What Would Jessica Chobot Do?


Videogame Movies: The Good, The Bad and The Worse.

By: Jessica Chobot
Date: Monday, April 16, 2007

This is it people! It is only going to go downhill from here.

This current “nerds who rule the world” trend is at its zenith. Right now. 

My recommendation? Enjoy it while you still can. 

One only has to look at the videogame market, the system wars and the genres offshoots to read the writing on the wall. Manga and anime have flooded the market, claim their own private sector at Borders Books and are the dominate style for most Saturday morning cartoons. Game systems have become self-contained entertainment/computers systems and cost more than my monthly car payment (and I own a damn fine automobile); and while  Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft each try to out-wit the other, EB Games is a cluster-^%&* of rushed titles, half-assed sequels and worthless game play. 

Nowhere is Geekdom’s downfall more glaringly obvious than through the eyes of Hollywood.  Mediocre videogame television can be found in the upper echelons of your cable provider. These shows are cardboard cut-outs of one another; each trying to find that elusive “too cool for school” ingredient that would help to attract hard-core gamers, or just amuse the casual ones, yet none willing to take a real risk. (Sadly, the reason this occurs is because the bankers/investors and producers usually have no idea what being in the videogame business actually involves, but I digress…). 


Big businesses headed by grey-haired producers, who haven’t touched a controller a day in their life, drop a few thousand on some random production with the hopes of making a quick million back and a cheap and easy established demographic. 

These are the people that are trying to cheat you. These are the people that are trying to take your hobby and turn it into a get-rich-quick scheme that will benefit no one but themselves. And while the television shows could use some improvement, nowhere is the nerd-based generational, monetary and cultural gap more obvious than through today’s videogame-based movies and films. 

While never a high art form, game-to-movie film adaptations of the early 90s’ seem more acceptable than the titles we pay $8.50 plus the cost of popcorn for today. Maybe it is a legit argument or maybe its just nostalgia, but Street Fighter and Mortal Kombat lend themselves as perfect examples. Low budget and geared at younger kids but embraced by nerds of all ages, these movies succeeded because they didn’t strive to be something they were not. There were no complicated plots, over-the-top and expensive CGI, no well-known star asking for top billing and his/her face plastered all over the poster. What we got were a few B-listers, a hot chick, the dude from Highlander and a lot of ass kicking. 

It was glorious. 

Today, all we see is an overload of computer-generated smoke, a few over-the-top scenes of gore involving razor wire and an old woman’s virginity and a lot of pomp and circumstance for a movie that just doesn’t deserve it. 

Silent Hill proved to be a massive disappointment in this regard. After such a dismal showing from the studios/directors/producers on games-to-movie adaptations (lets not forget all of the comics-to-movie adaptations which are just as bad, if not worse! DareDevil and Elektra anyone?!?) such as Doom; hype grew to rather large proportions surrounding the almost assured success of Silent Hill.  

Thought to be the movie that would bridge the gap between Mr. Every-Man cinema and Fan-boys, Silent Hill had all the makings of being a shoe-in. An incredibly deep and engaging plot which linked all four versions of the SH universe together, a recently successful director (Christophe Gans of Brotherhood of the Wolf fame), a musical score created by the same gentleman who worked on the ones within the game franchise (Mr. Akira Yamaoka) and we even got the B-listers from the days of yore!

Gans assured everyone that fans and non-fans alike would approve. Yamaoka-San echoed those same sentiments. With that type of glowing recommendation, how could SH possibly fail? 

It couldn’t and it didn’t…..technically speaking. 

Having opened up in the US at #1 and eventually grossing a total of $47 million, Silent Hill seemed (at least, to the suits) to have done everything it promised (rumor has it a sequel is already in the making). But the Silent Hill fans I’ve talked with seem to have given me the universal response of, “Meh.” Mr. & Mrs. Every-Man say, “I didn’t understand what was going on.” And my mom and pop were all, “WTF!?” 

It looks as if that $47 mill. might have been steeped in nothing more than basic curiosity. Will that be enough to support round 2? What about the “bridging of the gap?” How will this affect soon-to-be released titles such as Resident Evil: Extinction? Even more importantly: how will this effect how and which videogames are brought across to film, especially with such big title announcements such as Gears of War and Halo? 

My two cents is that if they even get made (you’d be amazed at how many projects get lost along the way), they’re never going to fare any better than the RE series or SH. Halo has such a following that it will be a success whether the fans enjoy it or not. If Blomkamp and Jackson want to do it right-they will stick as close as humanly possible to Halo’s storyline. And now with Gears of War bringing up the rear, they had best put a move on it!

Doom’s biggest mistake is that it took to long for it to come to the big screen. For a game that was released in 1993, for it to be put on the backburner till 2005 was an incredibly moronic maneuver. By then it had been overshadowed by titles such as Unreal Tournament series, Quake and Halo.

Silent Hill’s biggest mistake is that it tried to be all things to all people. And, although I get plenty of flack for this, the Resident Evil movies are probably the closest to finding that perfect balance between fanboys and average movie-goers (plus it has Mia. Mia + zombies + government conspiracies gone awry = Chobot’s $8.50, plus the cost of popcorn)!

