WATCHMEN slugfest heats up - Mania.com



Round Up

13 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

WATCHMEN slugfest heats up

With a court ruling and no setttlement in sight the studios prepare to clash

By Rob M. Worley     December 30, 2008
Source: Various


© Mania.Com/Josh Gordon

Last week federal judge Gary A. Fees issued a ruling in the Fox vs. Warner Bros. lawsuit over 'Watchmen' indicating that Fox is on solid legal ground and at least has distribution rights over the new movie. The judge recommended energies be diverted to reaching a settlement and ordered all parties back to court on Monday, December 29th, for a status conference to determine how the case would proceed.

 

Well, the conference has happened and the gloves are off. According to reports in both Variety and The Hollywood Reporter, Warner Bros. is not backing down from plans to release the film on March 6th and Fox is not backing down from its threat to block that release.

 

Warner Bros. released this statement to the media: "We respectfully but vigorously disagree with the court's ruling and are exploring all of our appellate options. We continue to believe that Fox's claims have no merit and that we will ultimately prevail, whether at trial or in the Court of Appeals. We have no plans to move the release date of the film."

 

Fox also had a brief statement for the public: "We are gratified by the recognition of our rights in the Judge's order, which speaks for itself."

 

Of interesting note: the website UncivilSociety.org has posted a PDF containing Judge Fees' December 24th ruling as well as various documents filed by Fox and Warner Bros. It makes for fascinating reading.

 

 

While many are characterizing the Fox lawsuit as an ambush, Fox claims to have evidence that Warner Bros. was fully aware of Fox's rights with regards to 'Watchmen'. Further, they're asserting that Warner Bros willfully and maliciously decided to move forward with the production and take their chances in court.

 

A key player in this is producer Lawrence Gordon, who initially obtained control of the 'Watchmen' movie in a 1991 agreement with Fox and has remained attached to the development of the film up to and including its current incarnation. Apparently Gordon hasn't been too helpful as this case has unfolded. In the Christmas Eve ruling Fees wrote:

"Gordon’s testimony regarding the facts, circumstances, and events surrounding the negotiation of the 1994 agreements would have been of assistance to the Court in evaluating the objectives of the parties at that time. However, Gordon refused to testify on that subject during his deposition because he supposedly could not separate what he knows based on his own recollection from what he learned from counsel. Gordon’s counsel therefore asserted the attorney/client privilege and instructed Gordon not to answer any questions on the subject. The Court takes a dim view of this conduct and questions whether the assertion of the privilege was proper. Moreover, the assertion of the privilege does have a consequence: having now reached a decision based on the record before it, the Court will not, during the remainder of this case, receive any evidence from Gordon that attempts to contradict any aspect of this Court’s ruling on the copyright issues under discussion."

 

Furthermore, Fox's filings indicate that, as a legal strategy, Warner Bros may seek to protect themselves by placing blame for any chain-of-custody issues at Gordon's feet, thereby making Gordon personally responsible for any damages Fox might recoup.

 

Absent some settlement agreement, the case will go to trial in front of Fees on January 20th and it'll be determined then whether or not fans will get to see the most anticipated movie of 2009 on March 6th, as currently scheduled.



Thanks to Antonello Blueberry for the submission.

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 13
1 2 >  >>  
Wiseguy 12/30/2008 8:07:28 AM

Judges, been the most powerful beings in the USA, am sure will find a way to let WB release the film but they'll have to pony up. I'm not a lawyer but ever since this first made headlines  and read a bit up on it, it appeared to me that Fox had a good argument. And if they have this evidence that WB purposely ignored Fox's rights , well they might as well break out the check book and rightfully so. I'm actually rooting for Fox here, if it wasn't evident already, and I'm sure the film will be released according to schedule and hopefully they'll resolve the whole thing about the Batman series in the process.

I'm finding this really intriguing. I hope tru tv carries it live.

darkheart00 12/30/2008 10:50:27 AM

 Again, Fox very well may still have the rights to this film and it sounds like they do. If that is the case they have every right to do what they are doing. The question and why I am most irritated is how they allowed the film to be completed in the first place. Why didn't Fox try to stop Warner Bros. early on when this film was first announced. The business tactic being used by Fox is what I call into question here. Sure waiting until now is probably going to maximize their profit margin and I am sure that is what they are up to; however, it still makes them look like douche bags.

hanso 12/30/2008 12:27:34 PM

A plague on both your houses!!!!!!!

I've made up my mind.  Not only will I boycott Fox but now I have added WB into the mix.  When I say boycott I mean I shall not pay, not that I won't watch.  Anyway, I will boycott Fox's Wolverine for trying to get this delayed.  I will boycott WB's Watchmen for going ahead with this even though they weren't supposed to and for not letting me have Adam West on Blu Ray. 

fft5305 12/30/2008 12:44:10 PM

I don't know why people are getting mad at Fox over this. If they did have the rights (or believed they did), I don't blame them for trying to get a piece of the pie. I don't believe anyone on this site would hesitate do the same, if they believed they were owed money over a situation like this. Just like when PJ sued New Line over LOTR money. In any case, I'm thinking this bodes well for the movie itself.  Both companies wouldn't be fighting like this if they thought it was a crapfest that wouldn't make any money. Then again, I'm just cynical enough to think this may be what this whole thing is about - an overly elaborate publicity stunt. Regardless of the outcome, I doubt seriously that the movie's release date is in jeopardy. The only thing at issue is how much money, if any, Fox will make on the whole deal.

xenomorph 12/30/2008 12:49:41 PM

FOX: RIGHT WING REPUPLICAN NAZI'S WHO WANT TO KILL ENJOYMENT AND GOOD IDEAS! FUCK THE LAWSUIT!

THE WATCHMEN ARE WATCHING YOU,  MURDOCH!

tovuk 12/30/2008 5:06:14 PM

You guys should check out www.comicbookmovie.com, they are starting a petition there for Fox, & Marvel to try to give them a piece of our minds. This does really suck.

Hobbs 12/30/2008 6:55:23 PM

I'm not going to go as far as boycotting...not yet.  I still believe they'll work something out and maybe Fox does have the rights to it but they didn't give a shit about the movie until they noticed this thing is going to make over 200 mil in the US alone.  If there was negative buzz about this movie or looked like crap they wouldn't give a shit if the movie was released or not.

It's all about the $$$   A common theme in America these days.   Greed is never a good thing.

 

SONYMANswallows 12/30/2008 7:03:45 PM

If Im reading this right, and I like to think I am---its neither companies fault. Its the producer's fault. The producer has screwed both companies in regards to this film. It seems that the producer mis lead WB like Christian Terrorist Bush and LBJ have mislead America andAmerica's soldiers. Also WB screwed themselves or at least DC did by not making sure the rights were all part of 1 company.

 

The best thing that could come from this would be if DC brought FOX and WB's together like MARVEL did for its films. I think though that WB's may have to much money and other factors that control DC properties going to a media form other than print.

CHAMP 12/30/2008 7:33:13 PM

 If Fox were smart, and they do in fact own the rights, they should just take a percentage of the profit. Why delay the release? What's the purpose of that? You can still make money if it's released, but what do you gain if it's not released? Nothing, other than the satisfaction of knowing you still own the rights to a movie that you didn't have the balls to make.

xenomorph 12/31/2008 4:12:51 AM

My problem is with fox, not Marvel. Thankfully Marvel has its other properties(i.e. IronMan, Captain America, Thor, Hulk) set up at other studios.

1 2 >  >>  

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

POPULAR TOPICS