Movie Reviews


V FOR VENDETTA

By: Rachel Reitsleff
Review Date: Friday, March 17, 2006

You really have to hand it to the makers of V FOR VENDETTA for having surprising guts. The list of producers includes Joel Silver and THE MATRIX's Andy and Larry Wachowski, who also adapted the screenplay with fidelity from Alan Moore and David Lloyd's graphic novel, and it's being released by Warner Bros., as mainstream as studios get. On its surface, it starts out a bit like something that might be called PHANTOM OF THE REVOLUTION tragically disfigured but incredibly strong and knowledgeable masked man rescues beautiful girl and then becomes a story of a lone hero fighting evil authority. Nothing too audacious-sounding about this so far heck, that's even the plot of AEON FLUX and ULTRAVIOLET, two movies that no one in his or her right mind would consider politically controversial.

So what's so radical about V FOR VENDETTA? Well, it's not just any old totalitarian regime that V (Hugo Weaving) seeks to bring down: it's near-future England, populated by a lot of extremely contemporary types with extremely present-day concerns. The villains are nationalist Christian demagogues who violently persecute Muslims, gays and satirists, among others for conspiracy buffs out there, they also create disasters which they then blame on "terrorism" from without. Feel free to add your own subtext Americans should note that the source material is British and the story is entirely set in Britain, so it's not meant as a comment on anything in the U.S. per se.


Even so, the movie is wholeheartedly on V's side, so it's in the position of endorsing explosions and assassinations as a reasonable method of regime change, which however one feels about it is a novel point of view for a major motion picture with recognizable religions, political issues and physical structures (if one sits all the way through the closing credits, after the detonation of an extremely recognizable piece of British architecture widely seen in the film's trailer, there is a disclaimer that no resemblance to "actual buildings" should be inferred).

However one feels about that let the arguments begin! V is entertaining in its emotional roller-coaster way, with the beauty and the beast elements between V and Evie (Natalie Portman), the spunky production assistant he rescues, gaining momentum as it goes and some excellent butt-kicking martial arts action, courtesy of stunt coordinator Chad Stahelski and V double David Leitch. Stephen Rea, as the sad-eyed detective on V's tail, has a lot of detail and wit, making a compelling impression. Stephen Fry contributes an droll and touching performance as a sketch show host and John Hurt, Tim Pigott-Smith and Roger Allam are all on target, finding nuances in the steely nastiness of their power figures. Director James McTeigue gets very, very big in places, but because he knows what he's doing, he's generally on the right side of the precarious division between visual grandeur and camp. There's a lot of money on display here, but there's also a statement-on-the-sleeve ethos that will remind viewers either fondly or annoyingly of low-budget '70s science-fiction, when allegory was sometimes bypassed in favor of confronting the "what-if" head-on.

V FOR VENDETTA won't be for everyone. People who loves its message may find its form too blatant; people who enjoy its look and action may dislike its politics; some people may like nothing about it (for what it's worth, this reviewer liked both style and substance). But three cheers for Warner Bros. and the filmmakers all the same, for their boldness in swimming against the current.




More From Mania

50 GB Blu-ray discs, V FOR VENDETTA announced and TOTAL RECALL on Blu-ray

Comicscape - March 29, 2006
(Wednesday, March 29, 2006)
VENDETTA Mask Replica
(Tuesday, January 3, 2006)
Composer Dario Marianelli has a VENDETTA
(Wednesday, June 29, 2005)
Weaving For VENDETTA
(Monday, May 9, 2005)
Purefoy Joins Portman For "Vendetta"
(Friday, February 18, 2005)
Portman to play V FOR VENDETTA
(Wednesday, January 5, 2005)
New life for V FOR VENDETTA
(Thursday, November 18, 2004)

See more related content
More Content By Rachel Reitsleff
88 Minutes
(Friday, April 18, 2008)
ALIENS VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM
(Wednesday, December 26, 2007)
HITMAN
(Saturday, November 24, 2007)
SLEUTH
(Friday, October 12, 2007)
THE SEEKER: THE DARK IS RISING
(Sunday, October 7, 2007)
HATCHET
(Friday, September 7, 2007)
RUSH HOUR 3
(Friday, August 10, 2007)
STARDUST
(Friday, August 10, 2007)
THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM
(Friday, August 3, 2007)
SUNSHINE
(Friday, July 20, 2007)
Comments/Responses
1 2 3 4 > >>
• Mar 17, 2006, 06:17am •
But the man himself (Mr. Moore) is not impressed, it would seem: Article from Sunday's Times...

http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?

(removed long URL which breaks the page.)