DOA’s biggest mistake is that it was ever made in the first place (/sarcasam). 
 

All in all, I admire and respect the fact that some studios and videogame companies are even trying to tackle this aspect of entertainment, and I think that in the long run, they’ll get it right. This will happen when the movie makers take the videogame guys more seriously and acknowledge their expertise within the area and look to them for guidance. Once that occurs, the videogame guys need to sack up and speak when they think something is wrong with the adaptation of their product. 

Let’s just hope this “geek is the new black” phase doesn’t die on the vine anytime soon and that Uwe Boll doesn’t scoop up all the film rights and take everything over.

More Content By Jessica Chobot
Comments/Responses
1 2 3 4 > >>
Jakester • Apr 16, 2007, 08:30am •
You're spot on, but Hollywood is like this with ever y "in-genre." They milk it for all it's worth and then it implodes. Look at the alien invasion TV series glut we had a season or two ago. Now I really miss "Invasion" which suffered because of the other crap shows (If you liked "the other crap shows," I don't care).

You also see the same thing in chain restaurants. I'll use Macaroni Grill as an example -- my wife and I used to love the place: really good food, reasonable prices, great service. But now that they're popular, the portion size has decreased while the price has increased, and the food quality has diminished (the penne rustica should be described as having bits of pruscutto, some chicken and A shrimp), and the wait staff is more interested in turning the tables as opposed to ensuring that the guests leave happy.

So too with Hollywood and the game makers. And in fact, releasing crap games to make a quick buck is nothing new if you recall 2600 Pac-Man and E.T. Hell, my Dad bought me Pac-Man because I was so rabid for it, but he knew it sucked, and even though I played it until I mastered it, I knew it sucked, too.

And while the first MK movie was actually pretty good, the second one and that TV series...yeah...they sucked too.

I liked Silent Hill overall, but it was clear that it wasn't written/directed by anyone from the US. When the cop watches the little girl lay down in the front seat at the gas station, I was surprised that she didn't arrest the Mom. It's illegal for kids to sit in the front seat until they're like 13, and I think they need a booster seat until they're like 8 or 9 (or reach a certain height/weight). That's something any cop would know -- even a West Virginia cop.

nax37 • Apr 16, 2007, 08:44am •
They should make Pac-Man: The Movie! Starring Keanu Reeves as Pac-Man, Scarlett Johansson as Mrs. Pac-Man, and Russell Crowe as Pinky.

Merin • Apr 16, 2007, 10:26am •
I'll back the sentiment about "gaming" tv. I was something of a fan of TechTV, didn't watch much of it but I really appreciated that it was on the channel (like the History Channel and The Learning Channel (before that became the Design channel))

Now I did end up watching X-Play for awhile, largely because I had taken up a second part-time job at EB Games for about a year, and I found the show mildly enjoyable (Adam Sessler, I think, comes across as fairly genuine to most adult male gamers - I'm not touching a discussion of Morgan Webb, though)

G4 bought TechTV, everything went way downhill. But then I'd never enjoyed G4 to start with.

For that matter I can't stand most gaming magazines anymore. It seems like they all try to be so sarcastic, indifferent, impossible to please and so very immature in their focus . . . I miss magazines that just told what was coming out, had some interviews with designers, and rated games without the inane and adolescent attempts at humor.

I really liked Silent Hill. My wife, someone who doesn't like Horror movies and who doesn't play video games, liked Silent Hill enough to ask me to buy it on DVD. That one shocked me - when Halloween comes around she still fights against watching horror and tries to get us to watch a suspense thriller instead.

I was impressed with Mortal Kombat when I saw it in the theater - a friend and I had gone to it as a joke, and turned out we both really enjoyed it. The sequel - blech.

I couldn't watch Street Fighter. Poor Raul Julia.

Doom was pretty wretched.

The Resident Evil movies are not shining examples of award winning film, no, but I really like them as well. It's the kind of thing I like to see in the theater.

. . . I really enjoyed DOA. Did you see it, Jessica, or are you just saying you know it'll be stupid? Again, my wife, not big on exploitation of women nor a video game player (she didn't understand what DOA meant or anything, but she did recognize the volleyball section from when I tried to get her to play the DOA Volleyball with me) enjoyed the movie well enough - actually agreed to see it after I showed her the trailer.


People constantly rag on Hollywood for remakes, for making comic book movies, for making video game movies, yadda yadda yadda -
the real problem is how Hollywood makes movies. Period. The majority of what they make is so filtered, rewritten numerous times, controlled by producers who get money to make the films but have no creative talent and no interest in the subject matter of the films, studios who want to play every film to that mythical "mainstream audience", market research done by college students who make up most of the results and the suits who manipulate the results to say what they want them to say anyway . . .
it's the process, not the material, that makes most everything seem "blah" at best.

galaga51 • Apr 16, 2007, 11:18am •
Yeah, I liked Macroni Grill too... until my parents announced their divorce after THIRTY-FOUR YEARS!

