti mural, or some meeting between the three. It pushes unrealism past all bounds of necessity into something that looks like it belongs on the cover of a video game magazine.
 
Ultimates 3 has big shoes to fill, and this issue doesn’t bode well for the rest of the series.
 
Questions? Comments? Let us know what you think at comicscape@mania.com.



More From Mania

ULTIMATES ANNUAL #1

THE ULTIMATES 2 #1
(Wednesday, December 8, 2004)
THE ULTIMATES #2
(Tuesday, March 12, 2002)
THE ULTIMATES #1
(Thursday, January 31, 2002)
Marvel's THE ULTIMATES
(Friday, October 19, 2001)

See more related content
More Content By Kurt Amacker
Comicscape: Something is Always in the Way
(Wednesday, October 8, 2008)
DAREDEVIL #110
(Wednesday, October 8, 2008)
Comicscape: The Kirkman vs. Bendis Steel Cage Match
(Wednesday, October 1, 2008)
Comicscape: Saving Superman's House
(Wednesday, September 24, 2008)
Holy Shitaki, Batgirl
(Wednesday, September 17, 2008)
X-FORCE #6
(Wednesday, September 17, 2008)
PUNISHER: WAR JOURNAL #23
(Monday, September 15, 2008)
Comicscape: What Expands Must Contract
(Wednesday, September 10, 2008)
Comicscape: Warner Bros. Takes DC to the Movies
(Wednesday, August 27, 2008)
Comic Review: DRACULA MEETS THE WOLFMAN #1
(Monday, August 25, 2008)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1
gauleyboy420 • Dec 11, 2007, 01:07am •
Used to love the Ultimates.
Used to Live for each new issue...used to

CardinalSin • Dec 11, 2007, 07:28am •
It's a beautifully drawn book but, it's not the Ultimates. It's something else. Can this be the proverbial nail in the coffin for the Ultimate Universe????

bernini • Dec 11, 2007, 09:22am •
"D+"? Kurt, you're being far, far too generous.

This book was pure unadulterated crap from front to back. I seriously have to wonder who the editorial genius was who thought it a good idea to replace Millar/Hitch with any combination including Joe Mad.

The tone and voice of U1 & 2 has been completely tossed out the window for this over-the-top cliche in every way approach. It's awful from every perspective; I didn't know Loeb could write that badly, Joe Mad is COMPLETELY the wrong choice to follow Hitch, and the colors are an exercise in excess.

I didn't expect someone to fill every inch of the shoes left by Millar and Hitch. But I did expect some kind of continuity in tone and voice. Best example of a smooth handoff that maintains tone and voice in my mind would be Daredevil: Bendis/Maleev to Brubaker/Lark was as smooth and effortless a transition that kept me "in the zone" as one could pull off.

This Ultimates 3 is garbage. Pure garbage. And that's just a dadgum shame.

mortellan • Dec 11, 2007, 10:54am •
Gaddammit! Why god, why?!

joeybaloney • Dec 11, 2007, 11:09am •
Crap. It's sitting in my pile right now.

jedibanner • Dec 11, 2007, 12:27pm •
I guess there is one aspect that needs to be reminded....Jeph Loeb obviously doesn't want to do the same thing that Mark Millar did and Mark Millar was so happy when he knew that Jeph wasn't copying what they did, it seemed a good idea at the time (from Wizard Magasine).

The idea that JL wants to go into a new dierction makes sense, I'm sure we don't want a copy paste of what was done before because let's be honest, some of ''us'' would be the first one to call JL a phony for copying MM's work.

This approach of the new Ultimates does bring a new look into it and unfortunatly, the one thing that appears to be missing is the link itself with what was offered before. The dialogue is very short and the action is taking over the development of the story and that is the weakness of the series so far.

I do hope this gets better but...seems a bit of a letdown with this new version but time will tell, maybe things will get better.

gauleyboy420 • Dec 11, 2007, 01:11pm •
I think your mistaken Jedibanner,
Obviously no one wants to copy someone else's work,but that does not mean they need to re-launch or change the direction of the characters to avoid this so-called copying. Take for example Mr. Millars run on The Authority when he took it over from Ellis. He did not copy Ellis’s work, nor did he change the characters, or story. He took the characters on his journey. It’s totally possible to take over a book without making the changes Loeb has made. The changes being the characters and their actions, attitudes, ect...
HOWEVER I don’t think Loebs writing is the issue with this um ...issue. I like Loebs writing, although I think he’s using a device he’s been using in a side project of his, Heroes. The device of Here’s where they are now, I’ll tell you how they got here later. ( I can deal with it, but he can only pull it offf 1 more time)
My problem with this arc is the drastic change in the art. And it’s not the manga style, it’s the lack of storytelling. You simply can’t go from the artwork we were all lucky enough to see in Ultimates 1&2, to 20 pages of splash pages. Sure it’s kinda cool looking , but it’s not right for this book. It’s good for covers, trading cards, but not this book. His art is just in the wrong place, at the wrong time.

jedibanner • Dec 11, 2007, 03:04pm •
Well,

I'd say I don't fully agree with you on the art thing. I guess I'm saying that, if you took someone that had the same type of art as Bryan Hitch, it would become the same type of book it was before and from the way they are treating the Ultimates right now, it's obvious they want to bring something new into the book.

Joe Medeueria is good, his art is nice to watch (forget the realism of a human body with him that's true) but, I guss I'm more glad to just see different then what we have and I'm already not expecting nothing as good as MM and BH but just something completelly different.

I do hope we will get more details and information later, this being the only issue out for now is hard to judge at this point.

gauleyboy420 • Dec 11, 2007, 03:26pm •
Don't get me wrong. I like Joe Mad's art, BUT he's not a great storyteller. I don't need a Bryan Hitch clone, but I need solid storytelling, not 90's era splash pages.

mopeymatt • Dec 11, 2007, 08:05pm •
Why has no one brought up the fact that Loeb seems to be thinking he's writing a Marvel 616 book? Why is Thor speaking with a Shakespearan speech pattern (and brandishing a 616-universe hammer), and why is the Scarlet Witch in her regular universe costume? Someone told him this is the Ultimates, not the Avengers, right?

1
Login to post a comment!