• Mar 17, 2006, 06:31am •
Well noted, but old news. Mr Moore, didn't like this interpretation of his work from day one. He doesn't like any of his works being adapted for the big screen and I don`t blame him. I`m pretty sure that I am going to like this movie, but others who are true to the original material may not. Not one team of directors and writers has got an Alan Moore story right, yet and I don`t think he believes they ever will. (Good luck with Watchmen) His stories are just too in depth and structured to be transfer as perfectly as say Sin City. Hopefully, this one is at least better then the rest. I`m looking forward to seeing it on Sunday.

• Mar 17, 2006, 09:10am •
Saw it last night and it's phenomenal. Highest recommendation.

shaftboy • Mar 17, 2006, 09:26am •
I think it's hard to convert a story from one media to another. Especially with something with a longer span to establish characters, plots and subplots such as a comic, graphic novel, or novel. What the audience and director have to realize is that things have to be cut, but the film has to still stay true to the roots of the original source. Characters shouldn't be drastically changed to fit a movie stereotype, and while subplots and parts have be cut or changed the overall theme, message and importance of the original material must be obeyed. A good example is X-men, Bryan Singer conveyed all the important themes, and set-up the vital characters, but he left out things like Wolverine coming in 15 years later, the age difference between Jean Grey and Cyclops, alot of things. He knew that his job was to translate the original media, not throw it on the screen. Ultimately translation may mean things get lost, or it doesn't fit the vision of the original artist, but ultimately the public has a say as to whether it was a successful translation or not.

But yeah, let's hope this one is better than the previous Alan Moore tales told on the big screen. I know that League of Extraordinary Gentlemen was completely botched, and From Hell was so-so. From what I hear, if this director does a good job, he'll do Watchmen.

• Mar 17, 2006, 10:59am •
Saw 'Vendetta' last night...Awesome! The visuals were incredible, the fight scenes well choreographed, and the writing was excellent. V definitely tops 'League" and 'From Hell'. The Wachowski Bros. and James McTeigue did an awesome job, and all the players outdid themselves, especially Hugo Weaving and John Hurt. No matter what you think of Hollywood doing another adaptation of Alan Moore's work, I strongly suggest you see this film and judge it on it's own merits.

• Mar 17, 2006, 02:46pm •
I hear that the Wachowski brothers are already working on the sequels... "P for Product Tie-Ins" and "S for Sell Out".

• Mar 17, 2006, 02:54pm •
"so it’s not meant as a comment on anything in the U.S."

Riiiight, and the Grand Canyon isn't meant to be taken as as a big hole in the ground. C'mon, let's call a "spade" a "spade".

This is what I expected from the Wachowskis. They made a beautifully sparse techno-file (The Matrix). They then made two multi-hour commercials passed off as movies (Matrix Reloaded and Matrix Revolutions). And to follow-up, they made a sermon film.

Yes, they have terrific film making talents, and this is a beautiful movie, but Hollywood is making the same it always makes... thinking that the American public is stupid.

• Mar 17, 2006, 03:37pm •
I thought the original comic was written in the 80s, and meant to take place after a nuclear war where a totalitarian government comes in to restore order after the chaos that had ensued.
The main chracter, V wears a Guy Fawkes mask and duplicates the crime which Guy Fawkes attempted in 1605, but was caught tortured and executed.

It seems to me, phillipej, that the real stupidity is arrogant Americans assuming the whole world revolves around them, and that everything is a commment on what we are doing here.

• Mar 17, 2006, 03:37pm •
phillipej> Interesting note:
Alan Moore originally began writing V for Vendetta in 1988.

It was completed in 1995.

This is NOT a commentary on America, nor was it ever intended to be. The original graphic novel was set in 1998 (which WAS the future, when Moore began writing it in 1988), so unless Moore and co. are clairvoyant, it has NOTHING to do with the USA.

• Mar 17, 2006, 04:36pm •
It just goes to show that the concerns of 1988 about the rise of fascism in democratic countries are still there now. Just look at Pink Floyd's The Wall (the movie) - released in 1984 I believe, with a lot of neo-fascist imagery inspired by Roger Waters' concerns about Thatcherism and the direction it was taking Britain in at the time. And then you have the Republic becoming an Empire in Star Wars. Regardless of how real the threat of democracy crumbling actually is, it makes for an interesting story-backdrop, and has been used many times before.

My big question is, given American film studio's sometime practice of "Americanising" stories which feature foreign characters and settings (eg dubbing Mel Gibson with an American accent in the original Mad Max, making John Constantine an American, putting Tom Sawyer into LXG etc) I wonder if at some point it was considered transposing the setting of V For Vendetta to America to "broaden its appeal"?? Obviously in the post 9/11 world they would never get away with doing that with a film where the hero is a "terrorist", but I wonder if somewhere along the way that was passed around as an idea??? Was this film in development pre-9/11???

In any case, I'm looking forward to it, but I'm not expecting to be as impressed by it as I was with the comic.

1 2 3 4 > >>
Login to post a comment!