36 Comments | Add
Rate & Share:
Related Links:
Info:
Watch Out! WATCHMEN 2 Is Coming!
Because you can't stop the inevitable By
Chad Derdowski
August 11, 2010
Source: Mania
Comicscape: Is a WATCHMEN sequel inevitable?
© Mania
Just before this year’s San Diego Comic Con, comic book visionary Alan Moore broke the news: DC had offered him the rights to Watchmen, “… if I would agree to some dopey prequels and sequels”, as he so eloquently put it. Needless to say, Moore refused and blabbed to the comics media about it. DC co-publishers Dan DiDio and Jim Lee responded by assuring fans that “Watchmen is the most celebrated graphic novel of all time. Rest assured, DC Comics would only revisit these iconic characters if the creative vision of any proposed new stories matched the quality set by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons nearly 25 years ago, and our first discussion on any of this would naturally be with the creators themselves.”
Which, roughly translated, seems to say “You can bet your sweet ass there’s gonna be a sequel, a prequel or both.”
Don’t Kid Yourself
Remember when Jason Todd was killed and Denny O’Neil made that remark about how “It would be a really sleazy stunt to bring him back”? Remember how Wolverine’s origin was always shrouded in mystery and Captain America was always tormented by Bucky’s death? Remember the love triangle between Superman, Clark and Lois? Remember Spider-Man’s marriage? Some things change for the better; other things change for the worse. We’re not here to debate the merits of these stories though. We’re just commenting on the fact that in this day and age, stories and subjects previously thought untouchable and taboo are now seeing the light of day. A Watchmen sequel or series of prequels might seem like sacrilege, but so did all of the previously mentioned stories. Sooner or later, someone will come up with an idea and pitch it to the right editor who says “Why not?”
Waaaaaaay back in 2008, an edition of Comicscape appeared which praised DC Comics for resisting what must’ve been a pretty intense temptation to do any Watchmen-related stories, especially with the release of the movie looming. Well, that was two years ago, Paul Levitz isn’t the big man anymore and DC is looking to step up their game. Scroll back up a bit and re-read that statement from DiDio and Lee. It doesn’t say “we won’t do another Watchmen story without Moore and Gibbons”, but merely states that these characters won’t be used unless the creative vision matched the quality of the original. Well… quality is subjective, folks. One man’s junk is another man’s treasure and as far as we’re concerned, they’re just preparing us for the inevitable.
Do you really think that J. Michael Straczynski honestly believes that a short leather jacket and spurs are “… a look designed to be taken seriously as a warrior”? Of course not. But the powers-that-be will tell you whatever they feel is necessary in order to sell a story and a company man will give you the company line. We’re not trying to pick on JMS here (we’ll save that for our reviews of Superman) or even Wonder Woman’s costume. We’re just preparing you for Dan DiDio’s inevitable comments about how ‘We couldn’t get Alan and Dave back… but these guys have cooked up a truly amazing story that’s really on par with what what they did back in 1986, only modernized.’ or whatever it is he’s gonna say when the Watchmen pre/sequels are announced.
Then Again… No
The flipside of the coin was actually brought up by one of the fellows working at our local comic shop (Fun 4 All in beautiful Ypsilanti, MI). Simply put, who the hell is gonna step up to that plate?
One has to assume that any number of writers and artists would love to do a Rorschach story or get inside the head of Dr. Manhattan for a few pages. Maybe they’ve even written their own Watchmen spinoffs that they’ve tucked away in a private file or folder in a locked vault somewhere. And we’re pretty sure that most anyone who has done professional comic work has likely done a Watchmen sketch or two. But who wants to subject themselves to the public scrutiny that would go along with writing the Watchmen sequel? It doesn’t matter how good the story actually is, it’s gonna get panned by a lot of readers even before they’ve seen the cover. Comic fans live to dispense insults and talk trash about a product, sight unseen. Hell, there are already fans declaring the Captain America film a bomb based on the fact that pre-production pictures don’t feature wings on the helmet! Any Watchmen-related project, even one with Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons onboard, would be the biggest target to ever hit a comic shop. Who in their right mind would tackle that kind of assignment?
Okay… who other than Grant Morrison would tackle that kind of assignment?
Multiversity
Speaking of Grant Morrison, remember all that hubub about his proposed Multiversity project? Remember the one that was described as “… if Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons had pitched Watchmen now, rooted in a contemporary political landscape but with the actual Charlton characters instead of analogues!”?
We’re not really sayin’ anything here… we’re just thinking out loud.
It could go a million different ways. We don’t expect to see a straight-up sequel, but we wouldn’t be surprised to see a few one-shots focusing on each character during the primes of their career, with several different creative teams working on it. Maybe a mini-series or five. It really doesn’t matter how they do it – it won’t be Watchmen any more than that Scarlett book was Gone With the Wind or Son of Kong was a worthy successor to King Kong. Does anybody remember 1986’s King Kong Lives? Didn’t think so. Hell, does anybody remember Dark Knight Strikes Again at this point?
So as far as we’re concerned, it’s cool. We’re not complaining here, just playing Nostradamus and predicting what we feel is an inevitable future. We’re not worried about it either. We’re crossing our fingers for something worthwhile, but if it’s not – Watchmen will still sit on our shelves alongside the original Star Wars trilogy and the first three Indiana Jones movies. Bad sequels don’t ruin the originals or rape childhoods; they just remind us how awesome the original was in the first place.
And hey… if anybody at DC is listening, we’d love to be proven wrong.
The only possible way this could be worthwhile is if Gibbons is involved. I think it's a no-win situation for DC storywise. Even if it's the best comic of the year, it will still pare in comparison to the original, and the more likely scenario is that it won't even be that good. It is a sure-fire seller though, and DC is a business after all. I'm sure George Lucas didn't care too much about the criticism of his prequels, as he watched the millions roll in.
I just don't understand what they could do in a prequel or sequel. a sequel would seem to be largely uninteresting considering the state of the world, and lack of Rorschach. a prequel also unnecessary, as all the key events were covered in flashback in the original series, so what you're left with is generic super hero adventures in a golden or silver age fashion.
another Legion issue of Adventure Comics this week!!!