I guess I'll go drown my thoughts in bad film adaptations.

creamygnome • Apr 16, 2007, 03:40pm •
I'm still waiting for the sequel to Super Mario Brothers. I mean that cliffhanger had me on the edge of my seat! Will John Leguizamo save the princess?! We have to be on the watch for DE-evolution! Sigh.

jetpackjesus • Apr 16, 2007, 04:26pm •
Merin, I too found DOA to be extremely enjoyable even though I watched it on Google Video with crap resolution. It's by no means a good movie, but damn did I enjoy the absurdity of it (and the Eric Roberts of it!)

The one point in the article I disagree with is putting Street Fighter anywhere near the same league as Mortal Kombat. Perhaps SF could be compared with MKII, but the first one is actually quite good for what it is. SF was just awful on every level, but still very funny. They just dramatically changed the characters and stories for that film, leaving it no redeeming qualities. MK, on the other hand, stayed rather faithful and had decent action/effects for the time (plus Christopher Lambert!) I've always felt very sorry for Raul Julia that his last real film was Street Fighter. He deserved much better.

almostunbiased • Apr 16, 2007, 04:33pm •
I agree with you Jakester. Hollywood will milk anything as long as they can for more money.

I'd like to see Dues Ex Invisible War become a video game adaption movie. Or Stalker which just came out for PC. Those were awesome stories, but they'd probably just screw them up as they did all the others.

MetalWatero • Apr 16, 2007, 04:45pm •
Glad to see you're back. I thought they fired you after all your amorous and racy comments in your last several articles. I kept thinking, "They must be crazy to have fire her--she's the best thing that ever happened to their site!!!" You really should be writing for PENTHOUSE and HUSTLER Magazines, your know. That's a compliment, btw. Jusin Timberlake didn't Bring Sexy Back--Jessica Chobot did!!!

As far as Geeks Ruling The World Goes, well they sure are messing things up...and I'm a Geek...but just look at Dick Cheney!!! And while we are on the subject of Geek Meltdowns...in regard to movies, Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez are the biggest symptom of this mess, Kill Bill, Sin City and Grindhouse are all horrible movies. Films that Harry Knowles at aintitcoolnews.com and others, never fail to give great reviews to. Well, the public at large has been burned too many times by these bogus reviewers to fall prey to the plants anymore.

According to posts on both YouTube and aintitcoolnews.com...post made by the public, mind you, people were walking out on Grindhouse in mass. And let me tell you, 300 was given great reviews by Harry Knowles and his team...and was a boring, racist and badly edited mess of a film. Yes people paid to see it, but after all the hype and claims that it was a great film, I think a lot of people felt burned. I even felt burned, and I saw it on bootleg!!! Glad I didn't pay to see it!!! Hence, I wasn't gonna pay good money to see Grindhouse after my experiences with Kill Bill, Once Upon A Time In Mexico, Desperado, Sin City, The Spy Kids movies and From Dusk 'Til Dawn (all trash!!!). Don't know what the people behind these films are enjoying behind the scenes, but as Rick James once said..."Cocaine, it's one hell of a drug!!!"

MetalWatero • Apr 16, 2007, 05:21pm •
PS: The Hard "R" Rating that 300 got, is, and was, a marketing SHAM!!! There was nothing in the movie that earned an R Rating...nothing at all. In fact, the film was barely a PG. Don't believe me??? Well, most, if not all, of the so-called "Hard R" material appeared in commercial ads for 300 during primetime television shows. I'm not kidding. There were no real sex scenes to speak of...no dirty language (just a lot of bad and very long speeches in between slow-motion sword fights, and then, more speeches, more slow-mo and more speeches...all designed to convince us to back invading Iran aka Persia)...and the few beheadings that were talked about by film critics were even shown in the ads on tv, save for one...which could have easily appeared on CSI.

This whole movie--and its marketing, was a SCAM...to save what even the studio regarded as a film that was sure to bomb!!! Well, the marketing worked, and fans were ripped-off...some going as far as trying to convince themselves that they had seen a good movie...or worse, a great one!!!

Point is, they didn't see a good film, not even close...and if you want to pay the studio back for this...don't buy or rent the DVD!!! But then again, that is up to you to boycott, or not to boycott. But if you want to see what 300 should have been...rent or buy the animated movies, Ralph Bakshi's "Fire And Ice", and "Wizards", and the Ralph Bakshi inspired "Heavy Metal"... based on French born Heavy Metal Magazine...all these films, lost treasures, deserve shot for shot live action remakes...that's how good they are!!!

Merin • Apr 16, 2007, 05:26pm •
300, Kill Bill, Grindhouse, and Sin City all attacked in one long rant.

Followed by exaltations of three animated films that, while at the time were a little ground breaking, sure don't stand the test of time.

Mark me down as one who isn't going to use MetalWatero as a gauge for whether or not I'll enjoy a film.

Oh, and P.S. - 300 had several scenes of nudity, one mild but still nude sex scene, lots of violence (lots and lots) and plenty of blood, severed limbs, and corpses. I don't know what MetalWatero needs for an R rating in his world, but this classifies for me as needing an R.

I can't believe I'm feeding a troll.

1 2 3 4 > >>
Login to post a comment!