The WB Talks BUFFY
By: Frank KurtzDate: Wednesday, July 18, 2001
At the Television Critics Association gathering in L.A., the WB chose to address why they had to let BUFFY go.
Talking for the WB, Brad Turrell spoke of the series, saying, "We love the show. We loved working with Sarah. And we made a tremendous effort to keep the show. But in the end, it was obvious that keeping the show was impossible. Not only is the license fee about as high per rating point as for what NBC paid for ER, but not announced at the time but soon thereafter, within about three days, the UPN deal for BUFFY also included a two-year affiliation extension with the Fox owned UPN affiliates in New York, Los Angeles, and other major markets, thus keeping UPN alive. Without that distribution, there's not a network. That meant that UPN was prepared to outbid any offer we put on the table, and they did. But at what price? Last year, UPN took in about 135 million dollars in the up front. And this year, they're stuck somewhere around 50 million, it might be up to 70 million at this point, or just what they paid for one season of BUFFY, a show that represents just one of hour of programming on their network. That's absolutely their right to do that. And that's what they did. That's the real story behind BUFFY. And that's why it's not on the WB this year."
Meanwhile, the situation with BUFFY looks to have a lasting effect on the network. When asked if his previous comment that the loss of BUFFY was akin to Aramgeddon for the TV biz, the WB's Jamie Kellner says, "I think it does have long-term ramifications. I think you'll -- obviously the programs we purchased this year are something that have been in development for a long period. I think we're going to see the industry continue to polarize towards a vertical structure, which is not good for the industry, I think. I think it's much better if you can find ways to deal with various different program suppliers. And probably what will happen is -- hopefully what will happen is that we'll be able to create new business models that allow networks to acquire programs from other suppliers that will prevent programs from one network to -- back to the studio-supported network."
When asked if his new program deals were affected by the BUFFY loss, Kellner says, "The deals that area in -- you know, that were in place last year preceded what happened with BUFFY. Will we be looking to create models on a go-forward basis with certain suppliers? Probably."
More From Mania
Sarah Michelle Gellar Talks ALICE Horror
Sarah Michelle Gellar not in "The Dark Knight"
(Friday, April 13, 2007)
Sarah Michelle Gellar joins "The Dark Knight"?
(Friday, March 30, 2007)
Sarah Michelle Gellar in The Dark Knight? Not likely!
(Wednesday, March 28, 2007)
Sarah Michelle Gellar joins ADDICTED
(Wednesday, August 30, 2006)
Gellar on a Pup Named SCOOBY
(Tuesday, June 18, 2002)
Gellar not up for BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER film?
(Thursday, June 6, 2002)
Gellar: 'I'm Out If Buffy Moves'
(Tuesday, January 23, 2001)
See more related content




















